Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

fire department charges for rescues

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

> *Rescuing animals has become an expensive affair for animal

>lovers with fire department officials in Kalyan and Dombivli

>charging Rs 150 as fees for their services*

 

 

The surprising aspect of this article is not that the fire

department in Mumbai is charging a small fee to do animal rescues,

but rather that it does animal rescues in the first place.

 

Despite the traditional image of firefighters rescuing

animals, which was already in place when the first U.S. humane

societies were formed in the mid-19th century, most fire departments

in most places have long been under orders to refuse to do animal

rescues.

 

The reasons are multiple: the risk of firefighters being

injured, the risk of firefighting equipment being occupied by an

animal rescue when a fire breaks out, the expense of answering

animal rescue calls, and political concern about a possible public

perception that doing animal rescues might be wasting tax funds.

 

I am a former firefighter--briefly in Alaska, and for

several years in Quebec, where I fought fires with at least four

different companies. None of them were officially allowed to do

animal rescue other than in connection with fighting barn fires and

searching buildings to rescue possible human victims.

 

Unofficially, most of the fire captains could always think

of a reason to handle an animal call, including as a training

exercise in preparation for helping humans. Mostly this involved

search-and-rescue activity, such as helping to collect strayed

cattle and horses after a fence break. Sometimes, though, the

rescues actually did involve fire.

 

My most memorable involvement in animal rescue as a

firefighter came during the very last fire I ever fought, in January

1989. A small house went up like a rocket just at dawn from an

overheated stovepipe.

 

I was jogging several miles away when I saw the smoke, and

cut cross-country over frozen ditches and ponds to arrive just ahead

of the first fire engine. It looked completely hopeless, not least

because a power pole had also caught fire, and a live wire had

fallen into the melted snow and ice around the burning house. We

couldn't get within 50 yards until the power was cut off at the

nearest junction box, because the line was visibly arcing.

 

By the time we were able to do anything, we felt certain

that anyone inside was long since dead. We were a very grim and

silent lot of firefighters.

 

Suddenly, as our hoses cleared flames away from a downstairs

window that we thought might be a bedroom, a black cat came flying

out, landed at my feet, and after skidding right up against me,

went racing 100 yards to the next closest house and right inside. I

had seen enough to know that although the cat's fur was singed, she

was essentially okay.

 

With a cheer, we charged forward right into that fire and

did a room-to-room search on our hands and knees, looking for any

other survivors.

 

There were none, but that black cat reminded us that a

firefighter never gives up. We saved the cat, at least, with a few

blasts of water, and that made us all feel quite a bit better.

 

 

 

--

Merritt Clifton

Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE

P.O. Box 960

Clinton, WA 98236

 

Telephone: 360-579-2505

Fax: 360-579-2575

E-mail: anmlpepl

Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

 

[ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing

original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide,

founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the

decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations.

We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year;

for free sample, send address.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> ³Despite the traditional image of firefighters rescuing

> animals, which was already in place when the first U.S. humane

> societies were formed in the mid-19th century, most fire departments

> in most places have long been under orders to refuse to do animal

> rescues.²

>

> Merritt,

>

> Thank you for the great story about saving the black cat‹and for your very

> good point that in some countries fire departments are not expected to, or not

> allowed to, rescue animals.

>

> People in India often have much higher expectations concerning the rightness

> and duty to save animals.

>

> Living in a society like India, where there is at least a tradition of valuing

> animals (even though that doesn¹t always carry through in practice to daily

> life) is something to be grateful for. At least the concept of having a duty

> towards animals is already understood.

>

> This is an interesting concept. In the U.S., we may speak of being kind to

> animals, or of not being cruel or abusive, but how often do we phrase this in

> terms of having a duty or an obligation towards animals?

>

>

> Sharon St. Joan

International Writer and Consultant

Bird and Wildlife Specialist

Best Friends Network

Best Friends Animal Society

http://network.bestfriends.org

http://international.bestfriends.org

http://india.bestfriends.org

sharonsj

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear all,

 

Thank you for your replied & sorry for my late reply.

 

Merrit Nice write-up about your experiance. some 5 years ago I experienced same

thing when PAWS Trustee Ms. Anjali Ekbote phoned me that one cat we she

sterlised @ home was stuck up on pavment of window on 4th floor. Cat was so

scared that she could not come out neither she could jump down.

 

I called fire brigade, They put large rope tied to one fire fighter & send him

on pavement. Then he softly picked-up the cat & thrown him down. Down other

firefighters caught him in on big spreaded bedsheet.

 

The cat was frightened @ entire episode but when he saw our trustee anjali, he

just jumped in her hands.

 

Our Fire brigade always helps animals. When I have to rescue a cow lying injured

on rail track, I bring my ambulance, but always call firebrigade as they have

huge ropes for the same.

Animal welfare is not my profession & I do full time job in multinational

corporation www.asbi.co.in

So when myself on job & no other PAWS volunteer is available to attend the snake

call, we forward the call to Fire brigade, surprisingly 2 of the fire fighters

have professional training

of rescuing snakes & wild birds.

 

Not only this, but our fire brigade do have special designed Bird / Snake boxes

where these rescued animals are kept. Police, Municipal offecials forward direct

calls to them to rescue birds.

Then after rescuing them, they hand it over to us.

 

All these years we worked with them & suddenly they started charging money.

It is small for us but people who calls from slums cannot afford 150/- also. So

it might happen that the caller may not call fire brigde to rescue it.

 

I just given to press so that they will re-think about their desision. As far as

money is concern, the fire brigade is properly paid for all their annual set-up.

There is no additional burden on them.

As post treatment of rescued animals is taken by us (PAWS) since past half

decade.

 

Thank You All!

 

@ end I am always grateful for their hard work, interest in animals

& round-the-clock ready to help animals. Without their support, it would have

been difficult for us to help animals.

 

Hope they soon change the decesion.

 

 

Regards,

--

Nilesh Bhanage

+91 9820161114

www.pawsasia.org

 

On 7/25/07, Sharon St. Joan <sharonsj wrote:

>

> > ³Despite the traditional image of firefighters rescuing

> > animals, which was already in place when the first U.S. humane

> > societies were formed in the mid-19th century, most fire departments

> > in most places have long been under orders to refuse to do animal

> > rescues.²

> >

> > Merritt,

> >

> > Thank you for the great story about saving the black cat‹and for your

> very

> > good point that in some countries fire departments are not expected to,

> or not

> > allowed to, rescue animals.

> >

> > People in India often have much higher expectations concerning the

> rightness

> > and duty to save animals.

> >

> > Living in a society like India, where there is at least a tradition of

> valuing

> > animals (even though that doesn¹t always carry through in practice to

> daily

> > life) is something to be grateful for. At least the concept of having a

> duty

> > towards animals is already understood.

> >

> > This is an interesting concept. In the U.S., we may speak of being kind

> to

> > animals, or of not being cruel or abusive, but how often do we phrase

> this in

> > terms of having a duty or an obligation towards animals?

> >

> >

> > Sharon St. Joan

> International Writer and Consultant

> Bird and Wildlife Specialist

> Best Friends Network

> Best Friends Animal Society

> http://network.bestfriends.org

> http://international.bestfriends.org

> http://india.bestfriends.org

> sharonsj <sharonsj%40bestfriends.org>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...