Question about amt. of viable members here

Posted June 26, 2008 · June 26, 2008

Iam also partial to a spot of red....

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156 Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 10:26:07 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I'm a wine gal myself. I was thrilled when I found out that Yellow Tail is vegan, because their pinot noir is fab for the price!

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Thanks for clearing it up.

I dont believe in much realy, the earth, the sky, the seasons, tangable things I can see , feel, and affect my life directlty I suppose..... beer?...: )

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.com

Thursday, 26 June, 2008 10:19:43 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Worship as in yes, like any other religion.

And yes, there are people who worship the Roman gods also (not all of them are the same).

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.com

Thursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address?

Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 26, 2008 · June 26, 2008

ï»¿

Hi Peter

I know someone who worships Roman gods... I don't know much about the practicalities of it, as I've never asked, but there are a few of them about :-)

BB

Peter

-

Peter VV

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156 Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 26, 2008 · June 26, 2008

ï»¿

Hopefully not :-)

Jo

-

Peter VV

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

you think I could stop for a couple of days?

Peter vv

heartwerk <jo.heartwork > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat group :-)In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member, there is a small core of posters.Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine question) think that would encourage people to post?Jo@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:>> Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather> > > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.> > > > > yarrow > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM > @gro ups.com > Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here > > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:> >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the> >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all> >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts> >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other> >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there> >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since> >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many> >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and> >why we aren't hearing from the others.> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once > in a while something interesting comes along.> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first > join, then never again.> > > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out." - Bill Moyers>

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 26, 2008 · June 26, 2008

ï»¿

Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156 > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 26, 2008 · June 26, 2008

Bob Marley, did. Although I on occasion do that, too, but in the shower --- On Thu, 6/26/08, jo <jo.heartwork wrote:jo <jo.heartworkRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 6:08 PM

ï»¿

Who did 'Don't worry, be happy'?

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Heather, Heather, Heather,

I dont have a clue what I am going on about half the time, but it seems to keep some people amused, dont be put off, just post anything you like. Everyone has a delte button, and even the most silly posts ( like the one I sent on Alicia Silverstones dogs farting less since they became vegan ) can generate some interesting rapport, so dont feel self concious, or worry, be happy.waffle. ......... ......I just did......... .......

Peter vv

Heather Farlow <farjoy2 >@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 3:16:29 AMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comWednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.

peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.

yarrow Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM @gro ups.com Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:>....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the>same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all>wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts>from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other>1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there>from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since>the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many>members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and>why we aren't hearing from the others.Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once in a while something interesting comes along.I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first join, then never again.â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Bobby Mcferrin

oh why bacchus do i know that?

jo Jun 26, 2008 3:08 PM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Who did 'Don't worry, be happy'?

Jo

-

Peter VV

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Heather, Heather, Heather,

I dont have a clue what I am going on about half the time, but it seems to keep some people amused, dont be put off, just post anything you like. Everyone has a delte button, and even the most silly posts ( like the one I sent on Alicia Silverstones dogs farting less since they became vegan ) can generate some interesting rapport, so dont feel self concious, or worry, be happy.waffle................I just did................

Peter vv

Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 3:16:29 AMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comWednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.

peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.

yarrow Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM @gro ups.com Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:>....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the>same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all>wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts>from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other>1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there>from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since>the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many>members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and>why we aren't hearing from the others.Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once in a while something interesting comes along.I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first join, then never again.â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do any of you live in Texas? I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?jo <jo.heartwork Sent: Thursday,

June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿

Hopefully not :-)

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

you think I could stop for a couple of days?

Peter vv

heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat group :-)In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member, there is a small core of posters.Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine question) think that would encourage people to post?Jo@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:>> Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather> > > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.> > > > > yarrow > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM > @gro ups.com > Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here > > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:> >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the> >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all> >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts> >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other> >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there> >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since> >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many> >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and> >why we aren't hearing from the others.> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once > in a while something interesting comes along.> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first > join, then never again.> > > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out." - Bill Moyers>

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Thanks. LOL - does everyone sing in the shower/bath?

