Guest guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 I could not bring myself to watch the video. There is no point in singling out any one country. Attempting to condemn a whole country is counter productive and misses the point.There are good and bad in each and no country has the moral high ground when it comes to how we treat animals. I know an elderly Chinese lady who refuses to eat beef because her best friend as a child was the family buffalo and when I studied in China a number of years ago I found people who had empathy towards animals. People are working towards trying to improve the lot of animals in China as elsewhere. Encouraging every small positive action is what is needed. Chris Osborn Perth Australia - Merritt Clifton aapn Tuesday, June 26, 2007 1:07 PM RE: FW: What a SICK SICK World. >We have made captures of the video and put these on several popular blogs in >Thailand with the link to the video and a short explanation on how China is >the most disgusting country in the world This is grossly unfair. As ANIMAL PEOPLE editorially pointed out in April 2006: While China as yet has no anti-cruelty law, and is notorious for the cruelties inflicted on animals at live markets and on fur farms, horrified individual Chinese citizens responded remarkably quickly during the first week in March 2006 when so-called " crush " or " squish " videos surfaced on a Chinese web site. Similar material came to light in the U.S. and Britain in mid-1997. Investigations by British Customs, the Royal SPCA, Animal Rights Online host Susan Roghair, AnimalTalk host Dick Weevil, Ohio animal rights attorney Shawn Thomas, the Suffolk County SPCA, and ANIMAL PEOPLE eventually converged, exchanged notes, and led to the convictions of seven perpetrators between 1999 and 2002. Elapsed time: five years, while the videos remained in distribution. In China, web surfers rapidly identified the " actress " who stomped a kitten to death as hospital nurse Wang Jue, of northern Heilongjiang province, and posted her personal data, along with that of the videographer. Wang Jue lost her job. The producer, identified as Luobei Television cameraman Li Yuejun, wrote a published apology and self-criticism. The state-run China Daily took the opportunity to editorially argue for a national cruelty law. With public opinion clearly and vociferously opposed to cruelty, State Forestry Administration director of wildlife and plant protection Zhou Rongsheng announced regulations to improve the care of animals on fur farms and prohibit live skinning. Certainly much cruelty goes on in China, but China is scarcely unique in either practicing or amplifying depraved videography. The fellow who posted the message to which I am responding, who has an outstanding personal record on both animal and human rights issues, happens to come from the Netherlands. He now lives in Thailand. Some Dutch citizens and residents have been integrally involved in producing, distributing, and promoting some of the most depraved pornography ever produced, including extreme cruelty to both animals and human children. Thailand is among the international hubs of the worst forms of human and animal trafficking, and has a thriving albeit illegal dog meat industry. Does that make either the Netherlands or Thailand among the most disgusting countries in the world? Of course not. As a whole, both the Netherlands and Thailand have good records on most animal and human rights issues--but every nation seems to have a certain percentage of deeply warped and worthless people, who exploit the most vulnerable creatures around them. Some may be better at dealing with the creeps than others, but in general, the more peaceable and decently inclined the majority of people are, the more the worst people can get away with before being called to account. -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.