Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Leakey backing for elephant cull

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

What does anyone here make of this?

*

* * Leakey backing for elephant cull*

By Richard Black

Environment correspondent, BBC News website

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7301195.stm

 

*The eminent conservationist Richard Leakey has given qualified backing for

South Africa's plan to cull elephants.*

 

In an article for the BBC News website, the former head of the Kenyan

Wildlife Service says culling is " a necessary part of population

management " .

 

But Dr Leakey says there is also a responsibility to curb human activities

that impinge on elephant habitat.

 

South Africa plans to allow culling after a gap of 14 years because of

growing numbers of elephants.

 

The population is estimated to have expanded from 8,000 to 18,000 in little

more than a decade.

 

The plan has aroused the ire of some environment and animal welfare groups.

 

Some are so opposed to the plan that they have called for tourist boycotts.

 

*Necessary evil*

 

Having made his name as a palaeontologist studying the origins of humanity

in Africa, the 1980s saw Dr Leakey at the forefront of the movement

campaigning for the suspension of elephant culling.

 

But now he sees it as necessary.

 

" While I will never 'like' the idea of elephant culling, I do accept that

given the impacts of human-induced climate change and habitat destruction,

elephants inside and outside of protected areas will become an increasingly

serious problem unless key populations are reduced and maintained at

appropriate levels, " he writes in an article for the BBC's Green Room

series.

 

" Though I find elephant culling repugnant, I can see the sense in it [in

some scenarios]. "

 

The resumption of culling was announced last month by environment minister

Marthinus van Schalkwyk as part of a package of measures for controlling

elephant numbers.

 

In some parts of the country, people have complained that the animals are

dangerous, and that they eat crops and drink water intended for the human

population.

 

The South African plan lists culling as a last resort, with measures such as

better management of elephant enclosures, translocation, and contraception

examined first.

 

*Social impacts*

 

Richard Leakey says the priority given to animal welfare in the South

African plan is a major reason for his change of stance.

 

" I was pleasantly surprised to find that the guiding principles... begin

with the acknowledgement that 'elephants are intelligent, have strong family

bonds and operate within highly socialised groups', " he writes.

 

In contrast, he says the previous culling programme which his campaigning

helped to end in 1994 appeared to be largely commercially motivated, was not

managed in a scientific manner and was unacceptably inhumane " .

 

Dr Leakey, whose most recent work includes founding the conservation group

WildlifeDirect, believes it is essential to recognise that conflicts between

elephants and human communities can and should be addressed by looking at

the human end of the problem as well.

 

With human activities encroaching ever further into traditional wildlife

habitat, competition for land, food and water is increasing.

 

" I believe that we have a responsibility to check habitat impacts in order

to reduce conflicts between elephants and humans by controlling human

activities as well, " he writes.

 

The South African management plan sees culling becoming an option from 1

May.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> What does anyone here make of this?

> *

> * * Leakey backing for elephant cull*

> By Richard Black

> Environment correspondent, BBC News website

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7301195.stm

>

> *The eminent conservationist Richard Leakey has given qualified backing for

> South Africa's plan to cull elephants.*

 

BBC may still tag him as 'eminent conservationist'. But the fact is,

by supporting the cull he is encouraging MURDER.

 

Azam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Azam,

 

I think we might want to discuss here first what alternatives there are to the

culling of the elephants.

 

Am a bit lost why this African issue is on the AAPN...

 

Edwin Wiek

WFFT Thailand / Laos

 

Moderator's note:

I allowed the post through because this list has a strong interest in elephants

and what is happening today in Africa may happen tomorrow in Asia. I believe it

is good that we should debate the issue here sooner rather than later.

John, Moderator, AAPN.

 

_____

 

aapn [aapn ] On Behalf Of AZAM

SIDDIQUI

Wednesday, 19 March, 2008 1:13 AM

Seelan Palay

Cc: aapn

Re: Leakey backing for elephant cull

 

 

 

> What does anyone here make of this?

> *

> * * Leakey backing for elephant cull*

> By Richard Black

> Environment correspondent, BBC News website

> http://news. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7301195.stm>

bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7301195.stm

>

> *The eminent conservationist Richard Leakey has given qualified backing

for

> South Africa's plan to cull elephants.*

 

BBC may still tag him as 'eminent conservationist'. But the fact is,

by supporting the cull he is encouraging MURDER.

 

Azam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Edwin,

Edwin there is a VALID link to the subject 'CULLING of Elephants'. Whether

African or Asian is something that should not be permitted to count.

