Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 From The National Humane Review, September 1939, page 6: A Gruesome Case Food for humans, especially for the poor Chinese, is a problem in the war zone of the Far East. Two Chinese who did a lucrative business right in the Settlement at Shanghai, have just been sentenced to three months' imprisonment. An anonymous letter put the authorities wise to a nefarious business that had been going on for months. The men had been collecting dogs and cats, stray and pets, slaughtered them and told the meat as " rabbit meat " quite openly from a stall. Hoardes of poor people had been daily patrons at the stand. Two baskets of meat were part of the evidence presented at the trial of the men on a charge of fraud. --------- The last word of the item above is the most significant. The crime was not selling dog and cat meat (even in the Settlement, which was the foreign-controlled part of town); it was misrepresenting it. I believe this uncredited item was probably authored by R.N. Swann, the then-director of the Hong Kong SPCA, who frequently submitted news items to the National Humane Review, and had a good reputation for getting his facts straight. (I verified another of his articles by finding a second source just today.) Assuming his facts were correct as stated above, the implications of the article include: 1) Eating dogs and cats was not widely accepted in Shanghai in 1939; 2) Dog meat and cat meat was not considered a luxury item. 3) Dog meat and cat meat had to be disguised in order to be sold. 4) The deception was a prosecutable offense. 5) Dogs and cats have been eaten in & around Shanghai for a much shorter time than has been generally believed. Otherwise, the perpetrators had no reason to commit fraud in order to sell dog and cat meat. -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.