(IN): Tigers are not safe even in the best of India's reserves

[Guest guest]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/opinion/edit-page/In-the-forests-of-the-\

night/articleshow/5708888.cms

 

epaper:

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Client.asp?Daily=TOIM & showST=true & Enter=t\

rue & Skin=TOINEW & GZ=T

 

 

 

IN THE FORESTS OF THE NIGHT

 

Tigers are not safe even in the best of India’s reserves

 

 

The tiger has become the latest expression of political correctness. Look

around: schoolchildren on roads, national icons on screens and big brands in

campaign mode. The government has pumped in additional funds. Conservation

NGOs are mushrooming in all corners of India. Green blogging is catching on

like wildfire.

 

Under the spotlight, tigers are still dying frequent, unnatural deaths. To

understand why, let us focus on India's most pampered tiger reserve.

 

The crown jewel of dry, deciduous tiger forests, Rajasthan's Ranthambore

generates huge tourism revenue and attracts billions in government and

non-government funding. This was the reserve the prime minister visited to

assess the conservation crisis in 2005 after the infamous extinction of

tigers in Sariska. Within a few months, two top forest officials were

shifted out of Ranthambore when poachers arrested by Rajasthan police

admitted to killing over 20 tigers there. Then, a beleaguered state forest

department channelled its energy to Ranthambore to stage a face-saver.

 

Unlike many other tiger reserves, Ranthambore never fell off the radar. And

still, tigers have been dying here with alarming regularity. The latest is

the case of two young males, poisoned to death.

 

The Rajasthan forest department was not short of explanations. First,

officials told the media that there were too many tigers and when the

surplus tigers moved out, their future became uncertain. Then they rued that

such tragedies could have been avoided had the Centre not suspended shifting

tigers to Sariska after the first three animals were moved. (For the record,

the tiger relocation drive was put on hold after three siblings were

arbitrarily picked up for rebuilding a population and the Centre ordered DNA

tests to ascertain the breeding compatibility of Ranthambore tigers before

selecting right individuals for Sariska.)

 

The Ranthambore tiger reserve spans 1,300 sq km and has about 40 tigers.

This is hardly anywhere near the saturation mark. Corbett tiger reserve has

four times as many tigers in as much area. So how do forest officials claim

saturation tiger density in Ranthambore? Well, when they say Ranthambore,

they refer to the 300 sq km national park that is only a small part of the

1,300 sq km tiger reserve.

 

Most of Ranthambore's tigers are inside this prey-rich, well-protected 300

sq km national park area. The remaining 1,000 sq km of the reserve Sawai Man

Singh sanctuary, Kela Devi sanctuary and reserve forests has little natural

prey and no protection. One would have expected the forest department to

take control of the entire reserve, stop grazing, reclaim encroachments and

resettle villages but the authorities have washed their hands of more than

75 per cent of the tiger reserve.

 

So when we hear them say tigers are going out of Ranthambore, the big cats

are in fact moving from one part of the reserve to another. The latest

killings were reported from Taldakhet, a village of just five large families

in Keladevi sanctuary, hardly a kilometre from the national park boundary,

well inside the tiger reserve. Yet the media was told the deaths occurred

because the tigers were pushed out of a saturated Ranthambore.

 

About 300 sq km of the national park area may not accommodate more than

30-40 tigers but the remaining 1,000 sq km of the reserve has the potential

of absorbing thrice as many. Active management demands the forest department

to secure the sanctuary areas of the reserve and then focus on reclaiming

the corridors Kuno in Madhya Pradesh to Ramgarh Bisdhari sanctuary near

Bundi for natural dispersal of big cats. Instead, the authorities conceded

three-fourths of the reserve as a death zone and now seek to save " surplus "

tigers by airlifting them to Sariska.

 

Of seven tigers forest authorities claim to have now moved out of

Ranthambore, five are in Sawai Man Singh sanctuary, one in Kela Devi

sanctuary and only one has actually moved out towards Kota. Two sub-adult

tigers moved out of the reserve last year, not because of overpopulation but

because the cubs were left directionless after their mother was poached.

Despite receiving Rs 93 lakh from the Centre during 2008-09 to set up a

special tiger protection force, Ranthambore remains vulnerable to poisoning

or commercial poaching. The latest victims were poisoned close to a village

deep inside the reserve.

 

This brings Ranthambore's ongoing village relocation drive under the

scanner. With Rs 104 crore released by the Centre, state authorities have so

far listed about 1,200 families in half a dozen villages and started with

the biggest village, Hindwar. It is not clear why removal of big villages on

black-top roads became their priority when small, strategically placed

villages like Taldakhet or Mordungri (where a tigress was poisoned in 2008)

pose a far greater danger to wildlife.

 

Common sense says it is easier to relocate small villages where public

opinion tends to be less divided and chances of half the village staying

back (as is happening in Hindwar) are far less. But small villages also mean

fewer families and a smaller relocation budget a factor that could have

influenced some enterprising minds.

 

 

http://mazoomdaar.blogspot.com

http://sariskastory.blogspot.com

http://truthofthetiger.blogspot.com

 

 

 

 

--

http://www.stopelephantpolo.com

http://www.freewebs.com/azamsiddiqui