 

We are here to learn from the mistakes of others, and please remember that if

the culling of elephants in the African continent is something that is not

condemned, debated, and criticized by Asian animal people or to be more

precise 'PEOPLE OF ASIAN ORIGIN WORKING FOR ASIAN ANIMALS' then very soon

the African example is going to find place in some wretched Nation in South

East Asia or to begin with India.

 

Also if the legendary elephant expert Dame Daphne Sheldrick based in the

African continent can voice for the 'Asian Elephants' and has openly

condemned the 'CULLING' then why not us?

 

Can you help me out with how many news media organisations have approached

Dame Daphne for a quote on culling. Perhaps none, because the lobby that is

pro culling has its roots stretched far....so far that I may not be

surprised if people working for Asian elephant conservation tomorrow come

out and defend the 'Culling of Africa' and demand something similar back

here.

 

And as far as alternatives to culling are concerned, I am pasting you the

reaction of Dame Daphne which itself is self explanatory.

 

Regards,

 

Azam

 

Dame Daphne`s reactions received last year 2007:

 

Dear Azam,

 

Thank you for your Email of 27th February. The international public,

who now understand the nature of elephants, and the fact that they are

very human in emotion, age progression and longevity are unanimously

against the brutal culling, which leaves elephant society in tatters.

 

Elephants have a superior memory to humans (scientifically proven

through a study of the brain by Dr. Gay Bradshaw), and if it is

unacceptable for humans to cull their own over-population for obvious

reasons, then it should never be countenanced for elephants.

 

There are other means of dealing with an over population in small

Protected Areas, i.e. contraception, moving family units (which has

been done successfully in Kenya) or allowing Nature to enact its

own way of culling, whereby sub adult females throughout the entire

population are targeted during times of privation, and die quietly,

peacefully and en masse near permanent water (the myth of the

elephants'Graveyard).

 

By removing sub-adult females from an elephant population, gaps are

created in breeding, putting the population into decline until times

are better.

 

The brutal culling of elephants by humans is usually financially

driven by greed and corruption.

Nature does a better job of it by targeting the females, the sick and

the maimed, so that a healthier and stronger population emerges

through natural selection, which is Nature's most powerful tool.

 

South Africa is a pariah when it comes to Animal Welfare, and the

corruption, greed, and mal-practices there are well documented and

well known, examples being the Tuli Debacle, the infamous Canned Lion

Hunting, the Sport Hunting of endangered species taken from Protected

Areas and offered up to Hunters in exchange for money, etc., etc.

 

Theirs is no example for India to follow, for India is seen as always

having had a far more humane and compassionate approach to wild

animals, animals generally, and especially elephants. Evil practices

like culling for financial gain should never be allowed, and only

public and international pressure can be used to dissuade those in

power against it.

 

Best wishes.

 

Dr. Dame Daphne Sheldrick.

 

 

 

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Edwin Wiek <edwin_wiek wrote:

 

> Hi Azam,

>

> I think we might want to discuss here first what alternatives there are to

> the culling of the elephants.

>

> Am a bit lost why this African issue is on the AAPN...

>

> Edwin Wiek

> WFFT Thailand / Laos

> ------------------------------

> ** aapn [aapn ] *On Behalf Of

> *AZAM SIDDIQUI

> *Sent:* Wednesday, 19 March, 2008 1:13 AM

> *To:* Seelan Palay

> *Cc:* aapn

> *Subject:* Re: Leakey backing for elephant cull

>

> > What does anyone here make of this?

> > *

> > * * Leakey backing for elephant cull*

> > By Richard Black

> > Environment correspondent, BBC News website

> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7301195.stm

> >

> > *The eminent conservationist Richard Leakey has given qualified backing

> for

> > South Africa's plan to cull elephants.*

>

> BBC may still tag him as 'eminent conservationist'. But the fact is,

> by supporting the cull he is encouraging MURDER.

>

> Azam

>

>

> __________ NOD32 2956 (20080318) Information __________

>

> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.

> http://www.eset.com

>

 

 

 

--

United against elephant polo

http://www.stopelephantpolo.com

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Reactions of Ms Belinda Wright, Executive Director, WPSI ( Wildlife

Protection Society of India ) on Leaky`s views backing the elephant cull.

Posted on AAPN after permission from Ms. Wright :

 

_____________

 

 

Dear Azam,

 

The problems in Africa are very different from India and I'm afraid I do not

know enough about the situation in Africa to respond. I am a great admirer

of Dr Leakey, and in particular his remarkable fight to *end *elephant

culling in South Africa in the 1980's. At present there is certainly no

example here in India where the situation cannot be managed and the evils

and tragedy of culling should even be considered.

 

With best wishes, Belinda

 

 

 

--

United against elephant polo

http://www.stopelephantpolo.com

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...