I usually have music going through my mind, and sometimes sing

quietly (apart from at concerts when I sing as loud as I can). I

have an Opeth tune on my mind at present, but I don't know the words,

but one line sounds like 'tea and tomatoes', which I know it is not.

I shall have to look up the lyrics!

Jo

, Beatriz <searchingalight

wrote:

>

> Bob Marley, did. Although I on occasion do that, too, but in the

shower

>

> --- On Thu, 6/26/08, jo <jo.heartwork wrote:

> jo <jo.heartwork

> Re: Question about amt. of " viable " members

here

>

> Thursday, June 26, 2008, 6:08 PM

>

ï»¿

>

> Who did 'Don't worry, be happy'?

> Â

> Jo

> Â

>

> -

>

> Peter VV

>

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21

> PM

> Re: Question about

> amt. of " viable " members here

>

> Heather, Heather, Heather,

> I dont have a clue what I am going on about half the time, but it

seems to

> keep some people amused, dont be put off, just post anything you

like.

> Everyone has a delte button, and even the most silly posts ( like

the one I

> sent on Alicia Silverstones dogs farting less since they became

vegan ) can

> generate some interesting rapport, so dont feel self concious, or

worry, be

> happy.waffle. ......... ......I just did......... .......

>

> Â

>

> Peter vv

>

> -----

> Original Message ----

> Heather Farlow

> <farjoy2 >

> @gro ups.com

> Sent:

> Thursday, 26 June, 2008 3:16:29 AM

> Re: Question about

> amt. of " viable " members here

>

> Sometimes

> it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post,

its just that

> we don't know what to say. IfÂ someone other then the 4 main

members of

> this group post something,Â it usually turns into a conversation

between

> the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if

someone posted a

> survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it

is quite

> often) then I would be among the first to reply. Â Just my

> opinion--Heather

>

> -----

> Original Message ----

> fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin

> k.net>

> @gro ups.com

> Wednesday, June 25, 2008

> 7:00:33 PM

> Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

> members here

>

> sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it

isn't

> vicious or likewise.

> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we

chat. we

> bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you

(or anyone)

> wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.

>

> -----Original

> Message-----

> yarrow

> Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM

> To:

> @gro ups.com

> Re: Question about amt.

> of " viable " members here

>

> At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:

> >....then I checked the

> archives back a year and saw that it's been the

> >same three people

> posting most of the time. There's nothing at all

> >wrong with that,

> & I " ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts

> >from those

> three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other

> >1000+ people

> are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there

> >from names that

> weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since

> >the membership

> is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many

> >members are in the

> bouncing list, and how many are " really " here, and

> >why we aren't

> hearing from the others.

>

> Sometimes it *does* look like a private

> conversation among those

> three (usually not about veg topics), so if

> anyone else does post, it

> gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get

> filtered into the

> veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often

> I don't have

> time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed

> out some

> e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then

> once

> in a while something interesting comes along.

>

> I've noticed

> that some people post once or twice when they first

> join, then never

> again.

>

> â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the

house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it

out.â€ - Bill Moyers

>

> Not happy with your email address?

> Get the one you really want

> - millions of new email addresses available now at

>

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Ah yes - that's the version I know.

Jo

Re: Question about amt. of " viable " members here

Bobby Mcferrin

oh why bacchus do i know that?

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Hi

Just butt in - really. It doesn't matter whether you are replying to

a post a week old, or brand new. As you will have noticed, I can't

help but butt in!

I live in England, but have visited Germany and it was pretty dire -

even the vegetable soup apparently has bacon in it. Luckily we were

self-catering, but it would have been nice to eat out. Did your

daughter have a good time, apart from the food?

Jo

, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 wrote:

>

> I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the

conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know

how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do

any of you live in Texas?

> I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from

Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I

know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

>

> jo <jo.heartwork

>

> Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PM

> Re: Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

members here

>

> ï»¿

> Hopefully not :-)

>

> Jo

>

> -

> Peter VV

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

> Re: Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

members here

>

> you think I could stop for a couple of days?

