Guest guest Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2007nl/oct/fav5.htm DNA Testing Proves Humans Are Designed as Starch Eaters Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation by George H. Perry published in the October 2007 issue of Nature Genetics found that there are more copies of genes that produce starch-digesting enzymes, known as amylases, in the human saliva than there are in lesser primates. The average human has roughly three times more copies of the salivary amylase genes than do fruit-eating apes and monkeys. Even among humans the number of copies was dependent upon the amount of starchy vegetables in their respective diets. For example, populations who eat more starch (such as rural Japanese) were found to have more copies than do people living on lower starch diets with meat and fish added (for example, Yakut of the Arctic). These findings confirm the predominant importance of starchy vegetables and grains in the human diet. (Amylases are enzymes secreted by the salivary glands and pancreas to break down starches into maltose-a double-sugar made up of two glucose molecules-and dextrin. The genes that produce amylase are not present at all in the saliva of carnivorous animals, such as cats, because these animals are not supposed to eat starchy vegetables.) Comment: The researchers begin their article by noting, "Starch consumption is a prominent characteristic of agricultural societies and hunter-gatherers in arid environments." Recorded human history tells of most populations living on starch-based diets. Some examples are the ancient Egyptians who lived on wheat, the Incas who lived on potatoes, the Aztecs and Mayans who lived on corn, and the Japanese who lived on buckwheat and later rice. The few peoples who have based their diets on meat have lived at the extremes of the earth's environment, such as the Eskimos in the Arctic and a few small gatherings living deep in the jungles of South America and Africa. These researchers reasoned further that starchy foods, like tubers, were crucial to the successful evolution of early humans, because starches offer important advantages. Their abundant, readily-available calories provide for the energy required for the evolutionary enlargement of our brains. The modern human brain uses 20% of our daily calories, and the preferred fuel for the brain is glucose, derived most efficiently by digesting starches. With attainment of the knowledge of the use of fire, which occurred concurrently with our brain development, starches became a goldmine of brain-feeding calories. The ability to use starch also opened up the opportunity for early humans to migrate out of Africa-to colonize of the rest of the planet. Starches were widely distributed geographically and easy to gather-tubers, like potatoes, are easily dug up out of the ground. Bulbs, corms, and tubers act as underground storage units for concentrated starches and last in the ground throughout the winter. These starches were a critical food source for the ancestors of early and modern humans. Once harvested, starches, such as potatoes and grains, can be stored at ambient temperatures for long periods of time-providing nutrition throughout the year. Fruit eating would not offer these advantages because fruits are relatively low in calories, spoil quickly, and in the more northern and southern latitudes fruits are available only seasonally. Primates who live on fruit diets are tied to the tropical jungles. Proponents of meat-based diets preach that the introduction of meat into the human diet was responsible for the evolutionary development of the human brain. One of this study's principle authors said this theory is improbable. Nathaniel Dominy pointed out, "Even when you look at modern human hunter-gatherers, meat is a relatively small fraction of their diet. They cooperate with language, use nets; they have poisoned arrows, even, and still it's not that easy to hunt meat. To think that, two to four million years ago, a small-brained, awkwardly bipedal animal could efficiently acquire meat, even by scavenging, just doesn't make a whole lot of sense." Before the availability of DNA testing many other observations have proven we are designed to be primarily plant-eaters. Our teeth are for grinding, not the tearing of animal flesh. Our intestines are long and convoluted for digestion of fibrous plant-foods; meat-eaters' intestines are much shorter and relatively simple for quickly digesting and eliminating the digested flesh. For a more complete discussion of our anatomy and physiology which establishes us as primarily plant-food eaters see my July 2003 newsletter: Meat in the Human Diet. Through the modern science of DNA we have discovered an essential truth locked in our genes: humans are starch eaters. The failure to abide by this truth has resulted in unprecedented human disease due to malnutrition from over-nutrition, and an impending environmental collapse from the livestock industries supporting Western people's perverse diet. Applying correct information about human nutrition results in miraculous cures of dietary diseases (for example, obesity, type-2 diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, and the ravages of atherosclerosis). The eventual return of humans to their starch-based diet will be a huge step in solving our environmental crises, as well. Perry GH, Dominy NJ, Claw KG, Lee AS, et al. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1256-60. Epub 2007 Sep 9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.