Guest guest Posted June 5, 2007 Report Share Posted June 5, 2007 Link: http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=jun0507\edit1 Editorial The tiger's tale It's a real matter of worry for the Forest Department, conservationists and all the people conscious about the environmental reality of Assam. The tiger, one of the most endangered animals inhabiting the region is enduring a struggle for existence, and ironically the Forest Department is not in a position to state the number of tigers in the various Protected Areas of the State at present. As of now, the most it could rely is on the 2000 estimation that reveals 353 tigers in the wild. To what extent that has changed till 2007 is anybody's guess. There are even doubts if the total number of the 2000 census was correct, because even some high ranking officials think of it as exaggerated. For instance the number of tigers in Manas stated to be 65 is difficult to believe because the National Park did not have the prey base to sustain that kind of tiger population when the census was carried out. Moreover, the 89 tigers, which were supposed to be outside Protected Areas is another big question mark that requires critical attention. There are reasons to believe that some of the figures were on the higher side because of erroneous surveying methods or because there was a desire to show a healthy tiger population in the State. The present situation, where no correct and updated data on tiger population exists has thrown up a set of challenges to the Forest Department and conservationists. Without correct baseline data, it would be difficult if not impossible to plan any project for tiger conservation. The formulation of strategic approach, resource and manpower allocation would all require correct data on tiger population. In 2006, a new estimation was carried out in Assam, but the results of that are still not in the public domain. According to reports, the project has now run into problems and results could only be expected by the end of this year. In such a backdrop, can we expect the most recent estimate, based on a methodology developed by the Wildlife Trust of India, to be an honest attempt to at least provide a correct estimation? Perhaps some more time for the project could be justifiable, but it must reduce the margin of errors of previous census. The new estimate, if it provides accurate data, would make us aware of the number of tigers surviving in the wild and where they exist despite increasing human pressure. It would, no less importantly, also indicate the few ecosystems, which are in relatively better health and those, which would require better conservation measures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.