>

> Peter vv

>

> ----- Original Message ----

> heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM

> Re: Question about amt. of " viable " members

here

>

> LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat

> group :-)

>

> In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member,

there

> is a small core of posters.

>

> Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few

> days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine

> question) think that would encourage people to post?

>

> Jo

>

> @gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2@ >

wrote:

> >

> > Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't

want

> to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other

> then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually

> turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can

be

> intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not

> directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I

would

> be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

> >

> > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>

> > @gro ups.com

> > Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM

> > Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

members

> here

> >

> > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

> > anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it

> isn't vicious or likewise.

> > peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we

chat.

> we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you

> (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please

feel

> free.

> >

> > yarrow@

> > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM

> > @gro ups.com

> > Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

members

> here

> >

> > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:

> > >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's

been

> the

> > >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at

all

> > >wrong with that, & I " ve had plenty of interests in some of the

> posts

> > >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the

other

> > >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and

there

> > >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but

> since

> > >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many

> > >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are " really "

here,

> and

> > >why we aren't hearing from the others.

> >

> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those

> > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does

post,

> it

> > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the

> > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't

have

> > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out

some

> > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then

> once

> > in a while something interesting comes along.

> >

> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first

> > join, then never again.

> >

> > " We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the

> house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it

> out. " - Bill Moyers

> >

>

> ________________________________

> Not happy with your email address?

> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses

available now at

>

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

ï»¿

Hi Beatriz

I think there may be different songs with the same name... or possibly someone covered it in the mid 1980s. The one I know was done by Bobby McFerrin... and I'm very impressed that I can remember the name!

BB

Peter

-

Beatriz

Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:51 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Bob Marley, did. Although I on occasion do that, too, but in the shower --- On Thu, 6/26/08, jo <jo.heartwork wrote:

jo <jo.heartworkRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 6:08 PM

ï»¿

Who did 'Don't worry, be happy'?

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Heather, Heather, Heather,

I dont have a clue what I am going on about half the time, but it seems to keep some people amused, dont be put off, just post anything you like. Everyone has a delte button, and even the most silly posts ( like the one I sent on Alicia Silverstones dogs farting less since they became vegan ) can generate some interesting rapport, so dont feel self concious, or worry, be happy.waffle. ......... ......I just did......... .......

Peter vv

Heather Farlow <farjoy2 >@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 3:16:29 AMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comWednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.

peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.

yarrow Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM @gro ups.com Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:>....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the>same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all>wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts>from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other>1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there>from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since>the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many>members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and>why we aren't hearing from the others.Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once in a while something interesting comes along.I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first join, then never again.â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Hi Peter,Hm, seems to be the same song, and as per wiki and if I got it right it was written by Bobby McFerrin. So, You are absolutely right. Bob Marley may have interpreted it as well.Here goes a link to youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjnvSQuv-H4 & amp;feature=relatedEnjoy:)Extremely Bright Blessings to You, too :)Beatriz--- On Fri, 6/27/08, Peter <metalscarab wrote:Peter <metalscarabRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 5:10 AM

ï»¿

Hi Beatriz

I think there may be different songs with the same name... or possibly someone covered it in the mid 1980s. The one I know was done by Bobby McFerrin... and I'm very impressed that I can remember the name!

BB

Peter

-

Beatriz

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:51 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Bob Marley, did. Although I on occasion do that, too, but in the shower --- On Thu, 6/26/08, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here@gro ups.comThursday, June 26, 2008, 6:08 PM

ï»¿

Who did 'Don't worry, be happy'?

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Heather, Heather, Heather,

I dont have a clue what I am going on about half the time, but it seems to keep some people amused, dont be put off, just post anything you like. Everyone has a delte button, and even the most silly posts ( like the one I sent on Alicia Silverstones dogs farting less since they became vegan ) can generate some interesting rapport, so dont feel self concious, or worry, be happy.waffle. ......... ......I just did......... .......

