Guest guest Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 klingon, spell it right...and no, no its not i told you, i beleive its tcho tcho or else? you'll assume i don't exist? Peter VV Jun 28, 2008 1:15 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here is that clingon or some other "pretend" plaything? now cut it out and explain the origin of belief...........or else! Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> Sent: Saturday, 28 June, 2008 6:15:23 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here sorry, i beleive that is tcho tcho ok peter, let me make this easier for you, before yer head explodes http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ CthulhuIa! Ia! Cthulhu Fhtagn! Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtag! Peter VV Jun 28, 2008 8:46 AM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here You p****d again? speak English, or if you have to American.... .. Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, 27 June, 2008 10:20:00 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here cthulhu is all.... he is the beginning and the end...well, mostly the end... IA! IA! Cthulhu fhtagn! Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 5:08 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here and it? Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, 27 June, 2008 9:54:04 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here cthulhu..... . Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 4:33 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here and who created the spore of these fungi? Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, 27 June, 2008 9:28:16 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here ah peter peter... if you are x-tian or jewish, then that would have to be angels wouldn't it? angels were created before the universe, so they would have been the first i would gather in that respect if you believe in the garden of eden. tho, hoe much gazing they did is debatable. or dancing on the head of a pin.... but, the real answer is, the fungi from yuggoth...they were the first sentient beings here to stare up at the stars, them and the mi go... (look it up...) Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 4:18 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here and before the garden of eden?, any sentient life forms looking into the firmament in awe? Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, 27 June, 2008 9:07:04 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "religious" members here some long long dead one.... depends on when humankind and its antecedents become "aware" enough to go "wow" and of course it all depends on yer religious beliefs...if yer x-tian then the obvious answer is 6000 yrs ago in the garden of eden.... Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 3:57 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here in what language? Peter vv fraggle <EBbrewpunx@earthlin k.net>@gro ups.comFriday, 27 June, 2008 8:49:31 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here whenever the first person looked up at the stars and went "wow" Peter VV Jun 27, 2008 3:33 PM @gro ups.com Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Is it possible to put an age on a faith ( you said old gods ), I wonder what the oldest faith would be? Peter vv jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 11:15:44 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here  Yes, people do believe in all the old gods. Jo - Peter VV @gro ups.com Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:17 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Realy? worship as in believe they exist sort of thing? wow, does anyone believe on Roman gods still? are they two sides of the same coin, dont wish to offend, I realy am ignorant, sorry. Peter vv Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 10:12:20 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here I worship Greek gods. On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Peter VV <swpgh01 (AT) talk21 (DOT) com> wrote: Boy am I ignorant, I dont understand any of this? Peter vv Blue Rose <bluerose156@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comThursday, 26 June, 2008 9:28:08 PMRe: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Not all, but working on it! The current one is my favorite. He is quite squee. I'm a Greek polytheist. I'd describe myself more as either syncretic or "intelligently eclectic". I don't really mix 'n' match, just fill holes. On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:20 PM, jo <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote: Oooooh! I feel some chat coming on :-) What path are you (I'm eclectic and Druid (but not wholly)) and have you seen all the old Doctors? or did you come in on the newer ones? We have just two episodes left this year :-( but they look as though they should be good. BBJo - Blue Rose @gro ups.com Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:16 PM Re: Re: Question about amt. of "viable" members here Yay!<-- also a Pagan and Doctor Who fan. :D On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, heartwerk <jo.heartwork@ gmail.com> wrote: I personally like heavy metal, Doctor Who, Paganism and theparanormal, photography, gardening, gentle walks etc.What do you like? -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at -- Email: bluerose156@ gmail.comAIM: A Blue Rose 156 YM: blue_rose_156http://x-bluerose- x.livejournal. com~http://groups. / group/Boston_ Gothichttp://groups. / group/Boston_ Mystichttp://groups. / group/Boston- Pagans Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Not happy with your email address? Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at “We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.