Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Well, there you have the prejudice in a nutshell I suppose. When I first saw ur post headline, I was thinking that a judge was actually applying anti-terror laws to animals, but I see now it¹s just a metaphor. I guess it goes back to human religious beliefs that animals are of a lower order, instead of equals (or better). That¹s a tough fight I suppose, until there is a pagan jihad someday. Well, I got my German Sheppard holstered with a Luger and we have just about gotten the kinks outta the Rhino RGB...only a matter of time now. Jigs in Nepal On 2/26/09 10:55 AM, " AZAM SIDDIQUI " <azam24x7 wrote: > > > > Just the other day my friend Jigme Gaton was wondering over how insensitive > a section of Indian Journalists are when it comes to covering issues > involving animals. > Below you can find the interpretation of 'animal' by a senior Judge of the > Hon'ble Supreme Court of India where he compares a 'Terrorist' with an > 'Animal'. > > Any suggestions as to should be tolerate such language and ignore the abuse, > if not what best should we be doing? > > Azam > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Terrorists_are_animals_SC_judge_/arti > cleshow/4038562.cms > > Terrorists are 'animals': SC judge > 27 Jan 2009, 2130 hrs IST, PTI > > NEW DELHI: A senior judge of the Supreme Court on Tuesday likened terrorists > killing innocent people to " animals " and said they cannot be allowed to take > benefit of human rights. > > " Those who violate the rights of society and have no respect for human > rights cannot be a human, " Justice Arijit Pasayat said at a seminar on > terrorism here. > > " We should not talk about human rights violation of terrorists because > terrorists are the people who kill innocent people with AK-47 and AK-56, " he > said, adding that " those who killed innocent people by no stretch of > imagination are human beings. They are worth not more than animals. " > > Pasayat stressed the need for effective implementation of the new terror law > and said that " investigators and prosecutors should be trained properly in > this regard " . > > He said cases relating to terror attacks should be taken on priority basis > as " it is the object of the Act " . > > Solicitor General G E Vahanvati while referring to the November 26 terror > attacks in Mumbai said as a lawyer it would have been difficult for him to > defend lone surviving terrorist Amir Ajmal Kasab. > > " If I would have been asked to defend Kasab, probably I would have refused, " > Vahanvati, who hails from Mumbai, said. > > The solicitor general said he could not defend a person against his > conviction. > > " If I go and defend a person against my conviction it would be unfair, " he > said. -- Paul Reitman, CEO Phoenix Studios Nepal Mobile: 9841589797 www.phoenixstudios.com.np/corporate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 If we could all write very polite letters to him pointing out his wrong usage of the language, it would help. Letters should be addressed to: The Hon'ble Justice Arijit Pasayat Supreme Court of India New Delhi 110001 Thanks and regards S. Chinny Krishna > Just the other day my friend Jigme Gaton was wondering over how > insensitive > a section of Indian Journalists are when it comes to covering issues > involving animals. > Below you can find the interpretation of 'animal' by a senior Judge of the > Hon'ble Supreme Court of India where he compares a 'Terrorist' with an > 'Animal'. > > Any suggestions as to should be tolerate such language and ignore the > abuse, > if not what best should we be doing? > > Azam > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Terrorists_are_animals_SC_judge_/articl\ eshow/4038562.cms > > Terrorists are 'animals': SC judge > 27 Jan 2009, 2130 hrs IST, PTI > > > NEW DELHI: A senior judge of the Supreme Court on Tuesday likened > terrorists > killing innocent people to " animals " and said they cannot be allowed to > take > benefit of human rights. > > " Those who violate the rights of society and have no respect for human > rights cannot be a human, " Justice Arijit Pasayat said at a seminar on > terrorism here. > > " We should not talk about human rights violation of terrorists because > terrorists are the people who kill innocent people with AK-47 and AK-56, " > he > said, adding that " those who killed innocent people by no stretch of > imagination are human beings. They are worth not more than animals. " > > Pasayat stressed the need for effective implementation of the new terror > law > and said that " investigators and prosecutors should be trained properly in > this regard " . > > He said cases relating to terror attacks should be taken