Peter vv

Heather Farlow <farjoy2 >@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 3:16:29 AMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comWednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PMRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.

peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.

yarrow Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM @gro ups.com Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:>....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the>same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all>wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts>from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other>1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there>from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since>the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many>members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and>why we aren't hearing from the others.Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once in a while something interesting comes along.I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first join, then never again.â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Thaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnkkkkkkkssssssssssssss!!! --- On Thu, 6/26/08, jo <jo.heartwork wrote:jo <jo.heartworkRe: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 4:15 PM

Yay :-) Glad you are here. You won't get on my nerves.

Jo

-

Beatriz

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:17 PM

Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I just joined a couple of days ago but am also here. Very, very here."Really really really here" :DSorry, folks, cant help it, I love talking nonsense. Let me know if that goes on anybody's nerves :SBeatriz--- On Wed, 6/25/08, stephen hawkey <stedhawk (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

stephen hawkey <stedhawk (AT) (DOT) co.uk>Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here@gro ups.comWednesday, June 25, 2008, 5:18 PM

Im really here well I hope im really here metaphorically speaking its possible im not here but metapsysically im here in body at least!!

Steve --- On Wed, 25/6/08, qweiop75 <qweiop75 > wrote:

qweiop75 <qweiop75 > Question about amt. of "viable" members here@gro ups.comWednesday, 25 June, 2008, 9:10 PM

Hi, I'm glad to find this group & glad to be here! I was also glad to see how active the group is (wow! over 400+ posts per month!) although once I saw all that email in my box in just 24 hours, I quickly changed it to no delivery lest I lose track of those more crucial to my daily existence ....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other 1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and why we aren't hearing from the others. Anybody care to chime in?

Sent from Mail. A Smarter Email.

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

She had a great time. She was visiting friends from here that were over there in the military. Her friend lives off post, but they were aware she was vegan before having her out there, so they made sure she had food. Just like you though, they had a hard time eating out. She went to the black forest and ordered something in one of the eateries and they told her there was no way to "veganize" anything. They wouldn't even server salad with the meat on the side. Very unopen to our lifestyle for being a tourist city! ----- Original Message

----heartwerk <jo.heartwork Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:53:54 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Hi

Just butt in - really. It doesn't matter whether you are replying to

a post a week old, or brand new. As you will have noticed, I can't

help but butt in!

I live in England, but have visited Germany and it was pretty dire -

even the vegetable soup apparently has bacon in it. Luckily we were

self-catering, but it would have been nice to eat out. Did your

daughter have a good time, apart from the food?

Jo

@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:

>

> I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the

conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know

how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do

any of you live in Texas?

> I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from

Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I

know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

>

> jo <jo.heartwork@ ...>

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PM

> Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable"

members here

>

> ï»¿

> Hopefully not :-)

>

> Jo

>

> -

> Peter VV

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

> Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable"

members here

>

> you think I could stop for a couple of days?

>

> Peter vv

>

> heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>

> @gro ups.com

> Thursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM

> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members

here

>

> LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat

> group :-)

>

> In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member,

there

> is a small core of posters.

>

> Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few

> days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine

> question) think that would encourage people to post?

>

> Jo

>

> @gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2@ >

wrote:

> >

> > Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't

want

> to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other

> then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually

> turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can

be

> intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not

> directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I

would

> be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

> >

> > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>

> > @gro ups.com

> > Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM

> > Re: Question about amt. of "viable"

members

> here

> >

> > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

> > anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it

> isn't vicious or likewise.

> > peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we

chat.

> we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you

> (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please

feel

> free.

> >

> > yarrow@

> > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM

> > @gro ups.com

> > Re: Question about amt. of "viable"

members

> here

> >

> > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:

> > >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's

been

> the

> > >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at

all

> > >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the

> posts

> > >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the

other

> > >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and

there

> > >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but

> since

> > >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many

> > >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really"

here,

> and

> > >why we aren't hearing from the others.

> >

> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those

> > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does

post,

> it

> > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the

> > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't

have

> > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out

some

> > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then

> once

> > in a while something interesting comes along.

