Guest guest Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 >They have threfore decided to conduct a trial to research on the >effectiveness of ABC programme. They have approached us to do the needful. Doing an accurate dog count is quite easy, & counting sterilized vs. unsterilized dogs is also quite easy, if the sterilized dogs have been identified in a readily visible manner, such as ear-tagging or ear-notching. As I previously posted to AAPN on August 8, 2007: The dog population or any city, or population of monkeys, pigs, cattle, or lazy bureaucrats, is best estimated by doing line transects, and is done most rapidly if one can mobilize many volunteers. This does not require a lot of training, just careful observation and accurately recording basic numbers on a clipboard: males, females, puppies, ear-notched for sterilized or not. A student group or school class could do the necessary line transects as a math or science project. The methodology is for people to walk completely across the city from outskirt to outskirt, by several different routes, counting dogs (or whatever) & then multiplying the number of dogs seen by the total area of the city. I recently did line transects of a suburb of Ahmedabad, India, that were found to have 90% accuracy when the Animal Help Foundation followed up my work with a much longer and more intensive door-to-door count. (Where I counted 67 dogs in two hours, a two-day effort led by Rahul Seghal found 74.) Line transects can also be done from a car, but the car would have to move very slowly, with multiple observers, in order to see every dog. Walking produces far more accurate information. If you do a line transect well, your count will detect most of the dogs on the side streets as well as the main streets, and you may also detect some dogs who are behind doors or walls, when they bark as you pass. Counting feral cats is somewhat more difficult, because of the furtive habits of feral cats. In order to do a good cat count, it is necessary to walk at dawn or dusk, and may be necessary to climb to the highest rooftop on each block to see how many cats may be seen on other rooftops. Fortunately, it is not necessary to see cats in order to count them. Scat counts can also be highly reliable, figuring about one cat per identifiable scat (because scats don't last long in outdoor environments, and the number one will not find will approximately equal to the number of duplicates one will find that were produced by a single bold cat.) -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.