Guest guest Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Dear all, Dr Mel Richardson was one of the supporters of the Central Zoo Authority Directive on Indian zoo elephants. Here is his response on elephant polo. Article also on his views on use of the ankus. Both can be used on the website. Best wishes, Here is my response, use as you see fit. I met my first elephant in 1969 at the Atlanta Zoo, I was a 19 year old zoo keeper and she was 47+ year old Asian elephant named Alice. She arrived at the zoo in 1940 when her owner, a private farmer in South Carolina enlisted in the army and needed to secure a permanent home for Alice. I was being trained as a back up elephant keeper. While Ed the regular keeper and I trimmed her cuticles on her right front foot, she had to stand putting all of her front end weight on her left leg. That leg was stiff and reportedly was broken when she was young. When we would not let her remove her right foot from the tub, enforced by a bull hook placed behind her heel, she placed her trunk tip in her mouth biting down on it whimpering and at the same time tears rolled down from her eyes. The pain on her bad leg was too much. That moment opened my eyes to the reality that elephants have the same emotions and feelings as we do. As keeper and eventually as veterinarian now for the last 28 years, I have known and worked with more than 84 elephants in captivity. In 1982-84 I worked for an animal dealer in Texas, who imported more than forty baby African elephant orphans…orphaned by the culling operations in Zimbabwe. I provided veterinary care to the babies as they were broken for their future lives in captivity. I treated the abscesses and skin infections caused by hook wounds and rope burns to their legs. It is called 'breaking' because the goal is to break the elephants spirit so that as it matures it only needs occasional reminders that man is in control. If the elephants being used in Elephant Polo were 'playing' of their own free will, there would be no issue. Obviously they are not. These elephants have been captured young and tormented, starved, and sleep deprived in order to break them so that the trainer can coerce them to do his bidding. The elephants are being abused for entertainment and profit. I urge the governments of countries that allow such flagrant disregard for elephant welfare to crack down on organizers of these barbaric spectacles. I call upon Western tourists to boycott countries that allow elephant polo. Boycott companies that provide advertising capital for such events. Boycott Elephant Polo! Dr. Mel Richardson, Veterinarian A veterinarian with 40 years of experience, currently establishing Alliance for Zoo Animal Welfare, an organization dedicated to improving the care and welfare of captive wild animals. Dr. Mel Richardson Veterinarian Dr. Mel Richardson: No good reasons for elephant trainers to use bull hooks - BY Dr. Mel Richardson - Posted March 2, 2010 at 1 a.m. Dr. Mel Richardson, veterinarian A tool of elephant trainers has been around for centuries. It essentially is a fireplace poker with a sharp point to push and a sharp hook to pull. And whether you call it an ankus, a bull hook or a guide (the favored politically correct term currently in use by zoos and circuses), it is in my experience all too often just a cruel weapon. Zoo spokesmen, like Jack Hanna, claim the hook is meant merely to tell the elephant to come along, no different than me taking you behind the elbow and leading you. I asked a friend and longtime elephant handler: If this were the case, then why wouldn’t a wooden cane work? His reply was simple: “Mel, if it doesn’t hurt, the elephant will not respond to it.” At one point in my career, I was veterinarian for an animal dealer in Texas with 52 elephants under my care. The majority were 2- to 5-year-old African orphans from the elephant culls in Zimbabwe, where adults were slaughtered to control the overpopulation in the parks. I witnessed the brutality of the training or breaking of these babies. I treated their cuts, lacerations and abscesses from the use of the bull hook. I have seen the skin over the lower jaw of a baby elephant actually slough off, due to the repeated “hooking” and subsequent infection set up by the trauma of breaking. It is called breaking, in that the goal is to break the baby’s spirit so that he or she literally succumbs to your every wish. The hook is an instrument of intimidation and domination. Without this cruel weapon and the fear it engenders, circuses cannot make the elephants perform unnatural behaviors, such as headstands, walking on hind legs or balancing on balls. Zoo defenders of the bull hook justify its use claiming it causes no harm, which is patently a lie. They insist the tool is needed to control the elephants for medical exams and treatments. They continue to advocate working elephants in a “free contact” program, using the hook to maintain their dominance. I have worked elephants in a “protected contact” system, in which I stand outside of the elephants’ enclosure protected by an iron wall. Through windows I can draw blood, examine and care for their feet. Critics claim the elephants will not cooperate in such a system. But experience has proven protected contact works and hooks are unnecessary. You cannot control a wild adult four- to five-ton elephant with a bull hook. But if you take calves like Ringling’s Barack at less than a year and break them with the use of hooks, the hook then becomes a reminder of the trainer’s control over the elephant. YouTube is replete with behind-the-scenes footage of handlers “reminding” elephants about to perform, with a hook to the mouth or behind the ear, just for good measure. Richardson, a veterinarian from Paradise, Calif., has more than 40 years of experience, observing, treating and providing care for a wide variety of captive wild animal species, including elephants. He is a captive wild animal consultant establishing Alliance for Zoo Animal Welfare, an organization dedicated to improving the care and welfare of captive wild animals. http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2010/mar/02/dr-mel-richardson-no-good-reasons-for-ele\ phant/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.