Guest guest Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 A better way to kill or atleast to make all of the tigers prone to various genetic diseases couldn't have been found! I wonder, why on earth didn't the Scientists and experts carry out the DNA tests BEFORE airlifting the animals in haste!!!!!!!! Now are they going to be again re-located to Ranthambore or would they be left to their fate there at Sariska? To be poached or die of some genetic disease…whichever is earlier..right? Or even if they did survive….the mortality rate within-litter would be…??? Species survival is critically dependent on reproductive performance which in turn seems to correlate with genetic heterozygosity. I guess it wouldn't be long when the entire species is wiped out if such hasty measures are put into action without realizing the dire consequences! Talk about Sibling revelry..eh? Warm Regards Radhika Singh http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6612174.ece From The Times July 1, 2009 Bengal tiger breeding plan at Sariska in doubt over fears that new mates are siblings Jeremy Page in Delhi When Indian wildlife authorities took three Bengal tigers by helicopter to an empty reserve in Rajasthan last year it was hailed as a groundbreaking experiment to revive the country's flagging tiger population. Now, some experts fear that the male and two females relocated to the Sariska reserve could all be siblings — reducing their chances of a successful long-term breeding programme. The Wildlife Institute of India (WII), which is in charge of the project, began testing DNA samples from the three tigers yesterday to decide if they need to introduce others from different parts of the country. It already had blood samples from the two females but had not taken a sample from the male until it was briefly captured on Monday to have its broken radio collar replaced. " We're to blame — we should have done this earlier but everything was done in a hurry, " K. Sankar, a WII tiger expert who is overseeing the project, told The Times. " Now we have the samples, the analysis is under way and after that we will be able to say for sure. We're keeping our fingers crossed. " Results are expected this weekend, when the Indian Environment Minister is due to visit Sariska. If the tigers are proven to be siblings it would be the latest in a series of embarrassments for Indian wildlife officials, who were forced to admit in 2005 that all of Sariska's tigers had been killed. Sariska used to be India's most famous tiger sanctuary and was at the centre of the Project Tiger conservation programme launched by Indira Gandhi, the late Prime Minister, in 1973. But the programme has failed to prevent India's tiger population plummeting to 1,411 as of February last year — down from 3,642 in 2002 — largely as a result of poaching. Last year's relocation, the first of its kind, was part of a £93 million emergency plan to revive the tiger population, which was estimated at 40,000 a century ago. Dr Sankar said that Wildlife Institute experts knew the females were likely to be sisters, or half-sisters, because they were relocated from the same area of the Ranthambore reserve, also in Rajasthan. The male was selected from a different part of Ranthambore and there was no evidence that the females were his siblings, he said. However, critics say that the institute should have carried out DNA tests to confirm its analysis before airlifting the tigers to Sariska. " It's a very simple procedure, " said Dharmendra Khandal, a field biologist based in Ranthambore. He said that the WII's census data showed that one adult male occupied the entire territory where the three relocated tigers were born. Inbreeding is common in the wild — even between a male and daughter. But it could create problems by perpetuating genetic weaknesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 Stud Books of endangered species especially at Zoos must be maintained and a proper breeding plan be made. In most of Zoos and Parks there are genetic abnormalities due to inbreeding of animals. Lions at Chatt Bir Zoo Near Chandigarh(in Punjab) suffered a lot as the young cubs started developing deformities and abnormalities.as a result all males have been castrated. The Zoo which has 100 + lions in 98 is having about 10 old animals. They are now planning to get a pair to start breeding a fresh or bringing exotic (African Lions). Dr.Sandeep K.Jain Member Punjab State Board for Wildlife --- On Wed, 1/7/09, Radhika Singh <princess_rads10 wrote: Radhika Singh <princess_rads10 (IN) Tiger breeding program at Sariska in doldrums! aapn Wednesday, 1 July, 2009, 9:34 PM A better way to kill or atleast to make all of the tigers prone to various genetic diseases couldn't have been found! I wonder, why on earth didn't the Scientists and experts carry out the DNA tests BEFORE airlifting the animals in haste!!!!!!! ! Now are they going to be again re-located to Ranthambore or would they be left to their fate there at Sariska? To be poached or die of some genetic disease…whichever is earlier..right? Or even if they did survive….the mortality rate within-litter would be…??? Species survival is critically dependent on reproductive performance which in turn seems to correlate with genetic heterozygosity. I guess it wouldn't be long when the entire species is wiped out if such hasty measures are put into action without realizing the dire consequences! Talk about Sibling revelry..eh? Warm Regards Radhika Singh http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ world/asia/ article6612174. ece From The Times July 1, 2009 Bengal tiger breeding plan at Sariska in doubt over fears that new mates are siblings Jeremy Page in Delhi When Indian wildlife authorities took three Bengal tigers by helicopter to an empty reserve in Rajasthan last year it was hailed as a groundbreaking experiment to revive the country's flagging tiger population. Now, some experts fear that the male and two females relocated to the Sariska reserve could all be siblings — reducing their chances of a successful long-term breeding programme. The Wildlife Institute of India (WII), which is in charge of the project, began testing DNA samples from the three tigers yesterday to decide if they need to introduce others from different parts of the country. It already had blood samples from the two females but had not taken a sample from the male until it was briefly captured on Monday to have its broken radio collar replaced. " We're to blame — we should have done this earlier but everything was done in a hurry, " K. Sankar, a WII tiger expert who is overseeing the project, told The Times. " Now we have the samples, the analysis is under way and after that we will be able to say for sure. We're keeping our fingers crossed. " Results are expected this weekend, when the Indian Environment Minister is due to visit Sariska. If the tigers are proven to be siblings it would be the latest in a series of embarrassments for Indian wildlife officials, who were forced to admit in 2005 that all of Sariska's tigers had been killed. Sariska used to be India's most famous tiger sanctuary and was at the centre of the Project Tiger conservation programme launched by Indira Gandhi, the late Prime Minister, in 1973. But the programme has failed to prevent India's tiger population plummeting to 1,411 as of February last year — down from 3,642 in 2002 — largely as a result of poaching. Last year's relocation, the first of its kind, was part of a £93 million emergency plan to revive the tiger population, which was estimated at 40,000 a century ago. Dr Sankar said that Wildlife Institute experts knew the females were likely to be sisters, or half-sisters, because they were relocated from the same area of the Ranthambore reserve, also in Rajasthan. The male was selected from a different part of Ranthambore and there was no evidence that the females were his siblings, he said. However, critics say that the institute should have carried out DNA tests to confirm its analysis before airlifting the tigers to Sariska. " It's a very simple procedure, " said Dharmendra Khandal, a field biologist based in Ranthambore. He said that the WII's census data showed that one adult male occupied the entire territory where the three relocated tigers were born. Inbreeding is common in the wild — even between a male and daughter. But it could create problems by perpetuating genetic weaknesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.