Guest guest Posted December 8, 2007 Report Share Posted December 8, 2007 Merritt, great live account of the movie " The Birds " which is an interesting film in so many ways, but you miss my point completely. Whether movie legend says many or it was one " highly trained mynah " this is one too many, inmo. I only have to look out my front window to see the root of the pet bird trade in Nepal and India. Not only is the keeping of wild birds as pets unethical but the source of the trade illegal (see Indian Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 for one example). Wild animals should not be trained as pets or movie props: this was my inspiration on reporting about Alexander the Tiger (fate now unknown) in the first place. Please do whatever you can in America to make the public see the light, especially in the areas of parrots and other " exotic " bird breeds sold in thousands of pet stores across that land. The back-end of that business is disgusting and unethical if not illegal. The front-end is not pretty either, with mynah birds and other breeds caged in urban apartments by owners who often don't have a clue on how to care for it, with the enslaved avian there to impress their master with rare intelligence or natural beauty. The situation of Americans owning wild animals as pets is truly something out of a Sci-Fi movie ala Planet of the Apes, but more important is the horrible industry this practice fuels. thanks, Jigs, AN >I found out how the film was made while in high-school, and how >Tippi Hedren was told mechanical birds would be used for the wild >bird attack >scenes, but instead, live birds were hurled at her by stage crews >for weeks during the shooting. She even suffered a bird bite and >almost lost her eye, and was later haunted by nightmares filled with >flapping birds. As it happens, I was an extra in The Birds, along with my younger brother Ted. Much of the filming was done at Potter School in Bodega, three miles inland from Bodega Bay, where my father was principal. Classes had already been temporarily moved to the fire hall just down the hill, as the school was to be closed at the end of the term. It was later operated as a bed-and-breakfast, and now is a museum. The meeting hall that formed the top floor of the schoolhouse was converted into the interior of the house where the bird attacks were supposed to have occurred. The exterior shell of the house was set up on the baseball diamond beside Potter School. The running scenes were filmed at Bodega Bay, three miles away. The film was edited so as to move Potter School from Bodega to the location of the much less picturesque grange hall in Bodega Bay. Although I was actually in only the classroom and running scenes, I was on the set for the filming of almost every scene in The Birds involving bird attacks--which, far from taking " weeks, " was accomplished in just four days of actual shooting time. (The set-up took much longer.) The only part I missed was one indoor scene, where no male extras were used, and therefore we were not asked to be on call. That was done on the fifth afternoon, & quite a few other local people were there to watch. The only live birds used by deliberate intent were several very highly trained mynahs, who were quite carefully handled at all times. Alfred Hitchcock was extremely strict about what was done with them. Presumably there was an American Humane Association set rep present, but even if there wasn't, neither Hitchcock nor Suzanne Pleshette would have put up with any animal abuse. Hitchcock was very pro-animal anyway, liked to have the young extras following him around, and took many opportunities to explain things, including his intention of improving human treatment of birds. He asked if any of us had BB guns (none did), and vigorously denounced boys who shot birds with BB guns for fun. He also drew little cartoons of himself for all of us. I still have mine. Pleshette was a natural teacher, off set as well as on, and spent a lot of time with the extras just because she liked children. She had an authoritative presence, but in a quite warm & gentle way. Tipi Hedren was a constantly frightened nervous wreck--and the least visibly interested in animals, at the time, of anyone involved, other than Rod Taylor, who was terribly ill and spent most of the time when. I don't doubt that some of the crew might have played mean tricks on her, as she was not well-liked, but Hitchcock and Pleshette were looking out for her, though Hitchcock also scolded her at times, more harshly than he ever scolded anyone else. Once she stuck her hand in a bird cage, was nipped by one of the normally quite well-behaved mynahs, and Hitchcock went ballistic. Most of the birds used were: a) Mechanical crows, dozens of them, that clipped to a person's clothing or hair like a bow tie. b) Papier mache birds -- by the hundreds. The crew left some behind. My father gathered some of them up for souvenirs, and still has them. c) Masonite silhouettes. There were hundreds of these, too. They were still visible, nailed to fences and rooftops, until many years later. They disappeared, I believe, during the hippie influx into the region of 1968-1973. d) Wild