Thought to Exist In The Wild: Awakening from the Nightmare of Zoos

[Guest guest]

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, October 2007:

 

 

Thought to Exist In The Wild: Awakening from the Nightmare of Zoos

by Derrick Jensen, with photos by Karen Tweedy-Holmes

No Voice Unheard (P.O. Box 4171, Santa Cruz, CA 95063), 2007.

143 pages, paperback. $19.95.

 

 

Hallmarks of hate literature are that it draws a distinction

between us and them, asserts that all of them are like the worst of

them, and concludes that none of them should be tolerated.

Many an insightful critique of zoos has appeared in recent

decades, but Thought to Exist In The Wild is not among them. Thought

to Exist In The Wild is essentially hate literature. Author Derrick

Jensen hates zoos, all zoos. Acknowledging little significant

difference among zoos, Jensen traces the origins of modern zoos to

Roman spectacles, likens zoos to pornography, and argues that zoos

exist chiefly to celebrate the human conquest of nature.

Roman spectacles certainly had parallels, on a much smaller

scale, in the baiting and other animal torture that made the Tower

Menagerie notorious for many of the 600 years that it existed in

London as the most prominent proto-zoo in Europe. In 1832 the Tower

Menagerie animal collection was transferred to the newly opened

London Zoo. The London Zoo, populated by rare species from British

colonies, was more-or-less ancestral to most major zoos today.

However, this was scarcely a matter of linear descent.

Nearly 1,000 years separated Roman spectacles from the Tower

Menagerie, and the Tower Menagerie existed for almost a century

before the first record of intentional abuses occurring there. After

that, there were epochs of sadism and of attempted good animal care,

reflecting the shifting attitudes of the ruling British monarchs,

the people they put in charge, and the visiting public.

Meanwhile, as zoo historian, architect, and critic David

Hancocks recounted in A Different Nature (2001), in the 16th

century " The Mogul emperor Akbar the Great established zoos in

various Indian cities which...provided spacious enclosures and cages,

built in large reserves. Each had a resident doctor, and Akbar

encouraged careful study of animals. His zoos were open to the

public. At the entrance to each he posted a message: 'Meet your

brothers. Take them to your hearts, and respect them.' "

Nearly 200 years after that, the remnants of Akbar's

zoos--among other aspects and institutions of India--appear to have

influenced British military officers who, upon returning home,

founded the London Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

in 1822, and made abolishing the Tower Menagerie one of their first

priorities.

The London Zoo, like Akbar's zoos, was founded to promote

education about animals and appreciation of nature, in an atmosphere

where women and children could feel safe. Like the London SPCA,

which became the Royal SPCA in 1840, the London Zoo was opened in an

effort to reduce public violence, and to try to mitigate the effects

of the Industrial Revolution on nature.

Of course the zookeepers did not get everything right. Of

course zookeepers are still rethinking, redesigning, and

re-evaluating their roles and messages. Of course the most

problematic aspect of zoos has always been that they are animal

prisons, if the animals realize that they are captives--and no issue

has more concerned the zoo community. Some zookeepers rationalize

captivity. Others try to minimize or mitigate it. Few, if any,

celebrate captivity for its own sake.

One point that zookeepers have gotten right, contrary to

Jensen's assertion that captivity is a step toward killing, is

celebrating living animals. The London Zoo and other modern zoos

originated at the same time as taxidermy came into vogue. From

Victorian times until the mid-20th century debut of the major U.S.

museums of natural history, zoos competed for market share with vast

arrays of elaborately mounted stuffed specimens.

That competition tilted decisively in favor of zoos when zoos

began learning how to keep animals who looked happier and livelier

than their dead counterparts.

Thought to Exist In The Wild relies heavily on Karen

Tweedy-Holmes' black-and-white photos to support Jensen's contention

that zoos are still mostly bleak, unhappy places for the animals.

Certainly some zoos are--but the best zoos would scarcely be as

successful as they are, well beyond the attendance levels of the

pre-television era even adjusting for human population increases, if

a bleak and unhappy atmosphere prevailed.

The visiting public can no longer be credibly accused of

simply not noticing animal suffering when thousands of zoo-goers have

registered complaints about stereotypically pacing polar bears and

swaying elephants. Zoo-goers are perceiving zoos' shortcomings, and

challenging management to respond as never before, even if the last

elephants in a zoo must be sent to distant sanctuaries where few

people will ever see them in person.

Much of Jensen's critique is outdated, including discussion

of zoos selling animals to hunting ranches. Prohibited by the

American Zoo Association since 1991, this has subsequently occurred

in only a handful of documented cases, mostly involving prosecuted

criminality by individual zoo staff.

Some of Jensen's claims are just plain wrong, such as the

assertion that there are 10,000 roadside zoos in the U.S.--about five

times more than ever existed, and about 10 times more than remain,

even counting former roadside zoos now passing as sanctuaries.

Zoos, however, are not really Jensen's target. Thought to

Exist In The Wild is actually less about zoos than a tirade against

civilization itself, stuffed with claims that tribal cultures are

more respectful of life and nature, and less inclined to consume

their own environments.

Jensen and Tweedy-Holmes might take their next photo safari

not to the safety of a zoo, but rather to the Congo, where the

young men of tribal cultures hell-bent on eradicating each other

raped 27,000 women in South Kivu Province in 2006 alone, according

to the United Nations, often doing the victims irreparable physical

injury. These same warring factions have exterminated much of the

wildlife of the region for bushmeat.

" There used to be a lot of gorillas, " Congolese

gynecological surgeon Denis Mukwege recently told Jeffrey Gettlemen

of The New York Times. " Now they have been replaced by much more

savage beasts. "

Gorillas may soon survive only in zoos, unfortunately,

because civilization has been unable to secure their habitat. But

the establishment of civilization, somehow, remains the only hope

for the victims of the tribal conflict.

--Merritt Clifton

 

 

 

--

Merritt Clifton

Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE

P.O. Box 960

Clinton, WA 98236

 

Telephone: 360-579-2505

Fax: 360-579-2575

E-mail: anmlpepl

Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

 

[ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing

original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide,

founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the

decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations.

We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year;

for free sample, send address.]