Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Alix, and thanks once again for this great inquiry. I appreciate your

sense of curiosity and willingness to reach out for the resources you need.

 

I would call the thinking you describe as fundamentally misguided. Where the

idea comes from that fruits can take minerals out of the body is beyond me.

It's quite literally nonsense.

 

We are designed to eat fruit, above all else, and green leaves. All the

other stuff people tout is not primary food for our species.

 

We teach people to build their base around sweet fruits, not acid fruits, I

agree about that. But the acid fruits are then fine, particularly in the

company of greens.

 

If we consider what the human body needs in terms of nutrients, we get:

 

1. Oxygen, far and away #1, and not even considered a nutrient.

2. Water, far and away #2, and again not considered a nutrient.

3. Fuel -- simple sugars (glucose, fructose), in the case of our species.

4. Minerals, particularly alkalizing minerals.

5. Soft, digestible fiber.

6. Proteins and fats -- FAR less than most people imagine. And

interestingly, the actual science is very consistent on this point. We need

only about 5-6% of total calories from proteins, and about the same from

fats.

 

The ONLY foods that provide this mix are fruits, and greens fill in with

additional minerals, fiber, and other nutrients found only or primarily in,

well, green leaves. And guess what carbohydrates are typically found in

green leaves? Glucose, fructose, and some sucrose. (A sucrose molecule

consists of one glucose and one fructose molecule, bonded together.) Quite

the consistent match!

 

Nuts, seeds and grains are low in oxygen, water, fuel (again SIMPLE sugars),

soft fiber. They are high in fats, somewhat high in proteins, and VERY high

in INdigestible fiber. The are foods for other species. In fact, there is

nothing in our design that makes us a biological match for these items as

foods, certainly not primary foods.

 

Vegetables other than soft, tender greens are indeed high in oxygen, water,

and fiber ... but lots of indigestible fiber, and often lots of starch. We

do not digest starch well.

 

Hope all this is helpful. I'll add one more thing.

 

I have had 3 teachers since being introduced to RF who have really been my

primary influences. Of those, Ray Kent is probably the most significant,

though almost no one these days knows who he is (in the U.S. anyway). Ray

likes to say that all majority opinions are wrong. And in general, I agree.

So if you see the majority of society motoring in a particular direction,

look elsewhere. And if you see the majority in the RF world traveling a

certain path or set of related paths, again, look elsewhere. What I describe

is well supported in the sciences and almost completely ignored by, well,

almost everyone. The knowledge is there, all we need to do is use it ... and

trust Nature's design, over concoctions of the human forebrain.

 

Eating should be, first and foremost, an entirely functional activity. And

in Nature, that means it should follow a principle called the Conservation

of Energy. We should not need to spend more time preparing a meal than we

spend eating it. I'm not suggesting that we should never have fun in a

kitchen. But I AM suggesting that much of what people do in the kitchen,

they do because they think they " should " , or because " it's better for them, "

or the like. I assure you that nothing could be further from the truth.

 

We can pick up fruits and eat them ... that's our design. We can walk

along, come to a fruit tree or vine, reach out with ease and pick the fruits

.... that's our design. And if we rely upon fruits and leaves as our primary

foods, we reach a point where we need to replenish only minimal amounts of

water ... and THAT's part of our design ... to continue to thrive, even when

Nature creates a drought/famine.

 

I encourage anyone interested in this subject matter to participate in our

upcoming FREE teleconferences:

 

- What is Health? (Wednesday, January 24)

- Messages from Within (Wednesday, February 7)

- Eat to Live! (Wednesday, February 28)

- Nutritional Self-Awareness (Wednesday, March 28)

 

and an extra, on emotional eating and related matters, not yet announced (in

a manner of speaking :)

 

- Do I have two minds, or what? !! (Saturday, February 17)

 

Wishing the very best to one and all,

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Alix Bernet

Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:37 PM

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Heating raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

Hello Elchanan,

 

I red that eating a lot of fruit can take out of your body the essentials

minerals.

