Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 Dear all, After the Nov. 11 Beijing dog lovers protest against arbitrary dog killing, the Chinese government turns out sophistical clarification and refuting dog owners' earnest claims. It is such an impudicity that they are trying to avoid the important but dwell on the trivial: '...the security officers were simply implementing the new regulation, by urging citizens to give up second dogs or aggressive dogs. They revealed that the bureau's special office that is managing the registration of dogs has taken in a total of 500 stray dogs and family dogs that are temporarily detained, by November 13th.' '...the strict implementation of the dog-control measures mainly aims to solve nine prominent problems, including the raising of large or vicious dogs, unlicensed dogs, one household owning more than one dog, and owners bringing their dogs to public places.' (Quoted from: http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/2946/2006/11/14/176 (AT) 162699 (DOT) htm) 'Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau had hauled in a total of 500 dogs. The dogs mainly include those abandoned by owners, unlicensed pets and stray ones. Most of the dogs were unlicensed and their owners gave them up of their own accord.' 'Once sent here, each dog will be registered, given an ID number and quarantined, the official said. The healthy ones will be sent to an adoption department to await new owners.' (Quoted from: http://www.china.org.cn/english/China/188916.htm) First, solving the problems, such as rabies, bites, public disturbance and pollution, is true and doubtless. But do they dare to allege that their dog-control policies and measures are reasonable, scientific and humane? Are all big dogs exceeding 35cm vicious? Do those families have to give up their registered, vaccinated companions only because one dog policy? Do those no rabies, never bite, mild-temper pet dogs, but only grown big or not the only dog child, deserve the treatment of detaining and supposedly putting down? The main reasons of unlicensed dog are no other than the extremely expensive of registration fee, and unconquerable 35cm standard. There are huge many dog owners seeking legal identities for their dog companions but failed. Many owners have same experiences that when those big breed dogs young, they registered and paid license fee, but when the dog grown up, they failed to renew the license then the dog became illegal. (http://www.china.org.cn/english/2006/Sep/181459.htm) Second, as to their excuse of none indoor seizure, someone said in a forum: it is actually seizing dogs or forcing the owner to give up when the police made the house-to-house call. It is never a simply publicity. Someone even called the police to ask what if their dog is pregnant, then got the answer is no way for them to keep and must give the baby dog for their disposal! ( http://home.ani8.com/bbs/dispbbs.asp?boardID=30 & ID=6823 & page=1) Regard to their disposal, in Chinese version of the news, (http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2006-11-14/015311503814.shtml) it only gives as little as 7 days for the dog's adoption period. After that short period, the dogs are definitely being killed; the methods are said according to international convention. How transitory the life given to those poor dogs is! Few of the original owners or any other possible adopters could manage to save those lives. Just think about that many innocent dogs are given the death sentences only because of the absurd standard and policy. How could they deny it is not a 'dog slaughtering campaign'? Is there any difference between concentration camp and the dog detention house, when the reason of detaining is arbitrary and cruel? A picture http://kissdolphin.blogbus.com/index.html with the original attached words translated from Chinese: To every dads and mums please send your deepest blessing, with tearful broken heart, to .... I plead with Qi Li Qu concentration camp for humanely and peacefully putting away the dogs; never let them feel fear and pain! (Qi Li Qu is the place officially revealed as the place for those recently detained dogs, pictures for that http://bbs3.btbbt.com/viewthread.php?tid=1157047 there is address in Chinese: Beijing Canine Inspection Centre, West City Ward, Qi LI Qu, Chang Ping, Sand River) Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.