Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 thats the exact position of the ngos working very efficiently with little resources. has anybody realised that not the zoos has ever had their aim to rescue an animal if it was not of public issue like a tiger or a rhino or an elephant. the ones involved in the little that has been done in saving from pocked expenses is ngos. think if 15 zoos recognised by the CZA were asked to keep all those rescued from all other ngos or for that matter only CIRCUSes, will that do the job? we agree that wildlife rescue and rehabilitation has become a fad and everyday a new org registers itself somewhere in our country.but since its a ngo registered under soc. registration act no body can stop it be it a trading disguise or filthy place for media coverage. organisations old and reputed should be given priority over the zoos, looking at the damages done by the zoos to the wildlife than and even today. OR at least a helpline for the wildlife rescue in the state been widely publicly available by PETA or CZA or the forest dept from a snake to the elephant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.