New! The Nathan Winograd Interview - Protecting No-Kill Shelters

[Guest guest]

NEW! The Nathan Winograd Interview - Protecting No-Kill Shelters

 

He's vegan. His attitude is enlightened and revolutionary towards

pound animals. His successes to date have been remarkable. Nathan

Winograd is the guru of no-kill sheltering in the world today. He

once said, " Once a fringe movement dismissed by the status quo, the no-kill

movement is now only the legitimate standard for animal sheltering " .

No Kill is also the only legitimate standard for the animal rights

movement to embrace as well. If the AR Movement refuses to embrace

No-Kill options for all animals then not only will it have a

credibility problem on its hands but also, if neglected, this one

thing alone will plant the seed for the destruction of the

continuance of the animal rights movement. Here he speaks with the Abolitionist.

 

READ IT AT: www.abolitionist-online.com

 

Here's a taste of what's in store:

 

" I am an ethical vegan and I don't think that's necessary to be a

shelter director but you really want people who love animals and who

hurt by the killing and if you hurt by the killing you will stop at

nothing to save lives. "

 

" I don't think most people know about PETA's position. I have a copy

of a postcard Ingrid sent me back in 1992/3 where she says she does

not believe in 'a right for life' for feral cats and she does have a

policy against No-Kill shelters and there's the whole thing about the

pitbulls. "

" Her position is these animals should be dead even in the face of

life saving alternatives. Because of that, PETA have stopped making sense to us

as vegans, as animal rights people, as animal lovers and we have chosen to focus

on other groups that have a more enlightened stance when it comes to cats and

dogs. "

 

" {PETA} have a policy against No-Kill shelters and, my best guess is,

that their founder Ingrid Newkirk rose from the ranks of animal

control at the Washington Humane Society and actually spent a good

part of her career killing animals instead of protecting them. "

 

" As early as the mid- 1970's the Humane Society of the United States

(HSUS) and all those large groups were opposing the very types of

efforts that made San Francisco so incredibly successful. In fact

right after San Francisco did achieve success the HSUS started

vilification campaigns against no-kill. I believe there's a body

count attached to their anti no-kill rhetoric and positions. "

 

Also the Corrine Daws Interview: Making Sydney No-Kill

 

" In the last 10 years at my No-Kill Pound I have not once

looked at a dog and thought, " You are a horrible dog. You don't

deserve a home. You deserve to die " " .

 

www.abolitionist-online.com