Guest guest Posted October 26, 2009 Report Share Posted October 26, 2009 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6416683/Pet-dogs-as-b\ ad-for-planet-as-driving-4x4s-book-claims.html # Pet dogs as bad for planet as driving 4x4s, book claims Owners should consider doing without, downsizing or even eating their pets to help save the planet, according to a new book. By Paul Stokes Published: 7:35PM BST 23 Oct 2009 Bo Obama Photo: REUTERS It claims that the carbon footprint left by domesticated animals is out of proportion to the size of their paws. A medium-sized dog has the same impact as a Toyota Land Cruiser driven 6,000 miles a year, while a cat is equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf. Related Articles - Anti-fouling campaign features toddler eating dog mess<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5812486/Anti-foulin\ g-campaign-features-toddler-eating-dog-mess.html> - Peta under fire over claim that it kills most animals left at its US headquarters<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/5106600/Pe\ ta-under-fire-over-claim-that-it-kills-most-animals-left-at-its-US-headquarters.\ html> - Pet Subjects: when dogs wake up, mother cats and prescription charges<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/4175725/Pet-Subjects-when-dogs-wake-up\ -mother-cats-and-prescription-charges.html> - Fury as Denmark proposes cull of mongrel But rabbits and chickens are eco-friendly because they provide meat for their owners while a canary or a goldfish has little effect on the environment. At the same time a pair of hamsters do the same damage as running a plasma television, suggests the book Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living. New Zealand-based authors Robert and Brenda Vale base their findings on the amount of land needed to grow food for pets ranging from budgerigars to cats and dogs. They say an average Collie eats 164kg of meat and 95kg of cereals a year, giving it a high impact on the planet. But a pair of rabbits can produce 36 young annually, which would provide 72kg of meat and help decrease the owner's carbon footprint. Mr Vale, an architect who specialises in sustainable living, said: " There are no recipes in the book. We're not actually saying it is time to eat the dog. " We're just saying that we need to think about and know the (ecological) impact of some of the things we do and that we take for granted. " He explained that sustainability issues require us to make choices which are " as difficult as eating your dog " . Mr Vale added: " Once you see where cats and dogs fit in your overall balance of things, you might decide to have the cat but not also to have the two cars and the three bathrooms and be a meat-eater yourself. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Shub, I am so glad u posted this one...saved me the trouble! But I was too upset when I read this in New Scientist the other day, as they used German Sheppard as the example, saying that my Krypto has a carbon ³paw print² equal to 2 Toyota SUVs running full speed for 10,000 Kilometres. What a load of dog poop! There are an ever increasing number of pseudo scientific authors doing anything to cash in on the climate change frenzy, including using stupid titles like ³Time to Eat the Dog.² Robert and Brenda Vale are just two examples. It¹s all part of the concentrated effort to blame environmental ruin on you, your dog, and your hamster. This distracts us all from the burning of the rainforest and other massive corporate destructions taking place. The real thieves of the planet are roaming free, while dogs and hamsters are now under suspicion and soon to be indicted. I have not read the book (and it may contains valuable insight), but sensationalism at this height and at the expense of innocent animals is unacceptable and should not be condoned. Perhaps if the authors had titled the work ³Time to Eat Your Slaughter House Owners,² I might be interested...but then again, that title would never make it to the NYT Bestsellers list... Jigs in Nepal Ps.If anyone does read this work, please let us know if Prince Charles is blamed there for raising carbon levels, as he does have a lot of pet frogs:) Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:22:26 +0530 AAPN List <aapn > Pet dogs damaging the environment, claims book http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6416683/Pet-dogs- as-bad-for-planet-as-driving-4x4s-book-claims.html # Pet dogs as bad for planet as driving 4x4s, book claims Owners should consider doing without, downsizing or even eating their pets to help save the planet, according to a new book. By Paul Stokes Published: 7:35PM BST 23 Oct 2009 Bo Obama Photo: REUTERS It claims that the carbon footprint left by domesticated animals is out of proportion to the size of their paws. A medium-sized dog has the same impact as a Toyota Land Cruiser driven 6,000 miles a year, while a cat is equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf. Related Articles - Anti-fouling campaign features toddler eating dog mess<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5812486/Anti-fo uling-campaign-features-toddler-eating-dog-mess.html> - Peta under fire over claim that it kills most animals left at its US headquarters<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/51066 00/Peta-under-fire-over-claim-that-it-kills-most-animals-left-at-its-US-head quarters.html> - Pet Subjects: when dogs wake up, mother cats and prescription charges<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/4175725/Pet-Subjects-when-dogs-wak e-up-mother-cats-and-prescription-charges.html> - Fury as Denmark proposes cull of mongrel But rabbits and chickens are eco-friendly because they provide meat for their owners while a canary or a goldfish has little effect on the environment. At the same time a pair of hamsters do the same damage as running a plasma television, suggests the book Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living. New Zealand-based authors Robert and Brenda Vale base their findings on the amount of land needed to grow food for pets ranging from budgerigars to cats and dogs. They say an average Collie eats 164kg of meat and 95kg of cereals a year, giving it a high impact on the planet. But a pair of rabbits can produce 36 young annually, which would provide 72kg of meat and help decrease the owner's carbon footprint. Mr Vale, an architect who specialises in sustainable living, said: " There are no recipes in the book. We're not actually saying it is time to eat the dog. " We're just saying that we need to think about and know the (ecological) impact of some of the things we do and that we take for granted. " He explained that sustainability issues require us to make choices which are " as difficult as eating your dog " . Mr Vale added: " Once you see where cats and dogs fit in your overall balance of things, you might decide to have the cat but not also to have the two cars and the three bathrooms and be a meat-eater yourself. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.