> >

> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first

> > join, then never again.

> >

> > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the

> house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it

> out." - Bill Moyers

> >

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Not happy with your email address?

> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses

available now at

>

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

That's good, at least she had good food, and somewhere friendly to

stay. We went to the Black Forest area, and once to Bavaria, but

never found any vegan food. Maybe it will happen eventually.

Jo

, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 wrote:

>

> She had a great time. She was visiting friends from here that were

over there in the military. Her friend lives off post, but they were

aware she was vegan before having her out there, so they made sure

she had food. Just like you though, they had a hard time eating out.

She went to the black forest and ordered something in one of the

eateries and they told her there was no way to " veganize " anything.

They wouldn't even server salad with the meat on the side. Very

unopen to our lifestyle for being a tourist city!

>

> heartwerk <jo.heartwork

>

> Friday, June 27, 2008 1:53:54 AM

> Re: Question about amt. of " viable " members

here

>

> Hi

>

> Just butt in - really. It doesn't matter whether you are replying

to

> a post a week old, or brand new. As you will have noticed, I can't

> help but butt in!

>

> I live in England, but have visited Germany and it was pretty dire -

> even the vegetable soup apparently has bacon in it. Luckily we

were

> self-catering, but it would have been nice to eat out. Did your

> daughter have a good time, apart from the food?

>

> Jo

>

> @gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2@ >

wrote:

> >

> > I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the

> conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know

> how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything.

Do

> any of you live in Texas?

> > I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from

> Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all.

I

> know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

> >

> > jo <jo.heartwork@ ...>

> > @gro ups.com

> > Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PM

> > Re: Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

> members here

> >

> > ï»¿

> > Hopefully not :-)

> >

> > Jo

> >

> > -

> > Peter VV

> > @gro ups.com

> > Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

> > Re: Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

> members here

> >

> > you think I could stop for a couple of days?

> >

> > Peter vv

> >

> > ----- Original Message ----

> > heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>

> > @gro ups.com

> > Thursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM

> > Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

members

> here

> >

> > LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat

> > group :-)

> >

> > In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member,

> there

> > is a small core of posters.

> >

> > Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a

few

> > days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine

> > question) think that would encourage people to post?

> >

> > Jo

> >

> > @gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2@ >

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't

> want

> > to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone

other

> > then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually

> > turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that

can

> be

> > intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question

not

> > directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I

> would

> > be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather

> > >

> > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>

> > > @gro ups.com

> > > Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM

> > > Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

> members

> > here

> > >

> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...

> > > anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as

it

> > isn't vicious or likewise.

> > > peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we

> chat.

> > we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if

you

> > (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please

> feel

> > free.

> > >

> > > yarrow@

> > > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM

> > > @gro ups.com

> > > Re: Question about amt. of " viable "

> members

> > here

> > >

> > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:

> > > >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's

> been

> > the

> > > >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing

at

> all

> > > >wrong with that, & I " ve had plenty of interests in some of

the

> > posts

> > > >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the

> other

> > > >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and

> there

> > > >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk),

but

> > since

> > > >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how

many

> > > >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are " really "

> here,

> > and

> > > >why we aren't hearing from the others.

> > >

> > > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among

those

> > > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does

> post,

> > it

> > > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the

> > > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't

> have

> > > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out

> some

> > > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then

> > once

> > > in a while something interesting comes along.

> > >

> > > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they

first

> > > join, then never again.

> > >

> > > " We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets

the

> > house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it

> > out. " - Bill Moyers

> > >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Not happy with your email address?

> > Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses

> available now at

> >

>

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

left coast....oakland cal-i-for-ni-a

and, for my part, the couple times i've been over to europeland, i've found it very veg friendly

*shrug*

fraggle

Heather Farlow Jun 26, 2008 9:31 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do any of you live in Texas? I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

jo <jo.heartwork > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿

Hopefully not :-)

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

you think I could stop for a couple of days?

