Guest guest Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 2007: World Society for the Protection of Animals Members Manual Looseleaf binder & CD formats - 348 pages. Annual membership fee: $80.00. http://www.wspa-usa.org/pages/1948_becoming_a_u_s_member_society.cfm As " Go forth and multiply! " is the first commandment of survival for institutions and causes, as well as species, some of the first publications of the earliest British and American humane societies were essays encouraging sympathizers in distant places to organize in a similar manner. The 348-page WSPA Members Manual is probably the most ambitious such effort yet. It draws liberally from many other humane how-to publications, not always with acknowledgement. Each chapter ends with an extensive list of further information sources. The first portion of the WSPA Members Manual makes a laudable yet perversely backward effort to inform animal advocates about the history and philosophical antecedents of the cause. Unfortunately, especially since the WSPA Members Manual is meant to inspire and encourage humane work in developing nations, the list of " Historical Milestones in the Animal Protection Movement " begins in 1781, and includes mostly British developments. One paragraph acknowledges the mid-19th century formation of the first U.S. humane societies. Passing mentions are made of Germany, Switzerland, and the European Union. Of the rest of the world, there is just a note that " Colonial influences led to setting up many SPCA-like organizations in Asia, South America, and Africa. " This omits that the first humane societies in Britain were hugely influenced and partially modeled after the pro-animal teachings and temple animal sanctuaries that some of the founders had encountered while doing military service in India. The ANIMAL PEOPLE Chronology of Humane Progress by contrast starts in 1300 B.C. and includes notice of developments in many different parts of the world. The WSPA Members Manual discussion of " Ethical and Philosophical Views " and a " Summary of Philosophical Beliefs " focus on European philosophers, with passing notice of some contemporary Americans. Only after that does the manual acknowledge the pro-animal teachings within major religions, giving Hinduism two paragraphs and Buddhism just one--with about the same number of words as a paragraph on Greek Orthodoxy. After this intensively ethnocentric opening, the WSPA Members Manual presents a series of glossaries of terms used in humane work, explaining key concepts, such as the importance of reducing the carrying capacity of urban habitat in trying to control populations of street dogs and feral cats. Most of this material is quite useful, and some of it does a fair job of presenting conflicting perspectives on problematic issues. But more oddness is ahead. For example, there is considerable discussion of how to choose a mission, after starting an organization. This is completely inverse to how humane societies form. ANIMAL PEOPLE has assisted in the formation of countless humane organizations, in all parts of the world. Almost always, they start with the perception of a job needing to be done, and grow from there into recognizing that an organization must be created to do it. If a humane society has to choose a mission, it is usually because the society is already performing multiple missions, and realizes that it cannot do them all well. The choice is deciding what to give up--and often involves creating a new organization to take over the role that has to be jettisoned. The WSPA Members Manual also talks at length about forming committees to do this and that, and about many other aspects of management which simply do not occur in start-up organizations. Some of this material may be relevant to humane societies that have already grown to significant size, but most of it is quite out-of-touch with the realities of small organizations, in which very little can be delegated to anyone other than the founders. The World Society for the Protection of Animals, as the WSPA Members Manual explains, " was created in 1981 through the merger of the World Federation for the Protection of Animals, founded in 1953, and the International Society for the Protection of Animals, founded in 1959. " Both WFPA and ISPA were formed specifically to encourage humane societies to go forth and multiply, after their numbers had been woefully depleted throughout Europe and the Pacific Rim by fascist repression and World War II. After initial great success in western Europe, where humane institutions were mostly rebuilt on battered but structurally sound foundations, the WSPA parent societies and later WSPA itself refocused on Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Missionaries Typically they worked with institutions begun by religious missionaries, for example Alice Manning, whose estate indirectly enabled the Massachusetts SPCA to found ISPA as a subsidiary. Not surprisingly, WFPA, ISPA, and eventually WSPA followed the missionary model. For decades they sent experts abroad to try to start humane societies organized in emulation of British and American societies, just as missionaries go forth to found churches. The typical outcome was that the new