And not too much acids fruits (oranges...) because of the acidity on the

teeth and not on the body because they act as an alkaline product. So

basically not too much fruit and no more than two acids fruits a day.

What do you think of this argument ?

 

Alix.

London

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, public schools teach that there are six nutrients: Water,

Vitamins, Minerals, Carbohydrates, Fat, Proteins. I agree that water should

be part of the list. Thanks for your insights Elchanan. They are quite

helpful.

 

 

 

Pat

 

 

 

 

 

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Elchanan

Friday, January 19, 2007 8:22 PM

rawfood

[Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating raw

foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

 

Hi Alix, and thanks once again for this great inquiry. I appreciate your

sense of curiosity and willingness to reach out for the resources you need.

 

I would call the thinking you describe as fundamentally misguided. Where the

idea comes from that fruits can take minerals out of the body is beyond me.

It's quite literally nonsense.

 

We are designed to eat fruit, above all else, and green leaves. All the

other stuff people tout is not primary food for our species.

 

We teach people to build their base around sweet fruits, not acid fruits, I

agree about that. But the acid fruits are then fine, particularly in the

company of greens.

 

If we consider what the human body needs in terms of nutrients, we get:

 

1. Oxygen, far and away #1, and not even considered a nutrient.

2. Water, far and away #2, and again not considered a nutrient.

3. Fuel -- simple sugars (glucose, fructose), in the case of our species.

4. Minerals, particularly alkalizing minerals.

5. Soft, digestible fiber.

6. Proteins and fats -- FAR less than most people imagine. And

interestingly, the actual science is very consistent on this point. We need

only about 5-6% of total calories from proteins, and about the same from

fats.

 

The ONLY foods that provide this mix are fruits, and greens fill in with

additional minerals, fiber, and other nutrients found only or primarily in,

well, green leaves. And guess what carbohydrates are typically found in

green leaves? Glucose, fructose, and some sucrose. (A sucrose molecule

consists of one glucose and one fructose molecule, bonded together.) Quite

the consistent match!

 

Nuts, seeds and grains are low in oxygen, water, fuel (again SIMPLE sugars),

soft fiber. They are high in fats, somewhat high in proteins, and VERY high

in INdigestible fiber. The are foods for other species. In fact, there is

nothing in our design that makes us a biological match for these items as

foods, certainly not primary foods.

 

Vegetables other than soft, tender greens are indeed high in oxygen, water,

and fiber ... but lots of indigestible fiber, and often lots of starch. We

do not digest starch well.

 

Hope all this is helpful. I'll add one more thing.

 

I have had 3 teachers since being introduced to RF who have really been my

primary influences. Of those, Ray Kent is probably the most significant,

though almost no one these days knows who he is (in the U.S. anyway). Ray

likes to say that all majority opinions are wrong. And in general, I agree.

So if you see the majority of society motoring in a particular direction,

look elsewhere. And if you see the majority in the RF world traveling a

certain path or set of related paths, again, look elsewhere. What I describe

is well supported in the sciences and almost completely ignored by, well,

almost everyone. The knowledge is there, all we need to do is use it ... and

trust Nature's design, over concoctions of the human forebrain.

 

Eating should be, first and foremost, an entirely functional activity. And

in Nature, that means it should follow a principle called the Conservation

of Energy. We should not need to spend more time preparing a meal than we

spend eating it. I'm not suggesting that we should never have fun in a

kitchen. But I AM suggesting that much of what people do in the kitchen,

they do because they think they " should " , or because " it's better for them, "

or the like. I assure you that nothing could be further from the truth.

 

We can pick up fruits and eat them ... that's our design. We can walk

along, come to a fruit tree or vine, reach out with ease and pick the fruits

.... that's our design. And if we rely upon fruits and leaves as our primary

foods, we reach a point where we need to replenish only minimal amounts of

water ... and THAT's part of our design ... to continue to thrive, even when

Nature creates a drought/famine.

