Guest guest Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Can someone please tell us how to make sure that the anthrax viruses do not percolate into the only drinking water source of our area? What steps should be taken to ensure it? http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/Cities.aspx?SectionID=9R67TMeNb/w= & MainSectio\ nID=wIcBMLGbUJI= & SectionName=gUhH3Holuas= & show=3 Controversy over Elephant's burial Express News Service First Published : 05 Sep 2009 02:31:00 AM IST KOCHI: The burial of an elephant, which reportedly died of anthrax in Perumbavoor on Thursday, has kicked up a controversy. There are allegations that the pachyderm was buried, near the Muvattupuzha river, unscientifically and could pose a threat of polluting the river, a source of potable water in the district. The Elephant Lovers Association has demanded an inquiry into the death of the elephant. It was on Thursday that Unnikrishnan, an elephant owned by a saw mill owner in Perumbavoor, died. The Forest Department doctors confirmed that the elephant died of Anthrax. 'According to the rules, the carcass is the asset of the government and so the owner of the elephant will lose the right of ownership as soon as it is dead. So the animal should have been buried in the forest nearest to the place where the elephant died,' said V K Venkitachalam, Elephant Lovers Association. 'Moreover, if the elephant died of Anthrax, burying the elephant near the river could pollute drinking water used by millions. The Anthrax bacterium can live for more than two decades,' he said. 'We alerted the forest officials. But no necessary steps were taken to ensure that the law was upheld,' he added. But the officials with the forest department said that they acted according to the rules. 'We called the veterinary doctors of the department and they confirmed that the pachyderm died of Anthrax. Later, the carcass was buried at Arakkuzha near Muvattupuzha as per the instructions of the doctors,' said P Biju, range officer, Kodandu range. The forest officials say that there was nothing illegal in allowing the owner of the elephant to bury it at his expense. But those opposing this argument say that it was against the directive of the Union Government. 'According to the directive of the Union Government, the body of the elephant is the property of the government. So the officials should not have handed over the carcass to the elephant owner,' said A G Babu, member, State Animal Welfare Board. The doctors with the forest department say that the carcass would not pose any threat to the public health if it is buried in a scientific manner. 'If the carcass is buried, it should be in a pit at least six feet deep. It should be placed on a bed made of lime, said Dr Easwaran. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.