humane societies would last only as long as outside funding did, and then implode, having utterly failed to develop local support. The political and economic instability of many developing nations further sabotaged colonization efforts--and so did a penchant for trying to work with corrupt or ineffective governments, seeking quick-fix " victories " that could be touted to western donors, instead of building a broad base of local support. The 1990s changed the paradigm. First, the institutions ancestral to WSPA had been most successful working in the technologically developed but war-blighted nations of western Europe. The fall of Communism in eastern Europe opened up a similar opportunity for WSPA and other outreach organizations, helping to rebuild and restart organizations which sometimes had existed at least in name since the 19th century. Usually, though, the eastern European societies were starting from scratch, with no resources or institutional experience, even if they had old charters. Third World conditions prevailed, from animal care to economic management--and often still prevail, despite increasing animal advocacy. Killing impounded dogs and cats by any cheap means, in order to sell their fur, is no longer as openly done as in the Communist era, but is still often reported. Corruption in eastern European humane work is no longer as flagrant as when the alleged human trafficker Wolfgang Ullrich raised and stole as much as $45 million in funds donated to help animals, mostly in Romania, before a German court sent him to prison. Yet humane societies are still struggling with the Ullrich-era legacy. Hangovers from it include bitterly disenchanted western donors; rival organizations flamboyantly accusing each other of corruption; restrictions on the export of dogs for adoption from some nations, imposed because some dogs were allegedly covertly sold to laboratories; and prohibitions on using veterinary drugs which might also be used in " date rape, " and are still extensively used in human trafficking. The WSPA Members Manual does not discuss what to do about working under such shadows. But it exists partly because some members have found ways. Just a few years ago a case could be made that the most successful outcome of humane outreach to post-Communist eastern Europe was the growth of some of the institutions begun to do it. Among them were the Humane Society International division of the Humane Society of the U.S., which moved out into the rest of the world after initial outreach to Russia and Romania; the Austrian multi-national animal charity Vier Pfoten; and the International Companion Animal Welfare Conference. But, scattered throughout eastern Europe, upstart groups often begun by student activists five to 10 years ago have matured with their leadership, developed constituencies, and--usually beginning with little or no physical infrastructure--have become world leaders in developing Internet-based campaigns. An alphabetical roster would run from Animal Rights Croatia to VITA, of Moscow, and would include at least one group in almost every former Iron Curtain nation. While WSPA and other multi-national animal charities focused on eastern Europe, Internet-savvy young people also started an unprecedented proliferation of humane organizations around the economically booming Pacific Rim, with remarkably little outside help. The International Fund for Animal Welfare had pursued the missionary approach to building humane societies in several Pacific Rim nations during the 1980s, but retrenched just before the boom began. Founded by former IFAW representative Jill Robinson, the comparatively tiny Animals Asia Foundation has been the most influential multinational humane society involved in the emergence of indigenous Asian animal advocacy, but as an exemplar, showing others how to do things, rather than trying to direct the action. Finally, the Indian animal advocacy movement has emerged into global influence, even though there is not, as yet, even one genuinely national animal charity in India. The closest approach is People for Animals, a constellation of loosely linked locally autonomous animal charities begun by Maneka Gandhi in 1984. Through the Asia for Animals conference series, begun in 2001, the Asian Animal Protection Network online news and discussion group, begun in 1996, and increasing involvement in international programs, Indian animal advocacy leaders have discovered that they have a wealth of ideas and experience to share that often translate into models more applicable to other developing nations than the teachings of the western missionaries. The organizational task ahead for WSPA, as " the world's largest international federation of animal protection organizations, with over 650 societies in more than 140 counties, " as the introduction touts, is to make the transition from being a missionary institution to becoming a genuinely globally representative body. This includes learning from the membership outside Britain and the U.S.--and acknowledging that the humane movement did not begin with the British Empire, much as British donors and organizations have done to further it. --Merritt Clifton -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.