Guest guest Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Merrit, I 100% agree what you have in previous emails about the origination of this flu (I can¹t even bring myself to say the ³s² word, and thereby condemn even more pigs to death). For all we know, this variant of the virus or all variants of virus for that matter - could have originated by a mixing of RNA from extraterrestrial aliens. If only ³animal activists² would take the time to learn some basic science instead of flailing about and fuelling a planetary pig genocide! It might be a good thing if all pork farms were closed down world-wide and forever perhaps - but folks that want to influence others to become vegetarians or to ³love thy pig,² should do it honestly and with good science, not horsecrap, rumour, and assumptions. And if that fails...well, that¹s a comment for another day and one made only on a secured channel. That¹s all I got to say today - I gotta get back to my examination of some Neuraminidase I found on my dog¹s fur. Cheers, Jigs in Nepal On 5/6/09 10:40 AM, " Merritt Clifton " <anmlpepl wrote: > > > > > > From ANIMAL PEOPLE, May 2009: > > Did new flu emerge from a pig farm? > > MEXICO CITY--Rumors swept the world > during the last week of April 2009 that a newly > detected H1N1 flu virus variant suspected of > killing as many as 149 Mexicans might have > evolved at a factory-style pig farm at Perote, > in Vera Cruz state on the Gulf of Mexico. As > ANIMAL PEOPLE went to press on the night of April > 28, however, little medical or veterinary > evidence supported the hypothesis that the > disease is of factory farm origin, and some > evidence seemed to refute it. > Among the first 1,995 suspected Mexican > cases of the new flu strain, only 27 were > laboratory-confirmed. Lab-confirmed human cases > had occurred in 19 other nations, including 64 > cases in the U.S., but no deaths were reported > outside of Mexico. > Bloggers and news media usually called > the virus " swine flu, " but although it contained > genetic material of swine origin, nothing linked > it to recent swine infections. > The Perote farm belongs to the Mexican > firm Granjas Carroll, a half-owned subsidiary of > Smithfield Inc., the world's largest pork > producer. Smithfield spokesperson Keira Ullrich > told media that an internal investigation had > found no clinical signs or symptoms of swine > influenza in animals and employees at any of its > Mexican facilities. A United Nations' Food & > Agriculture Organiz-ation team reportedly reached > Pecote on April 28 to seek independent > confirmation. > " We deny completely that the influenza > virus affecting Mexico originated in pigs because > it has been scientifically demonstrated that this > is not possible, " claimed the Mexican National > Organization of Pig Production and Producers. > That was an exaggeration, but at press > time the case for factory farm involvement > appeared to rest on the coincidence that the > earliest identified case of the new H1N1 virus > variant was detected in 5-year-old Edgar > Hernandez, who lives near the Granjas Carroll > pig farm. > Hernandez fell ill on April 2, Mexican > health secretary Jose Angel Cordova told media. > Many other Perote residents fell ill at about the > same time, but " Only one sample from the group, > that belonging to the boy, was preserved, " > reported Tracy Wilkinson and Cecilia Sanchez of > the Los Angeles Times. " It was retested after > other cases of the new strain were confirmed > elsewhere in the country, Cordova said. The boy > had the same disease. It is unknown how many > more of the hundreds of people who fell sick in > Perote also were infected by the strain. " > " In Perote, " Wilkinson and Sanchez > found, " residents of the hamlet known as La > Gloria have complained since mid-March that the > pig farm was tainting their water and causing > respiratory infections. In one demonstration in > early April, they carried signs with pictures of > pigs crossed out with an X and the word > 'peligro'--danger. Residents told reporters at > the time that more than half the town's 3,000 > inhabitants were sick, and that three children > under age two had died. > " Local health officials mobilized when > the outbreak was first reported, " Wilkinson and > Sanchez reported, " but they gave a different > account: The infection may have started with a > migrant farmer who returned from work in the U.S. > and gave the disease to his wife, who in turn > passed it to other women in the community. " > " La Gloria was not alone in experiencing > a fierce flu outbreak in recent weeks, " noted > Marc Lacey of The New York Times. " Public health > officials in other parts of Mexico said they had > noticed an unusual spike in cases in the > beginning of April, when the normal flu season > would usually end. " > Door-to-door census taker Maria Adela > Gutierrez, 39, of Oaxaca, capital city of > Oaxaca state, on April 13 became the first > confirmed fatality from the new H1N1 strain. > > James Wilson, MD > > Most reports associating the Perote pig > farm with the H1N1 outbreak, including two > widely distributed columns by Grist food editor > Tom Philpot, referenced a biosurveillance web > site and blog posted by James M. Wilson V, M.D., > of Seattle. > Wilson has done biosurveillance for the > U.S. armed forces, the USDA, NASA, and the > Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, > among other agencies, and is cofounder of the > Veratect Corporation, which " provides animal and > human infectious disease event detection and > tracking globally, " says his online biographical > page. > But Wilson was more cautious than many of > the people who used his material. > " One key myth I wish to dispel, " Wilson > updated on April 27, " is the claim that there > was any credible link