(IN): Terrorists are 'animals': SC judge

[Guest guest]

>Below you can find the interpretation of 'animal' by a senior Judge

>of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India where he compares a

>'Terrorist' with an 'Animal'.

 

 

Of considerably more concern to me than the above, in which

the judge at least says what he means, in asserting that terrorists

should have no more rights than animals, is this:

 

 

> " We should not talk about human rights violation of terrorists

 

 

First, reckless violation of the rights of others is the

essence of terrorism.

 

Second, the role of a judge is to uphold the rights of all

persons involved in matters of justice, including defendants.

 

Third, not all persons accused of terrorism, or any

offense, are actually guilty as charged, & it is the most basic

role of a judge to facilitate the discovery & determination of guilt

or innocence.

 

The judge should resign, having demonstrated himself to be

unfit to adjudicate parking tickets, let alone matters involving

either human rights or animal rights.

 

 

--

Merritt Clifton

Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE

P.O. Box 960

Clinton, WA 98236

 

Telephone: 360-579-2505

Fax: 360-579-2575

E-mail: anmlpepl

Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

 

[ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing

original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide,

founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the

decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations.

We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year;

for free sample, send address.]