Peter vv

heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat group :-)In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member, there is a small core of posters.Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine question) think that would encourage people to post?Jo@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:>> Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather> > > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.> > > > > yarrow > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM > @gro ups.com > Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here > > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:> >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the> >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all> >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts> >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other> >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there> >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since> >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many> >members are in the bouncing list, and how many are "really" here, and> >why we aren't hearing from the others.> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once > in a while something interesting comes along.> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first > join, then never again.> > > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out." - Bill Moyers>

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

where in europe did u visit? we are wanting to go somewhere as soon as my husband graduates. Where would be a good place to go as half of our family is vegan?fraggle <EBbrewpunx Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:45:12 AMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

left coast....oakland cal-i-for-ni- a

and, for my part, the couple times i've been over to europeland, i've found it very veg friendly

*shrug*

fraggle

Heather Farlow Jun 26, 2008 9:31 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do any of you live in Texas? I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿

Hopefully not :-)

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

you think I could stop for a couple of days?

Peter vv

heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat group :-)In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member, there is a small core of posters.Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine question) think that would encourage people to post?Jo@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:>> Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a

question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather> > > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.> > >

> > yarrow > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM > @gro ups.com > Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here > > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:> >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the> >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all> >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts> >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other> >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there> >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since> >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many> >members are in the bouncing

list, and how many are "really" here, and> >why we aren't hearing from the others.> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once > in a while something interesting comes along.> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first > join, then never again.> > > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out." - Bill Moyers>

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

I'm under the impression that France may be the less vegan-friendly.If there is anybody from France here, please correct me if I'm wrong.It's good not to be always right :PCheers,Beatriz--- On Fri, 6/27/08, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 wrote:Heather Farlow <farjoy2Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 1:02 PM

where in europe did u visit? we are wanting to go somewhere as soon as my husband graduates. Where would be a good place to go as half of our family is vegan?fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, June 27, 2008 10:45:12 AMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

left coast....oakland cal-i-for-ni- a

and, for my part, the couple times i've been over to europeland, i've found it very veg friendly

*shrug*

fraggle

Heather Farlow Jun 26, 2008 9:31 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I don't think that would be good for anyone. Nobody to keep the conversation alive?I was just thinking that I personally don't know how to butt into a conversation. I still like reading everything. Do any of you live in Texas? I live in San Antonio. My daughter (age 15) just came back from Germany. (Stuttburg) and she said it wasn't vegan friendly at all. I know some of you live in Europe. Where is everyone?

jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, June 26, 2008 5:08:03 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿

Hopefully not :-)

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

you think I could stop for a couple of days?

Peter vv

heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 7:59:32 AM Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

LOL - that's probably because we like chatting - and it is a chat group :-)In the other groups I moderate, and those where I am a member, there is a small core of posters.Maybe if Fraggle, Peter, Peter VV and I stopped posting for a few days other people might converse. Does anyone (general genuine question) think that would encourage people to post?Jo@gro ups.com, Heather Farlow <farjoy2 > wrote:>> Sometimes it's not that the other people in this group don't want to post, its just that we don't know what to say. If someone other then the 4 main members of this group post something, it usually turns into a conversation between the 4 main people, and that can be intimidating. I think if someone posted a survey or a

question not directed at one person (which is how it is quite often) then I would be among the first to reply. Just my opinion--Heather> > > > fraggle <EBbrewpunx@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:00:33 PM> Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here> > > sorry you feel that way Yarrow...> anyone here is welcome to post anything they like, as long as it isn't vicious or likewise.> peter, peter vv, jo, and i have been here a long time. so, we chat. we bring up things that might interest anyone in the group. if you (or anyone) wants to talk about a subject, please please please feel free.> > >