to a pig farm. Such claims > must be verified through solid epidemiological > investigation. " > Wilson on April 24 posted a " Swine Flu in > Mexico " timeline that began with a March 30 > report that " a 47-year-old attorney was > hospitalized in a coma at Ottawa General Hospital > following a recent trip to Mexico. " > On April 27 Wilson acknowledged that this > case " tested negative according to Canadian > officials, " and that there was therefore no > reason to link it to H1N1. > On April 2, the timeline continued, > " Local media source Imagen del Golfo reported > that [Vera Cruz] state health officials recorded > a 15% increase in disease over an unspecified > period in the highland areas of Vera Cruz, which > includes La Gloria. The increase was primarily > due to higher levels of upper respiratory disease > and gastroenteritis. Specifically, officials > noted an increase in pneumonia and bronchial > pneumonia. Health officials attributed the > increase to seasonal climate changes. " > On April 6, recounted Wilson's timeline, > " Local health officials declared a health alert > due to a respiratory disease outbreak in La > Gloria. Sources characterized the event as a > 'strange' outbreak of acute respiratory > infection, which led to bronchial pneumonia in > some pediatric cases. Health officials recorded > 400 cases who sought medical treatment in La > Gloria, population 3,000; officials indicated > that 60% of the town's population had been > affected. No precise timeframe was provided, > but sources reported that a local official had > been seeking health assistance for the town since > February. Residents claimed that three pediatric > cases, all under two years of age, died from > the outbreak, " as Wilkinson and Sanchez of the > Los Angeles Times confirmed. > " However, " Wilson continued, " health > officials stated that there was no direct link > between the pediatric deaths and the outbreak; > they stated the three fatal cases were 'isolated' > and 'not related' to each other. " > > Flu or biting flies? > > Continued the April 6 timeline entry, > " Residents believed the outbreak was caused by > contamination from pig breeding farms operated by > Granjas Carroll. According to residents, the > company denied responsibility and attributed the > cases to 'flu.' " This was apparently the first > mention of flu in connection with the La Gloria > disease outbreak. > " However, " the timeline added, " a > municipal health official stated that preliminary > investigations indicated that the disease vector > was a type of fly that reproduces in pig waste, > and that the outbreak was linked to the pig > farms. It was unclear whether health officials > had identified a suspected pathogen responsible > for this outbreak. " > Many insect-borne diseases produce > flu-like symptoms, including the ricketsial and > malarial disease families--but the ricketsial > diseases are caused by bacteria, and the > malarial diseases by protozoan parasites. > On April 27, Wilson posted that his > timeline mention of flu " was simply to flag an > event as worthy of closer scrutiny and higher > awareness, as there was absolutely no proof of > true involvement of this company in the outbreak. > A proper epidemiological investigation is > required to prove such links. " > Meanwhile, added the April 6 Wilson > timeline entry, " A health cordon was established > around La Gloria. Officials launched a spraying > and cleaning operation that targeted the fly > suspected to be the disease vector. State health > officials also implemented a vaccination campaign > against influenza, although sources noted > physicians ruled out influenza as the cause of > the outbreak. Finally, officials announced an > epidemiological investigation that focused on any > cases exhibiting symptoms since March 10. " > Ten days later, on April 16, wrote > Wilson, " Veratect reported the Oaxaca Health > Department indicated that an unspecified number > of atypical pneumonia cases were detected at the > Hospital Civil Aurelio Valdivieso in Reforma, > Oaxaca State, Mexico. No information was > provided about symptoms or treatment for the > cases. NSS Oaxaca reported that rumors were > circulating that human coronavirus was spreading > at the hospital; sources did not provide any > response to these statements from the hospital or > health officials. Laboratory samples were sent > to Mexico City for analysis. According to NSS > Oaxaca, health officials intensified preventive > measures aimed at mitigating further spread of > the disease. " > > Why " swine flu " ? > > Explained ProMED animal disease moderator > Peter Cowen on April 25, " The H1N1 virus is > called 'swine flu' because of the outbreak of the > 1918 virus that caused significant mortality in > both swine and human populations. The virus > probably has a wild bird origin, " as all > influenzas have evolved from avian diseases. > " Influenza viruses regularly circulate in > swine populations, " Cowen continued. " Swine flu > viruses have been known to infect humans, [but] > it appears as if no exposure to swine has > occurred among people who have come down with the > current novel H1N1 virus. Since we know nothing > of how this particular virus has gotten into the > human population, but there apparently is no > history of swine exposure, it probably makes > more sense epidemiologically to refer to this > simply as an H1N1 influenza. > " Unfortunately, " Cowen concluded, " the > name 'swine flu' will imply a simple transmission > between swine and people, when in reality its > origin and epidemiology are likely to be much > more complex. " > Elaborated fellow ProMED animal disease > moderator Arnon Shimshony, " Swine influenza in > senso stricto, " unlike the common use in > connection with the H1N1 virus afflicting humans, > " is