 

I encourage anyone interested in this subject matter to participate in our

upcoming FREE teleconferences:

 

- What is Health? (Wednesday, January 24)

- Messages from Within (Wednesday, February 7)

- Eat to Live! (Wednesday, February 28)

- Nutritional Self-Awareness (Wednesday, March 28)

 

and an extra, on emotional eating and related matters, not yet announced (in

a manner of speaking :)

 

- Do I have two minds, or what? !! (Saturday, February 17)

 

Wishing the very best to one and all,

Elchanan

_____

_._,___

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last summer I was playing with FitDay to see how close to 80/10/10 I could come

and one day all I ate was watermelon. Believe it or not, it came in at 8/1/1.

Really shocked me. Where's the fat in watermelon? Who cares, it tasted good

and I felt great.

 

Shari

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a great observation, Shari. First, I'll tell you that the protein and

fat values on FitDay are slightly overstated, and the USDA database has been

updated. I believe that, if you were to run the numbers today, you'd see a

bit less fat and protein.

 

But that aside. no animal or plant life can exist without SOME fat. Fat is a

thermal and electrical insulator, and certain substances are fat soluble

(dissolve in fat), not water soluble. So fat really is an essential part of

life.

 

Best,

Elchanan

 

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

SV

Friday, January 19, 2007 7:34 PM

rawfood

Re: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

 

Last summer I was playing with FitDay to see how close to 80/10/10 I could

come and one day all I ate was watermelon. Believe it or not, it came in at

8/1/1. Really shocked me. Where's the fat in watermelon? Who cares, it

tasted good and I felt great.

 

Shari

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Pat, I was unaware that the schools had added water to the list. I

wonder how widespread this new perspective may be.

 

And thanks, also, for your very kind words of appreciation. I sure do love

what I'm doing!

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Pat Carson

Friday, January 19, 2007 7:28 PM

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

Actually, public schools teach that there are six nutrients: Water,

Vitamins, Minerals, Carbohydrates, Fat, Proteins. I agree that water should

be part of the list. Thanks for your insights Elchanan. They are quite

helpful.

 

Pat

 

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId

=27213/stime=1169306089/nc1=4299915/nc2=4025375/nc3=3>

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was Home Economics teacher for 20 years. We always taught that water is a

(n essential) nutrient (is part of the curriculum in Texas and as far as I

know, most home economics teachers are of the same belief). I was taught in

college and high school also. Trouble is, I am not sure how much time most

devote to nutrition outside what is promoted by large industry who provide

many free teaching materials. You know where that has led.

 

 

 

Pat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Elchanan

Saturday, January 20, 2007 1:18 PM

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

 

Thanks, Pat, I was unaware that the schools had added water to the list. I

wonder how widespread this new perspective may be.

 

And thanks, also, for your very kind words of appreciation. I sure do love

what I'm doing!

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com

[rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com] On

Behalf Of

Pat Carson

Friday, January 19, 2007 7:28 PM

rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com

RE: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

Actually, public schools teach that there are six nutrients: Water,

Vitamins, Minerals, Carbohydrates, Fat, Proteins. I agree that water should

be part of the list. Thanks for your insights Elchanan. They are quite

helpful.

 

Pat

 

<http://geo..

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId

> com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId

=27213/stime=1169306089/nc1=4299915/nc2=4025375/nc3=3>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Elchanan,

 

Thanks for your information.

I didn't meant that fruit are bad. I think they are really good in a

moderate quantity mainly the sweet one, but the acide ones aswell in more

moderate quantity.

Because even if there are really healthy there are full of sugar (even the

fructose the best sugar) and so contributes to high variation of glucose in

your blood which is not very very good. Isn't it ?

But perhaps my knowlegdes are not complete.

Personnally since i m 100% raw (8th days Hourray) i just eat fruit the

morning (mainly sweet grapes watermelon apples bananes..) and two or four

during the day (with at least one or two acids one).

I try to focus more on vegetables mainly greens. Big salads with all kind of

veggies, seaweeds, wheatgerm, flaxseeds oil, and sprouted seeds are my two

main meals.

