Guest guest Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 STAR BORES: ATTACK OF THE CLONES Well nothing can be more boorish then the wealthy and their frivolous spending, but this news article that is proliferating on the wire services this week is worthy of note to the animal welfare community: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7542338.stm But what it means to animal conservation efforts is not clear, as the privately owned company is marketing it's cloning service to the rich and famous first, with no mention of zoos on the company website: https://rnl.co.kr/eng/main.asp RNL BIO's website is interesting in it's own right, as one can find organic rice and dietary aids laced with genetic material, and also learn that stem-cell research is done in partnership with John Hopkins School of Medicine in the US. RNL is also producing cancer-sniffing canines as clones and even have a drug-sniffing variation as well. Well, I don't know about you, but I am starting to sniff something putrid in all of this: a Korean Company Cloning Canines. But putting my racism aside, there are many of us here that wish the breeding of wild animals in zoos (in the name of conservation) would stop, as there are just as many that support this effort - and then some that haggle over the details: is a Siberian-Bengal tiger breed in Canada really a tiger? But here is the question to all: is the commercial cloning of mammals a positive checkpoint on the animal welfare front or a negative one? Do you support RNL BIO's efforts in this regard, or are you ready to create an online petition and then hit the streets in protest? Personally, I am confused. If rich Americans want to clone Boogers at 10,000 usd a pop (that is the discounted rate by the way) then who am I to say this is stupid, noting that 50,000 usd for a litter of pups could be better spent elsewhere in the pet community. And if cloning companies start proliferating and creating camel clones for Sheiks in the mid-east, who am I to say this won't benefit mankind, or perhaps not, as the cost of this cloning will no doubt be passed on to the petro-consuming public. And if the wildlife conservation community somehow gets into the act (partnership/contracts with RNL BIO-associated companies), and starts cloning Bengal tigers in Nepal, for a re-population and re-balancing of the world ecosystem, who am I to question the wisdom in that? Still, something is stinking me thinks. Jigs in Nepal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.