Guest guest Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 From ANIMAL PEOPLE, September 2008: Pet Food Politics by Marion Nestle University of California Press (2120 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704), 2008. 219 pages, hardcover. $18.95. The China Health Ministry at this writing has just announced that the number of infants and young children known to have been poisoned by melamine mixed into powdered milk or baby formula has increased tenfold in 48 hours, to more than 54,000. Four children have died, 13,000 are hospitalized, and 40,000 children plus two orangutans and a lion cub at the Hangzhou Safari Park near Shanghai have required outpatient medical treatment for kidney stones caused by ingesting melamine, a coal derivative of no nutritional value. Most observers expect the toll to rise far higher. Eighteen alleged perpetrators face the death penalty. Most of this was foreseen by Marion Nestle in Pet Food Politics, detailing the melamine pet food contamination crisis of early 2007. Nestle subtitled Pet Food Politics " The Chihuahua in the coal mine " to emphasize that what happened to dogs and cats can happen to humans, too. Chiefly used to make plastics, melamine can also be added to foods to make them appear to have higher protein content than they really do, when tested using conventional methods. Accordingly, stirring melamine into " milk " powder that has already been diluted with cheaper substances such as chalk dust turns out to have been a cover tactic for unscrupulous distributors of Chinese dairy products, just as it was for unscrupulous Chinese sellers of pet food ingredients. As well as injuring many thousands of children in a nation of mandatory one-child families, the milk adulterators sold their tainted products to Bangladesh, Burundi, Gabon, Myanmar, Taiwan, and Yemen, where they almost certainly harmed many more children, mostly in nations of limited capacity to detect and respond effectively to the damage. Those nations' lack of ability to intercept poisoned milk powder parallels the lack of effective inspection and oversight of pet food production. The Swiss-based Nestle food manufacturing empire is resisting a request from the Hong Kong Center for Food Safety that Nestle Dairy Farm Pure Milk in one-litre packs sold to caterers be recalled, after melamine was reportedly found in one of 65 samples. Pet Food Politics author Marion Nestle has spent much of her career explaining that she has nothing to do with the Nestle food conglomerate. Her previous books include Food Politics: How the Food Industry influences Nutrition and Health, and Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. Pet Food Politics would appear to be a departure from Nestle's usual range, except that she also happens to be nutrition co-editor of The Bark magazine. Nestle knows dogs, as well as nutritional issues and the food industry. In particular, Nestle understands the most basic issue in manufacturing pet food. " As one dog food maker explained to me, " Nestle writes, " the products have to be nasty enough so a dog will eat them but look and smell good enough for pet owners to want to buy them. " A similar consideration applies to making cat food, with the difference that cats are top predators who want their food to smell and taste like a fresh kill. Dogs prefer theirs to have been dead for three days. " The manufacture of wet pet foods presents additional challenges, " continues Nestle. " For most pet food companies, it is easier and less expensive to give up control of production and contract out the making of wet pet foods to 'co-packers' such as Menu Foods, " which used 1,300 recipes, and for several months in 2006-2007 unknowingly included in many of them wheat, rice, and soy glutens which were imported from China and spiked with melamine. " Such recipes may differ in proportions of ingredients, " Nestle explains, " but the basic ingredients are much the same. So the recall produced this revelation: the contents of pet foods are much alike, and the most important difference between one brand and another is not nutrition; it is price. " Melamine in pet foods killed from 1,950 to 2,334 cats and 4,150 to 4,583 dogs, causing illness in 14,228 to 17,000, according to data collected by the Pet Connection web site and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. " The Chinese government, " already embarrassed by several previous food and drug adulteration episodes since 2004, " promptly announced that it intended to strengthen safety standards, increase inspections, require safety certifications, and tackle corruption in the food system and its oversight. And they would be testing for toxins in cooking oil, flour, beverages, and baby food, " reports Nestle. " In short order, China sent more than 33,000 inspectors into the field, conducted 10 million inspections, and shut down nearly 200 food manufacturers. Over the next few months, " Nestle recounts, " officials uncovered hundreds of thousands of food safety violations and closed down more than 150,000 unlicensed food businesses. The government said it would establish systems for food recalls, export inspections, and food safety standards, and would create a cabinet-level panel to oversee food safety and quality. " Former Chinese food and drug safety administration chief Zheng Xiaoyu, convicted of taking bribes to approve drugs, was executed on July 10, 2007. Concludes Nestle, " If we want our global food system to provide safe food for everyone, ensuring the safety of pets is as good a place as any to start. " Yet ensuring the safey of pets, to whatever extent it was achieved, proved insufficient to prevent a similar scandal from afflicting children in China and other nations, barely more than a year later. Responding to the pet food crisis was delayed, as Nestle details, because U.S. and Canadian laboratories initially had no idea what kind of contamination to look for. By now the effects of melamine ingestion are relatively easily recognized. Yet the agencies that could have moved promptly to reduce the risk to children were as sluggish in response to melamine in milk as they were when the problem was an unknown pollutant in pet food. The New Zealand dairy firm Fonterra purchased 43% of Sanlu, the largest Chinese dairy company, in late 2005. Sanlu milk suppliers were apparently already spiking their products with melamine. Sanlu received complaints about babies falling ill after consuming the contaminated products in December 2007, according to China Central Television, but did not discover that melamine was the cause of the illnesses until June 2008. Fonterra learned about the mela-mine contamination on August 2. Pressured by Fonterra to recall any products containing melamine, Sanlu the same day alerted the city government of Shijiazhuang, in Hebei province, where the company is based. But Shijiazhuang officials did not take the matter to their Hebei counterparts until September 9. By then Fonterra had already notified New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark about the melamine problem--but Clark did not move to warn China for three more days. Once China was officially notified, the response gathered speed. Chinese media disclosed the investigation on September 10. A day later, Hebei province deputy governor Yang Chongyong reported that as many as 373 milk suppliers to Sanlu had been found to have been adding melamine to powdered milk since as far back as April 2005. Thus children may have been made ill by melamine for nearly three years before the pet food contamination furor erupted-- and the adulteration continued even after the perpetrators should have known that they might be killing babies. Lest anyone believe this depravity is uniquely Chinese, let it be remembered that U.S. milk sellers in the early 20th century often spiked milk with formaldehyde to delay spoilage. Overdoses occasionally killed small children. Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 to address the problem, but " blue milk " scandals, so-called because the chemical methylene blue is used to detect formaldehyde in milk, remained frequent for another decade, until the advent of refrigeration ended the incentive for the adulteration. People who gave their cats milk were mostly safe all along. Though humans cannot smell formaldehyde in small doses, cats can, and if milk was tainted, cats wouldn't touch it. --Merritt Clifton -- Merritt Clifton Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE P.O. Box 960 Clinton, WA 98236 Telephone: 360-579-2505 Fax: 360-579-2575 E-mail: anmlpepl Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org [ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year; for free sample, send address.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.