Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 This is an updated version of a similar statement I distributed on March 3, incorporating the very latest dog bite date available from both the U.S. and India. The latest estimate of dog bites receiving hospital treatment in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention in Atlanta, is 4.7 million per year, from a population of 70 million dogs and 300 million humans. Thus 7% of U.S. dogs bite someone seriously enough each year that the bites receive hospital treatment, and 1.5% of the human population are bitten seriously: one person per 63.8. The Association for Prevention and Control of Rabies estimates that 1.74 million people receive hospital treatment for bites per year in India, out of populations of 25 million dogs and 1.1 billion people. Thus 7% of Indian dogs bite someone seriously enough each year that the bites receive hospital treatment, and 1.58% of the human population are bitten seriously: one person per 63.2. These are substantially identical rates. In both nations, the public health authorities estimate that only about one bite victim in 10 actually seeks medical attention, chiefly because most bites cause only trivial injuries. This is of much greater concern in India than in the U.S., as India is still a nation with endemic rabies. The U.S. largely eradicated canine rabies nearly 50 years ago by vigorously promoting dog vaccination. ------------------------------- An intelligent assessment of the street dog situation in Bangalore should begin with several basic comparisons. The present population of street dogs, rates of dog attacks, and rates of rabies occurrence must be compared with the rates prior to the introduction of the Animal Birth Control programs, and to the present norms of India. In that regard, we find that that from the introduction of electrocution to kill dogs more than 70 years ago, until the start of the ABC programs, the street dog populations only continued to grow in proportion to the numbers of humans and amount of food refuse left by humans, no matter how many dogs were killed. Since the introduction of the ABC programs, the number of dogs has fallen 21%, from circa 70,000 to just over 56,000. Sterilizing dogs is in effect surgically immunizing them against pregnancy. Just as it is necessary to vaccinate at least 70% of an animal population to halt the spread of disease, in order to effect any reduction in the dog population, it is necessary to sterilize at least 70%. The Bangalore ABC programs appear to have reached the 70% target very quickly. On January 14 and 15, 2007, I personally canvassed several representative Bangalore neighborhoods on foot, counting dogs, finding that at least 70% of the dogs had been sterilized in all of them, ranging upward of 90% in some areas served by CUPA. I found unsterilized dogs and puppies in only two types of neighborhood. One was areas where large numbers of migrant construction workers were camping, cooking outdoors, and had brought dogs with them from the countryside. The other was areas which appeared to be within the city, but were in fact beyond the official city limits and the boundaries of the areas served by the ABC programs. I found large congregations of dogs exclusively in the vicinity of meat shops. Concerning rates of dog attack, at the above-stated rates, the expected number of attacks in Bangalore, a city of more than six million people, should be more than 95,000. Since Bangalore has only 25,000 bite cases to treat per year, the ABC programs appear to be preventing 74% of the caseload that should otherwise be expected. Concerning rabies risk, the ABC programs appear to have completely eliminated canine rabies in the areas of Bangalore that they have covered, as have the ABC programs of Chennai, Jaipur, and Visakhapatnam, among others, leaving a problem only in the areas that have not been covered. As the Bangalore ABC programs are clearly very successful in reducing dog numbers, dog attacks, and rabies incidence, the appropriate response of public officials to the recent dog attack fatalities should be to reinforce the ABC approach by permanently closing meat shops that do not properly dispose of their waste, and to provide additional funding and facilities to extend the ABC programs to the areas not presently served. In addition, Bangalore public officials should resolutely and outspokenly defend the ABC programs against irrational attacks from local demagogues who are calling for killing dogs, despite the overwhelming weight of evidence that this approach does not work, historically never has worked, and never will work. In that regard, I must note that historically, in many parts of the world, corrupt local political bosses have used a purported need to kill dogs as a pretext for putting their personal goondas and bag men on the public payroll. In the U.S., humane societies began doing animal control work more than 100 years ago as part of a movement to reform local politics. In view of this history, I believe the citizens of Bangalore should very closely inspect the activities and motives of the politicans who are now calling for hiring dog-killers. Just who do they really want to hire, why, and what is the underlying motive? -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.