Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 *UN Observer >> China Ivory deal- NGO's in tiger coalition are quiter ! Should the following comments made on the 'Sky News' portal be ignored as false and baseless ? Or, does it actually point to a deadly divide in conservation ethics between the 'Save the Tiger' Vs 'Rest of the Species' ? * Azam Link: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/China-Ivory-Deal-Condemned-Internati\ onal-Fund-for-Animal-Welfare-Angered/Article/200807315036764 " The move to let china be an importer was decided 1 year back. Its a trade off for the conservation of Tigers. This will put pressure on the Chinese government to shut the tiger farms. The deal was reached at the last CITES Convention in Hague.,,,I am sure many conservationists know and have approved this. The war on biodiversity is sometimes a war on ideologies. Note; the NGO's in tiger coalition are quiter !!!! " Posted By :UN observer -- United against elephant polo http://www.stopelephantpolo.com http://www.freewebs.com/azamsiddiqui Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.