Guest guest Posted January 28, 2007 Report Share Posted January 28, 2007 Thanks so much, Melanie, for letting us know about this article! I can't wait to read it! Judy Pokras vegwriter editor/founder/publisher The Little e-Book of Raw Thanksgiving Recipes Raw Foods News Magazine _www.rawfoodsnewsmagazine.com_ (http://www.rawfoodsnewsmagazine.com/) An online magazine celebrating raw vegan cuisine since March 2001, and featuring authoritative info, breaking news, and fun interactive features on the raw vegan lifestyle. Chosen as a 2005 Hot List Item by SRQ Magazine. Recommended by best-selling author Harvey Diamond, Writer's Digest, EnergyTimes, The Vegan Guide to NYC, the Japanese magazine Engine, breathing.com, and the national radio program Carolyn Craft's Inner Wisdom. Sign up for our free e-newsletter! When you advertise with us you reach a targeted market. Did you know that switching to a vegan diet helps prevent global warming more than switching to a hybrid car? In a message dated 1/28/2007 2:08:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, melanieburtis writes: From today's (1/28) New York Times Magazine -- there is an article on food and I haven't yet read it in its entirety, but wanted to share this great quote: " ...a health claim on a food product is a good indication that it's not really food, and food is what you want to eat. " -- Michael Pollan The introductory headline reads: " Thirty years of nutritional science has made Americans sicker, fatter and less well nourished. A plea for a return to plain old food. " Another headline: " Nutritionism, which arose to help us better deal with the problems of the Western diet, has largely been co-opted by it, used by the industry to sell more food and to undermine the authority of traditional ways of eating. " The article also states that medical & science studies have recently shown that loads of fiber does not lessen colon cancer rates, a low-fat diet does NOT ease breast cancer rates, and Omega 3s may not, according to at least one major study, reduce coronary diseases. In my personal opinion, from reading of other research reports (my Ph.D. is in education, not nutritional science or the medical field), and some anecdotal evidence, cancer is caused by emotions & trauma, not necessarily food. Poor food consumption could be an efficient assistant to the process (both in causing & healing), but there is much, much, more to the picture, according to many researchers & quantum physics. Today's article also reports that some studies, such as the China Study, suggests it's the animal protein, not the fat, that is the culprit to American's ill health. The article also discusses how we've taken the diets of healthful cultures out of context from their lifestyle. What we know about the Meditteranean diet is from a study of Crete in the 1950s -- along with the diet that has been touted, the people studied performed more physical labor than Americans, they fasted regularly, and consumed far fewer total calories. Anyway, if you get a chance to read this artcile, it would be worth your time. There are discussions of how " we " have come to rely on grains but that critical micronutrients are much easier to get through greens, and how omega 3s, which industry has people believing are good to get from fish are easier to get from algae. After all, that's where the fish get 'em. Melanie Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2007 Report Share Posted January 28, 2007 From today's (1/28) New York Times Magazine -- there is an article on food and I haven't yet read it in its entirety, but wanted to share this great quote: " ...a health claim on a food product is a good indication that it's not really food, and food is what you want to eat. " -- Michael Pollan The introductory headline reads: " Thirty years of nutritional science has made Americans sicker, fatter and less well nourished. A plea for a return to plain old food. " Another headline: " Nutritionism, which arose to help us better deal with the problems of the Western diet, has largely been co-opted by it, used by the industry to sell more food and to undermine the authority of traditional ways of eating. " The article also states that medical & science studies have recently shown that loads of fiber does not lessen colon cancer rates, a low-fat diet does NOT ease breast cancer rates, and Omega 3s may not, according to at least one major study, reduce coronary diseases. In my personal opinion, from reading of other research reports (my Ph.D. is in education, not nutritional science or the medical field), and some anecdotal evidence, cancer is caused by emotions & trauma, not necessarily food. Poor food consumption could be an efficient assistant to the process (both in causing & healing), but there is much, much, more to the picture, according to many researchers & quantum physics. Today's article also reports that some studies, such as the China Study, suggests it's the animal protein, not the fat, that is the culprit to American's ill health. The article also discusses how we've taken the diets of healthful cultures out of context from their lifestyle. What we know about the Meditteranean diet is from a study of Crete in the 1950s -- along with the diet that has been touted, the people studied performed more physical labor than Americans, they fasted regularly, and consumed far fewer total calories. Anyway, if you get a chance to read this artcile, it would be worth your time. There are discussions of how " we " have come to rely on grains but that critical micronutrients are much easier to get through greens, and how omega 3s, which industry has people believing are good to get from fish are easier to get from algae. After all, that's where the fish get 'em. Melanie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.