But I eat a lot of nuts aswell (100 or more per day) because even if i know

that there is protein in veggies, seaweed, and sprouted seed i need them

(even if there are very fat).

Twice a day since i began i ate a mixture of :

2-3 dates (or dried fruits)

1 or 2 table spoon of tahini or peanut butter

2 or 3 small spoons of sunflower seeds or cashews or pistachio

1 banana or an apple

some apple juice

It's delicious and heavy so i m not hungry for 4 or more hours during my

work.

The nuts are heavy and a little bit difficult to digest at the beginning

(but every day less difficult to digest) but like this i don't need to feed

myself every two hours and it's balanced my quite well.

And plus i adore the taste !

I think it's a period of adaptation of my mind and my body. Because i will

probably need more variety of food soon as i think i tasted all the

different kind of nuts in the world. (Have you ever tried the tiger nuts !

very interesting).

If you know some others things to eat i m interesting to know them. There

are probably some unknown things.

And I would like to know more about you aswell because you are the moderator

of this forum and you give a lot of advices to everybody:

How long have you been raw ?

Are you 100% raw ?

Why did you decided to be raw ?

What is your work for living?

What was your personnal mistakes and errors in your raw experience ?

What is your best experience ?

And anything else that permit me to know you better.

Thanks a lot.

Enjoy your day.

Alix.

 

 

> " Elchanan " <Elchanan

>rawfood

><rawfood >

>[Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating raw

>foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:21:36 -0700

>

>Hi Alix, and thanks once again for this great inquiry. I appreciate your

>sense of curiosity and willingness to reach out for the resources you need.

>

>I would call the thinking you describe as fundamentally misguided. Where

>the

>idea comes from that fruits can take minerals out of the body is beyond me.

>It's quite literally nonsense.

>

>We are designed to eat fruit, above all else, and green leaves. All the

>other stuff people tout is not primary food for our species.

>

>We teach people to build their base around sweet fruits, not acid fruits, I

>agree about that. But the acid fruits are then fine, particularly in the

>company of greens.

>

>If we consider what the human body needs in terms of nutrients, we get:

>

>1. Oxygen, far and away #1, and not even considered a nutrient.

>2. Water, far and away #2, and again not considered a nutrient.

>3. Fuel -- simple sugars (glucose, fructose), in the case of our species.

>4. Minerals, particularly alkalizing minerals.

>5. Soft, digestible fiber.

>6. Proteins and fats -- FAR less than most people imagine. And

>interestingly, the actual science is very consistent on this point. We need

>only about 5-6% of total calories from proteins, and about the same from

>fats.

>

>The ONLY foods that provide this mix are fruits, and greens fill in with

>additional minerals, fiber, and other nutrients found only or primarily in,

>well, green leaves. And guess what carbohydrates are typically found in

>green leaves? Glucose, fructose, and some sucrose. (A sucrose molecule

>consists of one glucose and one fructose molecule, bonded together.) Quite

>the consistent match!

>

>Nuts, seeds and grains are low in oxygen, water, fuel (again SIMPLE

>sugars),

>soft fiber. They are high in fats, somewhat high in proteins, and VERY high

>in INdigestible fiber. The are foods for other species. In fact, there is

>nothing in our design that makes us a biological match for these items as

>foods, certainly not primary foods.

>

>Vegetables other than soft, tender greens are indeed high in oxygen, water,

>and fiber ... but lots of indigestible fiber, and often lots of starch. We

>do not digest starch well.

>

>Hope all this is helpful. I'll add one more thing.

>

>I have had 3 teachers since being introduced to RF who have really been my

>primary influences. Of those, Ray Kent is probably the most significant,

>though almost no one these days knows who he is (in the U.S. anyway). Ray

>likes to say that all majority opinions are wrong. And in general, I agree.

>So if you see the majority of society motoring in a particular direction,

>look elsewhere. And if you see the majority in the RF world traveling a

>certain path or set of related paths, again, look elsewhere. What I

>describe

>is well supported in the sciences and almost completely ignored by, well,

>almost everyone. The knowledge is there, all we need to do is use it ...

