Guest guest Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 2008: Raising funds in hard times Raising money during crises is an area that I have had a particular interest in since college-not just the impact of the economy on donations, but also the effects of war, natural disasters, terrorism and even positive " good feeling " events such as, for example, the 1969 first human landing on the moon. Today animal charities are asking, " What impact will the recession in the United States have on donations? " There is a prevailing fear that the effects will be considerable. However, this fear is not well grounded. While recessions have a definite impact, historically charitable giving, overall, has not declined during recessions. Different sectors of donors and potential donors react differently, and different types of charities are affected differently. For example, literally nothing dampens giving to religious causes. Planned gifts are largely unaffected by such events, regardless of the type of charity the gifts are directed toward, because decisions to make such gifts are usually made long before a crisis occurs. Foundation support has actually quite dramatically increased during poor economic times. Corporate giving tends to even out, because giving is tied to profitability, but is usually not cut back. Small donors do hold back-but can be effectively persuaded with the argument that " the animals need our help just as much, perhaps even more, in difficult times as in good times. " New small donors are more difficult to acquire but this does not mean one should not continue prospecting to counterbalance natural file attrition-it simply means that one should be more vigilant about costs, by mailing reduced quantities, testing less, or simplifying packages. Large donors, usually the very wealthy, are not significantly affected. Changes in tax laws have a far, far greater impact on these donors. More than 80% of all charitable giving in the US is by individuals. Following on this fact, let me quote from one of the more recent studies: " Since 1968 and measured in constant dollars, giving has declined in some recession years but increased in others. The biggest declines tracked the 1973-75 recession, but giving actually rose in the 1980-82 recession and in the first year of the 1969-70 recession. Further, individual giving has increased every year in real terms, irrespective of economic times, except in 1987 when dampened by a combination of a stock market collapse and tax changes. " The bottom line is we should not be oblivious to the current economic situation but we should not be overly concerned either. We should just plan accordingly and understand the historical realities. The concerns many people have, including me, are real, at least in terms of personal finance. But frankly, and this has often caused me to ponder, many non-profits seem to spend more time dwelling on " reasons " why they don't think they can raise money than fashioning ways to overcome the perceived obstacles to raising money: " Everyone's giving to the Hurricane Katrina Fund...everyone's giving to help tsunami survivors...all the money is being sucked up by the presidential candidates...the event won't work because so and so is holding their event that week too...people won't give right now because they are worried about the war in Iraq, paying their mortgage and the rising costs of food and gasoline... " The main reason people don't give is because they aren't asked to give. --Paul Seigel Direct Mail Systems 12450 Autombile Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33762 <pauls <www.dmsmails.com/> Why fundraising mailings often include merchandise I like what Humane Society of the U.S. president Wayne Pacelle writes, but now HSUS is doing something I consider dreadful: sending gifts and expecting money back. This just came yesterday: Two 2008 " Members Only " his and hers watches for support of their 2008 Anti-Cruelty campaign. Suggested blanks: $150, $225, $300 and Other. I feel like checking " other " for two cents and telling them how unappealing this kind of appeal is. I do UNICEF fundraising at Hallo-ween. When UNICEF began mailing nickels in appeals, I complained to a friend working there, and she said that oddly enough these are among their most successful types of appeal. So I could be all wrong, but I feel like writing to Wayne Pacelle and telling him I'm going to deduct money from my annual contribution. They have a good message without these black digital watches. --Ruth Heller San Rafael, California Editor's note: The new U.S. Postal Service rate structure introduced in May 2008 may discourage the inclusion of unwanted " gift " merchandise in appeals. Such appeals are reputedly highly profitable if the merchandise is donated or is purchased very cheaply, but are believed to bring diminishing returns as the cost of the merchandise and mailing rise. The nature of the merchandise mailed also makes a difference. Calendars remind people to donate. Calculators help them do it. T-shirts help to promote the image and name recognition value of the charity. So do coffee mugs. Some other items that have been tried as premiums don't work as well. Supplying merchandise for inclusion in appeals has several times been involved in alleged kickback schemes involving charities. In view that mailing merchandise tends to raise donors' suspicion that their money is being misused, charities would do well to clearly identify the cost of the items they send, and the cost/income ratios they obtained on similar mailings in the past. Many fundraisers regard such information as a trade secret, but in view of the potential for abuse of donor trust inherent in fundraising for charity, this is a field where the only legitimate trade secret should be the names and addresses of individual donors who wish for their privacy to be respected. -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.