an animal disease, caused by a specific > porcine virus. Swine influenza viruses are very > contagious, mainly affecting pigs, but can > sporadically cause disease in turkeys and humans. > Such an interspecies infection, when occurring, > is not followed by further spread in the affected > populations, " who become dead end hosts. > " The current influenza virus spreads > readily among humans without any known > involvement of, or contact with pigs, " > Shimshony emphasized. Thus, regardless of > origin, " The causative virus can persist among > humans independent of animal involvement. " > > Genetic link > > Assistant professor Raul Rabadan, PhD. > of the Department of Biomedical Informatics at > Columbia University on April 28 shared with > ProMed members the strongest medical hint before > ANIMAL PEOPLE went to press that the H1N1 > outbreak might be associated with pig farming. > But Rabadan's finding did not point directly > toward factory pig farming, or even to pig > farming per se. > " My group and I are analyzing the recent > sequences from the isolates in Texas and > California of swine H1N1 deposited in the > National Center for Biotechnology Inform-ation, " > Rabadan posted. " Preliminary analysis using all > the sequences in public databases suggests that > all segments are of swine origin, " contrary to > earlier reports that the new H1N1 virus included > elements from human and avian viruses. Rabadan's > team found the parts of the new virus " related to > Asian/European swine and the rest to North > American swine. There is also an interesting > substratification between these groups, " Rabadan > observed, " suggesting a multiple reassortment. " > Rabadan's findings pointed toward the new > H1N1 virus originating in pigs. However, the > mix of Asian/European swine and North American > swine virus segments may point toward hybridized > boars, commonly raised for hunting and the > restaurant trade-- and feral in much of North > America--rather than factory-farmed pig breeds. > However, reminded the British > Department of Food, Agriculture, and Rural > Affairs later in the day, " The virus has not > been isolated from pigs, and there have been no > reports of unusual disease in pig herds. > " H1N1 and H3N2 swine flu viruses are > endemic among pigs in many countries and > something that the industry deals with > routinely, " DEFRA continued. " Outbreaks among > pigs normally occur in late fall and winter. > U.S. studies have shown that between 30% and 50% > of the pig population have been exposed to H1N1 > infection at some time. Mexico does not > routinely report swine influenza, " DEFRA noted, > " so there is some uncertainty regarding the > situation in that country. " > However, DEFRA concluded, " We consider > there is a negligible likelihood of introducing > human influenza strain H1N1 to the U.K. by the > legal import of pigs or pig products from North > America. There is no evidence that meat or other > products would be contaminated with known strains > of virus. " > Commented the Office International des > Epizooties [World Organization for Animal Health] > in a parallel statement, " The virus has not been > isolated in animals to date. Therefore, it is > not justified to name this disease swine > influenza. Urgent scientific research must be > started in order to know the susceptibility of > animals to this new virus, " the OIE said, " and > if relevant to implement biosecurity measures, > including possible vaccination to protect > susceptible animals. " > > Mixing vessels > > Speaking before Rabadan released his > genetic findings, OIE director general Bernard > Vallat told Agence France-Presse that the new > H1N1 virus contains an avian strain of American > origin, and American swine strain and an > apparent Asian swine strain, and an American > human strain. But even with that mix, Vallat > explained, " There is no proof that this virus, > currently circulating among humans, really is of > animal origin. There is no element to support > this. " > Both pigs and humans are influenza > " mixing vessels, " within whom different flu > strains can meet, incubate, and mutate. > Regardless of the medical evidence, > animal advocates seized upon the H1N1 outbreak as > an opportunity to expose and denounce aspects of > factory farming other than disease transmission. > Posted Michigan activist Liska, > " What intensive confinement factory farming has > done to the animals, in terms of the cruelty > involved, the drugs used to offset the disease > and stress caused to the animals by how they are > overcrowded and not allowed to meet their basic > behavioral needs, etcetra, is going to come > back to haunt us until we change our ways, and > that doesn't even include the human side effects > from eating meat filled with antibiotics and > hormones. " > " For more than 23 years we have warned > that cramming thousands of animals into factory > farms is not only bad for the animals, " said > Farm Sanctuary cofounder Gene Baur. " These > stressful, filthy, disease-ridden confines are > also bad for humans. Animals packed by the > thousands in unnatural conditions suffer > immensely and these unhealthy, overcrowded > operations are a breeding ground for > disease--swine flu, avian flu, e-coli, > salmonella, mad cow diseaseŠFactory farms are a > prescription for disaster. " > Baur mentioned pending federal > legislation which, if passed, " would eliminate > the use of sub-therapeutic antibiotics on factory > farms. " > This measure is favored by most of the > human health community as well as animal > advocates, since heavy use of antibiotics in > farming is tending to increase the capacity of > infectious bacteria to resist antibiotic > treatment. --Merritt > Clifton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.