Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 South China Morning Post Saturday, February 25, 2006 U-turn means owners can keep pet birds MARY ANN BENITEZ Bird owners may keep their pets after all, the government said yesterday, in a policy U-turn ahead of a judicial review of its poultry ban sought by the Heung Yee Kuk. The move will affect chickens, ducks, geese, quails and pigeons kept as pets by owners who failed to apply for an exemption through a so- called " exhibition licence " by the time the ban came into force on February 13. Only 228 applications for such licences have been made, mostly by racing-pigeon breeders. Last night, the kuk said it would apply on Monday for a judicial review of the ban, which it believes contravened the Basic Law's protection of property rights. Owners who hid their pets for fear of confiscation will now be allowed to keep them until the birds die, according to Deputy Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Eddy Chan Yuk-tak. " It is not a licence ... [but for] those who have not asked for a licence, we will go for a grandfather clause, " Mr Chan said. The " grandfather clause " would exempt people who had kept poultry as pets before the new law went into force on February 13, so long as they had put in place " appropriate biosecurity measures " . Mr Chan said that because the H5N1 virus that causes bird flu was constantly mutating, the exemption could be restricted. " In future, if we have evidence showing that pigeons are also infected with H5N1, then we may not be able to allow the pigeon owners to continue keeping their pigeons, " he said at a meeting of the Legislative Council bills subcommittee examining amendments to the backyard-poultry ban. " We understand that this is a free community and different people may like different pets, " he said. A statement from the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau said the move was made after taking into consideration poultry owners' requests. Over the past 12 days, 38 households have been found to be keeping illegal poultry. A total of 235 chickens and 69 other birds have been confiscated and killed. Saturday, February 25, 2006 Poultry payout policy riles lawmakers They say the government is failing to give a straight answer on why it won't compensate owners of backyard chickens MARY ANN BENITEZ and MARTIN WONG Southern District councillor Shek Kwok-keung holds up a banner in the Legislative Council that reads: " Dictatorial policy deprives people of their right to raise pets " . As spokesman for the Anti-Bird-Flu Action Alliance, he said the government was failing to adopt consistent policies. Picture by Martin Chan Legislators yesterday accused the government of constantly changing its rationale for rejecting calls to compensate owners of backyard chickens. Cheung Hok-ming, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, said the government had previously cited cost as the reason. " The government said they did not want to delay the legislative exercise because the arguments would centre on the amount, " he told the bills subcommittee scrutinising proposed amendments governing the licensing of poultry kept at home. But Mr Cheung said what he was hearing yesterday was public health considerations. " Money is not mentioned. " Democrat Andrew Cheng Kar-foo said officials had previously claimed that if they offered compensation, it could induce people to smuggle in chickens to surrender for compensation. " Now you want to avoid compensation because you want to avoid any arguments. Who would argue with you if you wanted to pay $40 or $50 compensation per chicken? " Mr Cheng said. Deputy Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Eddy Chan Yuk-tak said the government had been firm from the beginning about not paying compensation. He defended the decision to ban the keeping at home of more than 20 chickens but to allow exemptions for flocks of racing pigeons. " Our experience tells us that pigeons are less likely to be infected with avian flu and so we will see what assistance we can give to pigeon owners on the basis of existing legislation, " Mr Chan said. " We have no intention of killing the pigeons. We are not going to cull the pigeons on a massive scale. " The government is also considering how much to charge for a licence to keep poultry at home - saying it will be " reasonable " . Circuses and Ocean Park pay $10,000 for " exhibition licences " to keep animals and birds. Representatives of pet-bird owners and animal welfare groups told the subcommittee the ban on keeping poultry at home was counterproductive, as pet owners had been hiding their animals. Fiona Woodhouse, deputy director of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said the ban would make owners of pet birds " even more reluctant to surrender their birds " . The Anti-Bird-Flu Action Alliance criticised the government's " ever- changing " decisions. " Today, it announces one decision. Tomorrow, it will announce another one. We just can't trust the government any more, " Shek Kwok- keung, spokesman for the alliance and a Southern District councillor, said. a.. A male two-way permit holder, who was found operating an illegal poultry slaughtering factory in Yuen Long was yesterday sentenced to three months' jail and fined $2,000 by Tuen Mun Court. He was convicted of operating an unlicensed food factory, keeping livestock without a licence, and breaching conditions of stay, a spokesman for the Environmental Hygiene Department said. Government officers raided the illegal abattoir in Kai Pak Leng, Yuen Long, last week and seized 1,000 live chickens and 80 slaughtered birds. Ban rethink February 3, 2006: Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food York Chow Yat-ngok announces that a ban on backyard poultry farming will take effect within one or two weeks and measures will be taken to ensure the strict enforcement of laws prohibiting chicken smuggling. February 8: Amendments to the Public Health (Animals and Birds) Regulations are gazetted to outlaw the keeping of live poultry at home. People who keep poultry at home are told they will need a licence. February 13: Agriculture, health and environmental protection departments send out inspection teams to seize poultry from backyard farmers and those who keep poultry at home. February 17: Heung Yee Kuk vows to seek a judicial review of the government's ban on backyard poultry. February 24: Health, Welfare and Food Bureau indicates it is studying the feasibility of allowing people who had been keeping poultry as pets before the ban to continue as before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.