>and

>trust Nature's design, over concoctions of the human forebrain.

>

>Eating should be, first and foremost, an entirely functional activity. And

>in Nature, that means it should follow a principle called the Conservation

>of Energy. We should not need to spend more time preparing a meal than we

>spend eating it. I'm not suggesting that we should never have fun in a

>kitchen. But I AM suggesting that much of what people do in the kitchen,

>they do because they think they " should " , or because " it's better for

>them, "

>or the like. I assure you that nothing could be further from the truth.

>

>We can pick up fruits and eat them ... that's our design. We can walk

>along, come to a fruit tree or vine, reach out with ease and pick the

>fruits

>... that's our design. And if we rely upon fruits and leaves as our primary

>foods, we reach a point where we need to replenish only minimal amounts of

>water ... and THAT's part of our design ... to continue to thrive, even

>when

>Nature creates a drought/famine.

>

>I encourage anyone interested in this subject matter to participate in our

>upcoming FREE teleconferences:

>

>- What is Health? (Wednesday, January 24)

>- Messages from Within (Wednesday, February 7)

>- Eat to Live! (Wednesday, February 28)

>- Nutritional Self-Awareness (Wednesday, March 28)

>

>and an extra, on emotional eating and related matters, not yet announced

>(in

>a manner of speaking :)

>

>- Do I have two minds, or what? !! (Saturday, February 17)

>

>Wishing the very best to one and all,

>Elchanan

> _____

>

>rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

>Alix Bernet

>Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:37 PM

>rawfood

>RE: [Raw Food] Heating raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

>

>Hello Elchanan,

>

>I red that eating a lot of fruit can take out of your body the essentials

>minerals.

>And not too much acids fruits (oranges...) because of the acidity on the

>teeth and not on the body because they act as an alkaline product. So

>basically not too much fruit and no more than two acids fruits a day.

>What do you think of this argument ?

>

>Alix.

>London

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Pat,

 

Wow, this is really eye-opening for me!!! Here I've been observing

" nutritional science " all these years when I should have been observing home

economics!!! (NOT joking!!! )

 

Thanks!

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Pat Carson

Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:49 PM

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

I was Home Economics teacher for 20 years. We always taught that water is a

(n essential) nutrient (is part of the curriculum in Texas and as far as I

know, most home economics teachers are of the same belief). I was taught in

college and high school also. Trouble is, I am not sure how much time most

devote to nutrition outside what is promoted by large industry who provide

many free teaching materials. You know where that has led.

 

Pat

 

<http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId

=27256/stime=1169479737/nc1=4299907/nc2=4025375/nc3=3>

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Morning Elchanan,

 

After funding cuts, getting a bad rap from the likes of Ross Periot, and

teachers who thought they should be teaching only the craftier side - baking

cookies and making aprons -- while slighting the science of Home

Economics), Home Economists encouraged a greater emphasis on the science

(social sciences included) and changed the name to Family and Consumer

Sciences. If you are interested in observing, you can read more about Family

and Consumer Sciences and FCS curriculum @ these web sites:

 

 

 

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_economics

 

American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences: www.aafcs.org/

 

 

 

For National Education Standards:

 

Here you will find a link for food science, dietetics, and nutrition

education standards.

 

http://www.doe.state.in.us/octe/facs/natlstandards.htm

 

 

 

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Home Economics (a little slow to

catch on to the new name)

 

This site outlines the essentials to be taught in FCS @ the high school

level. Other states have similar sites.

 

www.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter122/ch122e.html

 

 

 

 

 

Pat

 

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Elchanan

Monday, January 22, 2007 8:19 PM

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Are fruits really our primary foods? (WAS: Heating

raw foods (WAS: VERY new to raw food diets)

 

 

 

Hi Pat,

 

Wow, this is really eye-opening for me!!! Here I've been observing

" nutritional science " all these years when I should have been observing home

economics!!! (NOT joking!!! )

 

Thanks!

Elchanan

_____

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...