volunteers. Birds frequently visited Potter School anyway, including gulls from Bodega Bay and all sorts of birds who fed along the banks of nearby Salmon Creek, but the bogus birds had the effect of decoys, bringing thousands of additional wild birds into the vicinity to see what was going on. At that point, I had attended Potter School for three years, but had never before seen so many wild birds, there or anywhere. Hitchcock kept interrupting his own staged scenes to make sure the wild birds were captured on camera. Rachel Carson had not yet published Silent Spring in book form, but excerpts had appeared in The New Yorker, and it was from Hitchcock that I first heard about the effects of pesticides on birds. He stood there on the steps of Potter school between shots one afternoon & pointed out the absence of raptors amid all the wild birds -- who would have been feasting, if they had not all been killed by food chain accumulations of pesticides. As my mother d to The New Yorker, and saved all her back copies, I eventually found and read the Silent Spring excerpts, but I believe this was a year or two later, after the book came out. -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2007 Report Share Posted December 8, 2007 >Please do whatever you can in America to make the public see the >light, especially in the areas of parrots and other " exotic " bird >breeds sold in thousands of pet stores across that land. The Wild-Caught Bird Protection Act of 1993 ended legal commerce in wild-caught birds for the U.S. pet trade. Bird-keeping proportionate to the totality of pet-keeping is much smaller in the U.S. than in most of the rest of the world. The most recent American Pet Product Manufacturers Association data shows that Americans keep 88.3 million cats; 74.8 million dogs; 142 million freshwater fish; 24.3 million small mammals such as rabbits, rats, mice, hamsters, ferrets and guinea pigs; 16 million birds; 13.8 million horses; 13.4 million reptiles; and 9.6 million saltwater fish. The 16 million birds include poultry raised for purposes other than slaughter. The total U.S. population of exotic birds kept as pets is probably lower than the numbers kept in many of the largest Asian cities. -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2007 Report Share Posted December 10, 2007 Merrit I am baffled by the numbers u keep posting. Does this mean to say it's ok? Can ur publication do more then that? Does bird-keeping proportionality make it all go away? Do you really trust the American Pet Product Manufactures Association for anything, let alone statistics? If 16 million birds (half the human population of Nepal) are " poultry " but are not raised for slaughter, what the hell do u guys do with them all? [This stat sounds like spokes-hole cow-shit to me.] Does the 88.3 million cats include tigers and lions? Where does the APPMA get these numbers, are they pulled from their proverbial marketing hat? There is no way they can confirm these numbers, just as the US Census Bureau undercounts/overcounts at least by 5% (conservative estimate) and its not like there is a national door to door count of pets in the US with a 6 billion USD budget just for that census. So what your figures tell me is that the pet industry says there are 205.3 million wild creatures in captivity and 176.9 million domesticated animals at risk - which rivals the human population of Miami Florida. Scary. jigs > Merritt Clifton <anmlpepl > Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:37:04 -0800 > <aapn > > Re:The Birds > >> Please do whatever you can in America to make the public see the >> light, especially in the areas of parrots and other " exotic " bird >> breeds sold in thousands of pet stores across that land. > > > The Wild-Caught Bird Protection Act of 1993 ended legal > commerce in wild-caught birds for the U.S. pet trade. > > Bird-keeping proportionate to the totality of pet-keeping is > much smaller in the U.S. than in most of the rest of the world. > > The most recent American Pet Product Manufacturers > Association data shows that Americans keep 88.3 million cats; 74.8 > million dogs; 142 million freshwater fish; 24.3 million small > mammals such as rabbits, rats, mice, hamsters, ferrets and guinea > pigs; 16 million birds; 13.8 million horses; 13.4 million > reptiles; and 9.6 million saltwater fish. > > The 16 million birds include poultry raised for purposes > other than slaughter. The total U.S. population of exotic birds kept > as pets is probably lower than the numbers kept in many of the > largest Asian cities. > > > > -- > Merritt Clifton > Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE > P.O. Box 960 > Clinton, WA 98236 > > Telephone: 360-579-2505 > Fax: 360-579-2575 > E-mail: anmlpepl > Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org > > [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing > original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, > founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the > decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. > We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; > for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.