Public Prosecution Fabricates Arson Attack

[Guest guest]

> In an attempt to justify remand custody and draconian police measures, a

> hunting cabin, which burnt down as a result of an over heating stove, was

> used against the animal protections as an accusation of arson

 

 

I would not jump to conclusions about this allegation,

either, which comes from a plainly partisan source aligned with the

defense.

 

On the one hand, hunters often carelessly burn down their

own cabins, which are typically heated by wood. Woodstoves are

notoriously dangerous, especially when not in continuous use and

maintenance, & accidents most certainly happen. (I heated with wood

for 13 years myself, and fought several chimney fires as a volunteer

firefighter.)

 

On the other, arsonists quite often try to disguise their

crimes as routine accidents. Among the most common dodges are faking

woodstove fires. Others include faking electrical fires and faking

spontaneous combustion.

 

(I also had occasion to participate in several arson

investigations, including several cases that were believed to be

accidents until the arsonists confessed, seeking lenient sentencing

for other offenses. One of those cases involved multiple fatalities.)

 

Normally people who heat with wood are aware of the hazards

and avoid doing anything as obviously stupid and dangerous as pushing

a woodstove against a wooden wall. Woodstove fires much more often

result from relatively subtle and invisible problems, including

clogged pipes and accumulations of creosote in chimneys.

 

Accordingly, I recommend reserving judgement in this

instance until further facts are known. If this involves a case that

at first looked like an accident but now has been reopened, it would

scarcely be unique.

 

 

 

--

Merritt Clifton

Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE

P.O. Box 960

Clinton, WA 98236

 

Telephone: 360-579-2505

Fax: 360-579-2575

E-mail: anmlpepl

Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

 

[ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing

original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide,

founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the

decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations.

We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year;

for free sample, send address.]