> > yarrow > Jun 25, 2008 1:53 PM > @gro ups.com > Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here > > > At 8:10 PM +0000 6/25/08, qweiop75 wrote:> >....then I checked the archives back a year and saw that it's been the> >same three people posting most of the time. There's nothing at all> >wrong with that, & I"ve had plenty of interests in some of the posts> >from those three folks, but it just makes me wonder where the other> >1000+ people are. Okay, so I did see a post or two here and there> >from names that weren't PeterVV, fraggle or Jo (handwerk), but since> >the membership is closed to look at, I'm curious as to how many> >members are in the bouncing

list, and how many are "really" here, and> >why we aren't hearing from the others.> > Sometimes it *does* look like a private conversation among those > three (usually not about veg topics), so if anyone else does post, it > gets lost. Some days 50 or more messages get filtered into the > veg-chat box, and when the volume is that high, often I don't have > time to look at them. That's when I think I ought to weed out some > e-mail lists that appear to be more noise than signal. But then once > in a while something interesting comes along.> > I've noticed that some people post once or twice when they first > join, then never again.> > > "We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out." - Bill

Moyers>

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be?

Peter vv

jo <jo.heartwork Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Not happy with your email address?

Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

whenever the first person looked up at the stars and went "wow"

Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 3:33 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be?

Peter vv

jo <jo.heartwork > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

in what language?

Peter vv

fraggle <EBbrewpunx Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2008 8:49:31 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

whenever the first person looked up at the stars and went "wow"

Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 3:33 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be?

Peter vv

jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Not happy with your email address?

Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

HI Gaya

Stephen Moffat has written some really good ones - my favourite was'Blink'. If we get more of that sort of thing it should be really good. I watched Doctor Who from the beginning, but tailed off a bit at the end of Patrick Troughton, beginning of Jon Pertwee. I think my favourite story from the old series' was The Daemons.

Jo

-

Gayalondiel

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:50 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

From the old school, Always Tom Baker. Technically I'm young enough that McCoy was my Doctor but my parents showed us lots of re-runs. Baker always got the best storylines (he wins for "Genesis of the Daleks" alone). From the new doctors... it took me a very long time to get there, because I was very protective of my fandom, but this season I got to the point where Tennant was my doctor.* I'm very impressed with Stephen Moffat's episodes, and looking forward to him taking over the reigns next season. :DGaya*Incidentally, he's a fantastic actor, and hopefully come November he will be my Hamlet as well *squee*

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:25 PM, jo <jo.heartwork > wrote:

:-) Who is your favourite Doctor? I think my favourite is now David Tennant, as he seems to have mannerisms from all the previous Doctors - but I have liked them all.

Jo

-

Gayalondiel

Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:11 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

*not a pagan, but very much a Doctor Who fan*

On 6/26/08, Blue Rose <bluerose156 > wrote:

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork > wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156 AIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose-x.livejournal.com~Boston_GothicBoston_MysticBoston-Pagans

-- Ms Madeline J Andersont: 01242 861269m: 07881 623654e: maddy.anderson -- Ms Madeline J Andersont: 01242 861269m: 07881 623654e: maddy.anderson

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

I like him because he mixes little bits from the other Doctors into his character.

I have an acquaintance at work who is a Greek polytheist. It's quite a while since I thought about exactly what I am. I think eclectic is probably the right description.

Jo

-

Blue Rose

Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:28 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork > wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork > wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156 AIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose-x.livejournal.com~Boston_GothicBoston_MysticBoston-Pagans

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

ï»¿

Peter's your man for that answer - he has discussed with world experts, and might even be one himself.

Jo

-

Peter VV

Friday, June 27, 2008 8:33 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be?

Peter vv

jo <jo.heartwork > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

Posted June 27, 2008 · June 27, 2008

ï»¿

I reckon you are right there Fraggle.

Jo

-

fraggle

Friday, June 27, 2008 8:49 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

whenever the first person looked up at the stars and went "wow"

Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 3:33 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be?

Peter vv

jo <jo.heartwork > Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

ï»¿ Yes, people do believe in all the old gods.

Jo

-

Peter VV

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry.

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

I worship Greek gods.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote:

Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this?

Peter vv

Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee.

I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-)

What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good.

BBJo

-

Blue Rose

@gro ups.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM

Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here

Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote:

I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like?

-- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans

Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at

â€œWe now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.â€ - Bill Moyers

Question about amt. of viable members here

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Popular Days

Popular Days

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation