Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 www.sentinelassam.com Wide support for forest land rights legislation New Delhi, Dec 15: Cutting across party lines, members in the Lok Sabha today supported a bill to grant forest land rights to tribals while objecting to unnecessary delay in implementation of the legislation. Initiating the debate on Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2006, as reported by the Joint Committee, Jual Oram (BJP) said government should have circulated the proposed amendments in time for study. Supporting the bill, he said government should put the Tribal Act in the Ninth schedule of the Constitution to protect it from future interventions. Lamenting that the " historical bill " had been delayed under the " tiger lobby " pressure, he said only two per cent of forest land would be affected by the legislation. The legislation would benefit lakhs of tribals and non-tribals residing in forests for centuries, Oram said. Madhusudan Mistry (Cong) urged government to include bamboo, sand and stone under minor forest produce while allowing their sale in the market. Bajn Ban Riyan (CPI-M) wondered how government would be be able to provide land rights to tribals and other dwellers in the absence of revenue records. Ramji Lal Suman (SP) and Ram Kripal Yadav (RJD) blamed nexus of land mafia and some forest officials for destroying forests. Describing the legislation as a watershed, Kiran Rijiju (BJP) asked the government to take steps to prevent illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in the northeast to take advantage of this law. Prabodh Panda (CPI) wanted the government to clarify the provisions relating to proof of occupancy of tribals and grant use of fuel wood and fish from water reservoirs. Maintaining that most of the historic tribal struggles were fought over ownership of forest land, Rameshwar Oraon (Cong) asserted tribals and forests were " inseparable " . He said the proposal to have an army firing field near Netarhat in Jharkhand should be shelved as it would displace primitive tribal groups from over 200 villages in the area. Shailendra Kumar and Ravi Prakash Verma (both SP) said a " historic wrong " against forest dwelling tribals had been corrected through the bill and wanted stern action against forest officials harassing them. Bhubneswar Prasad Mehta (CPI) demanded a legislation to return land to tribals which was taken from them for development. Sandeep Dikshit (Cong) said an anti-tribal mindset was prevailing in the country and added the legislation when implemented fully would bring about a massive change, while Mahaveer Bhagora (BJP) sought the involvement of tribal representatives in forest expansion plans. (PTI) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.