Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: PAPER ON ECOLOGICAL IMPERIALISM

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

---------- Forwarded message ----------

 

Jun 11, 2006 7:58 AM

PAPER ON ECOLOGICAL IMPERIALISM

Lowlandgorilla

 

* http://ipn.lexi.net/images/uploaded/-403a1323d2df9--ecoimperialism.pdf

www.sdnetwork.net

 

Ecological Imperialism

 

A Sustainable Development Network Briefing Paper

*

 

Ecological imperialism - or ecoimperialism - is the imposition of a set of

ecological values held by one individual or group,

 

onto another individual or group, without their consent.

 

" [Prosperity] has formidable enemies, including most first-world

governments, leading academics and scientists, wealthy

 

foundations, thousands of NGOs, influential journalists, passionate

activists, and countless other powerful interests. These

 

forces constitute a new kind of colonialism, which we might call

eco-imperialism. It is more insidious, pervasive and

 

potentially more devastating than traditional imperialism. "

1*

 

Causes of ecoimperialism

*

 

The elaboration of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), which are

ostensibly intended to help

 

everyone, but actually hurt rich and poor alike

 

Overseas development funding, which is used as a carrot to entice poor

countries to sign MEAs, but often

 

leads to corruption and undermines democracy

 

The opposition to new technologies that might help the poor escape from

poverty, such as genetically

 

enhanced crop varieties, and old technologies, such as the pesticide DDT,

which is used to prevent malaria

 

Romanticization of poor rural lifestyles, which leads to opposition to the

consumption of energy and natural

 

resources.

*

 

Ecoimperialist claims

*

 

*The earth is running out of resources*. Human prosperity and wealth

causes an unsustainable usage of

 

resources and egregious environmental problems, so human consumption

patterns and activities should be

 

drastically changed. The poor should not use the same technologies nor

should they consume the same

 

amount of resources as people in wealthy countries. Likewise, people in

wealthy countries should be forced to

 

reduce consumption of energy and natural resources.

 

* " Appropriate " technologies*, such as wind energy and wind-up radios, are

the solution to poor people's needs.

 

The morally dubious notion that *ecological values should be imposed on

people living in poor countries* ,

 

whether the poor like it or not, is justified by the claim that, since rich

countries have despoiled the

 

environment, poor countries must not make the same mistakes.

 

*Future generations *are more important than people alive today. The

possibility that people in the future might

 

prefer to be rich than to have the privilege of sharing their land with a

colony of anopheles mosquitoes,

 

preserved through the kindness of their rich overlords, is simply ignored by

this breed of arrogant, ignorant

 

elitists.

*

 

Examples of eco-imperialism

*

 

The United Nations' Stockholm (POPs) Convention: The POPs Convention, if

ratified, will place onerous restrictions

 

on, and will eventually eliminate, the use and production of 12 chemicals

(called persistent organic pollutants -

 

" POPs " ) which are considered to be damaging to human health and the

environment. The Convention was driven by

 

a network of NGOs and governments who called these chemicals " the dirty

dozen " . Since rich countries have largely

 

eliminated POPs, they would not feel the effects of such a ban.

 

However, the world's poorest countries still depend on some of these

chemicals. DDT is one of the 12 POPs, and

 

is used as an effective and cheap method for malaria control in many

countries where malaria reigns. Restrictions

 

on its usage could be counted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, not to

mention the economic stagnation that

 

results from the increased burden of malaria.

 

Some countries (Belize, Mozambique, and Bolivia) have stopped using DDT in

their malaria control programs

 

because they fear losing the support of wealthy nations through aid - and

they have suffered a consequent loss of

 

human life.

 

1

http://www.irenkenya.org/articles/miracle_of_poverty_louw.htm*

 

www.sdnetwork.net

*

 

The POPs treaty will do little to improve human health in the developing

world. " Far more children die from a lack

 

of sanitation before they get a chance to be affected [by these chemicals]. "

2

 

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES): CITES

was signed in 1973 and came into

 

force two years later. CITES attempts to prevent the loss of endangered

species by imposing restrictions on

 

international trade in the species and their products (such as ivory and

rhino horn).

 

However, CITES does nothing to address habitat loss and degradation,

domestic consumption, or other

 

threats to wildlife or their habitat and in some cases, CITES may make

habitat conservation more difficult.

 

The effect of trade bans has done little to help the species they are

meant to protect - and in fact may

 

undermine wildlife conservation because it reduces the value of those

species to people who share land with

 

them.

 

" Kenyans remain spectators and victims of the modern form of

eco-imperialism – they are barred from using

 

their natural resource to satisfy outsiders who yet again patronize the

whole industry. "

3

 

" Kenya has applied the precautionary principle on wildlife for long

enough, plunging both individuals and the

 

country into poverty. What is urgently needed is the strengthening of the

institutions of justice to ensure rule of

 

law and devolving wildlife property rights to private ownership. Sport

hunting will cease to be a threat. Instead

 

of hunting being a risk, it will safeguard wildlife and make the locals

wealthy. "

4

 

CITES " fails to create mechanisms to control the supply of wildlife

products or any direct means to influence

 

consumer demand… [it] operates primarily as a restrictive mechanism, rather

than an enabling one. Implicit in

 

its existing structure is an assumption that all trade is somehow bad for

conservation unless proven otherwise.

 

Measures taken under CITES therefore tend to emphasize limitations on trade

rather than ways to facilitate

 

trade that may ultimately enhance the status of wild species. "

 

Fundamentally,

*ecoimperialism undermines the capacity of people to escape poverty, rather

than enabling

 

them to develop

*.

 

Ecoimperialism imposes a set of beliefs on people in poor countries,

through environmental regulations,

 

restrictions on trade, and through the fundamental belief that the global

elite should make decisions for

 

everyone else.

 

People in poor countries need *more development*, *more technology*, *more

resource consumption*, and *more

 

energy consumption

*- and they should reject ecoimperialism outright, just as they rejected

imperialism. People

 

everywhere should be empowered to make choices for their own lives - and not

be prevented from so doing

 

by people and governments in wealthy countries.

 

" People in developing countries should no longer be polite about, or be

influenced by, neo-imperial agendas.

 

Decent people, aware of the suffering inflicted by real poverty, should

agree on at least one simple principle:

 

that the most urgent priority is to achieve maximal growth and development.

The unknowable needs of future

 

generations and the attainment of a low-risk environment must, by any caring

calculus, be secondary. "

5

 

Contact: Kendra Okonski, Sustainable Development Network,

kendra

 

2

http://www.policynetwork.net/weekly_comment/richard_tren_july02.htm.

 

3

http://www.irenkenya.org/articles/shikwati_may2902.htm

 

4

http://www.irenkenya.org/articles/hunting_feb02.htm

 

5

http://www.irenkenya.org/articles/miracle_of_poverty_louw.htm

 

The Sustainable Development Network (SDN) is a global network of

organizations, whose mission is to encourage

 

policies which allow individuals to pursue their goals without bureaucratic

intervention. The SDN focuses on the

 

institutional framework within which people act, to ensure that policies

encourage individuals to make the best use

 

of resources and to protect the environment, while improving both their own

wellbeing and the wellbeing of others.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...