Guest guest Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 Woof Woof! MBSA barking up wrong tree _ Malysiakini.com Fauwaz Abdul Aziz Dec 21, 05 12:42pm If a Mercedes Benz is involved in a fatal accident, will they ban the make from the roads? This is the logic which the Shah Alam City Council (MBSA) is applying when it comes to dog licences, said Anthony Thanasayan head of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Petpositive). Enraged pet owners claim that the council has completely missed the point. It's not about regulating the animals but about educating their owners. " Blaming the rottweiler is like blaming the car for an accident, " said the wheelchair-bound Thanasayan when met at the sidelines of a dialogue between dog owners and Shah Alam deputy mayor Za'ba Che' Rus yesterday " It's not the dogs at fault. It's the devils who let them out, " he added. Thanasayan (right) said if the authorities could conduct public awareness campaigns on dengue, why can't they do the same to educate dog owners and dispel false perceptions some people have about the animals. The dialogue, at the MBSA building, was held to collect feedback on several conditions for dog-licenses that will be introduced next year. About 50 pet-owners and representatives of non-governmental organisations and governmental departments participated in the two hour-long discussion. Controversial requirements Among the new controversial requirements in the pipeline is for owners to obtain permission from their immediate neighbours. Another regulation, which has got dog lovers howling in protest, is the inclusion of the rottweiler (photo) as one of the eight 'prohibited' breeds. The new regulations come following an incident in Puchong in March where nine-year-old Mohd Hazman Khan Sheikh Zaini received 189 stitches after being mauled by a rottweiler. During the dialogue, Zaba repeatedly told participants that the council did not want such incidences to occur in Shah Alam. However, Thanasayan said both the new and old regulations reflected the council's faulty understanding of dogs and reasons for those 'isolated' incidents in which they attack humans. Proper training, care and attention can effectively rule out violent attacks which usually result from the negligence and maltreatment of dogs by their owners, he explained. He also said the council did not properly consider the service that dogs, including Rottweilers, provide to the disabled, the elderly and the social and emotional development of children. " Throughout the dialogue, the plight of the disabled was only incidentally discussed because we were there. The factor of children was not even mentioned, " he noted. " My Rottweiller, whom I acquired 10 years ago, gave me a new lease of life. It has given me the ability to live outside of my home, " he added. Futile exercise Dean of Universiti Putra Malaysia's veterinary hospital Dr Ragavan Koran said his department had always welcomed the idea of cooperating with MBSA to hold training courses for dog-owners. " We're prepared at any time to embark on such cooperation, " he said, but expressed little optimism about it actually happening based on what transpired at the dialogue. Malaysian Association for Responsible Pet Ownership (Marpo) pro-tem president Dr Jon S Satyamoorthy said the council's inability to move beyond stereotypes of dogs and the danger they posed was also a problem. Despite Za'ba suggesting otherwise, he doubted that the council's stand and regulations represented the views of the majority of Muslims in Shah Alam. The dialogue itself seemed to be a futile exercise as there was no a genuine exchange of ideas and information, he added. Foster harmony At a press conference after the dialogue session, Za'ba said there was nothing new apart from the two new points in the regulations. Acquiring neighbours consent, he added, would lead to a more harmonious community " as neighbours would be aware of the presence of a dog and the type of dog " . He also said that the council " may consider " loosening the regulations for the disabled and elderly. Among the other conditions are that only those who live in " single-storey houses, corner terrace-houses, factories and executive clubs " can own dogs, the number of which is restricted to two. Dog-owners must also have kennels, signboards, and must always ensure that the surroundings of the kennels are kept clean. When taken out, dogs must be muzzled. As for the muzzles, several participants pointed out that this was another glaring example of MBSA's ignorance on the matter. They explained that some dogs when muzzled would not be able to pant and this would lead to overheating and possible death. Za'ba also said that a committee would be set up to scrutinise the dog-licensing regulations in a more exhaustive manner. The committee will comprise Mapro executive committee members, MBSA councillors and heads of the veterinary department. Za'ba said the Selangor state government and Ministry of Housing and Local Government would formulate guidelines on dog-ownership that would serve as policy directives for local councils throughout the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.