on priority basis > as " it is the object of the Act " . > > Solicitor General G E Vahanvati while referring to the November 26 terror > attacks in Mumbai said as a lawyer it would have been difficult for him to > defend lone surviving terrorist Amir Ajmal Kasab. > > " If I would have been asked to defend Kasab, probably I would have > refused, " > Vahanvati, who hails from Mumbai, said. > > The solicitor general said he could not defend a person against his > conviction. > > " If I go and defend a person against my conviction it would be unfair, " he > said. > > > > -- > http://www.stopelephantpolo.com > http://www.freewebs.com/azamsiddiqui > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 Hello, I have written to the judge. I mentioned he was perfectly correct in his assertion that 'terrorists' are animals. I also added that animals have rights. I also made it cogent that he himself is also an animal, and so am I and so is every human being on Planet Earth. I don't know what he will think of it, but I spoke the truth. It is an important mission in my life to make people realise that human beings ARE animals because that is what evolution teaches us. The word animal is derived from the Latin word 'anima' meaning soul, so whoever has a soul is an animal and that includes this judge. There is nothing offensive about it. Now I think will get another spate of emails and telephone calls threatening me for this! Regards, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:45 PM, <drkrishna wrote: > If we could all write very polite letters to him pointing out his wrong > usage of the language, it would help. > > Letters should be addressed to: > > The Hon'ble Justice Arijit Pasayat > Supreme Court of India > New Delhi 110001 > > Thanks and regards > > S. Chinny Krishna > > > > Just the other day my friend Jigme Gaton was wondering over how > > insensitive > > a section of Indian Journalists are when it comes to covering issues > > involving animals. > > Below you can find the interpretation of 'animal' by a senior Judge of > the > > Hon'ble Supreme Court of India where he compares a 'Terrorist' with an > > 'Animal'. > > > > Any suggestions as to should be tolerate such language and ignore the > > abuse, > > if not what best should we be doing? > > > > Azam > > > > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Terrorists_are_animals_SC_judge_/articl\ eshow/4038562.cms > > > > Terrorists are 'animals': SC judge > > 27 Jan 2009, 2130 hrs IST, PTI > > > > > > NEW DELHI: A senior judge of the Supreme Court on Tuesday likened > > terrorists > > killing innocent people to " animals " and said they cannot be allowed to > > take > > benefit of human rights. > > > > " Those who violate the rights of society and have no respect for human > > rights cannot be a human, " Justice Arijit Pasayat said at a seminar on > > terrorism here. > > > > " We should not talk about human rights violation of terrorists because > > terrorists are the people who kill innocent people with AK-47 and AK-56, " > > he > > said, adding that " those who killed innocent people by no stretch of > > imagination are human beings. They are worth not more than animals. " > > > > Pasayat stressed the need for effective implementation of the new terror > > law > > and said that " investigators and prosecutors should be trained properly > in > > this regard " . > > > > He said cases relating to terror attacks should be taken on priority > basis > > as " it is the object of the Act " . > > > > Solicitor General G E Vahanvati while referring to the November 26 terror > > attacks in Mumbai said as a lawyer it would have been difficult for him > to > > defend lone surviving terrorist Amir Ajmal Kasab. > > > > " If I would have been asked to defend Kasab, probably I would have > > refused, " > > Vahanvati, who hails from Mumbai, said. > > > > The solicitor general said he could not defend a person against his > > conviction. > > > > " If I go and defend a person against my conviction it would be unfair, " > he > > said. > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.stopelephantpolo.com > > http://www.freewebs.com/azamsiddiqui > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 Dear All, Animals and birds are treated brutally in Orissa.The dogs who are beaten to death by the public, the cattle transported across state borders in a very cruel manner cramming them into lorries and the turtles protected by international conventions and Wildlife protection act 1972 which are cruelly killed for meat and still sold openly at rushikulya and kendrapara district. As far as our particular case is concerned: Warm Regards sanjib kumar das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.