CALL to Action: Reject U.S. Government Proposal to Shoot Horses

[Guest guest]

Friends of Animals Jul 24, 2008 8:18 AM EBbrewpunx CALL to Action: Reject U.S. Government Proposal to Shoot Horses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visit our Website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CALL to Action: Reject U.S. Government Proposal to Shoot Horses

 

view comments | add yours

 

Following the latest obnoxious proposal this month from the U.S. government to kill thousands of horses, the international animal advocacy organization Friends of Animals again calls for a full moratorium on the government-sanctioned round-ups, sales and slaughter of free-living horses.1

 

See the video

The federal Bureau of Land Management set out in helicopters and harassed and chased roughly half the western herd of mustangs — a group numbering 30,000 — into a corral. And now, the officials are proposing to start killing them.

Environmentalists, The New York Times tells us, will go along with this violence because they see the mustangs as “top-of-the-food-chain bullies whose hooves and teeth disturb the habitats of endangered tortoises and desert birds.â€2

We at Friends of Animals are also environmentalists. We aren’t calling these horses “icons†or “part of the imagery†of the west. We are calling for respect, and our government should deliver.

 

 

If horses are at the top of the so-called food chain, it’s our government’s fault. Where are the carnivore animals? We could put the blame for their absence squarely at the feet of the U.S. government and its predator-control schemes.

Conflict of Interest?The Bureau of Land Management is charged with protecting wild horses and burros on the western rangelands. Yet it routinely rounds them up and passes them to private ownership. The bureau is poised to shoot several thousand of them (it plans to decide on the matter after a Congressional audit that’s due to be completed in September). To justify this proposal, officials are complaining about expenses. Yet the bureau allows ranchers to enjoy leases to the rangelands for a pittance. Ranchers who claim mustang “overpopulation†degrades the environment. Balderdash.

At the beginning of the 20th century, there were about 2 million mustangs in the wilderness.3 Today, there’s a total of 60,000 (if that many). This community of horses is degrading the environment, but the owners of 3 million cattle are not?

“We must stop supporting the profits of ranches,†said Friends of Animals president Priscilla Feral. “For those who respect free-living animals, it’s simply not enough to express outrage at the proposed shooting of horses. We need to end the cycle of violence. It’s high time we acknowledge the connection between horsemeat and hamburgers.â€

Just two years ago, the Bureau of Land Management relaxed the rules and regulations governing ranchers on public land, cutting back on conservation provisions, and allowing ranchers significantly more control. The opposite pressure should be occurring. Ranchers do not merit the support of the government while they siphon land and resources and push free animals to the brink of extinction — and then blame horses for the mess.

Then we have Jay Kirkpatrick, an experimenter who directs the Science and Conservation Center in Billings, Montana, quoted in The New York Times as saying insufficient weight is being given to birth control for horses. But animals in nature don’t need to be controlled by a species that has such difficulty in controlling itself.

For three decades, the Bureau of Land Management has backed costly experiments with contraception as a way to continue aggressive management practices. Jay Kirkpatrick, together with the Humane Society of the United States, have promoted the invasive and disturbing tests of hormones and the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida, or PZP, in free-roaming horses.

Terms like “overabundant†and “overpopulation†are liberally applied wherever free-living animals are deemed inconvenient. The underlying message is that, if not controlled, free-living animals will take over. This both reflects and supports the systematic acceptance of control, and treats all of nature as a zoo.

Recommendations for Action from Friends of Animals:Go to the root. This is a question of who gets the land: free-living animals, or cattle ranchers. The key step each of us can take in support of horses is to adopt a plant-based diet.

Oppose the BLM’s proposal. If you’ve seen more than enough debates about whether the land can support horses and burros while all along the government supports the real environmental threat — animal agribusiness — tell the BLM now, using the link you see here. Or call the BLM toll-free: 1-800-710-7597. Let them know these mustangs should never have been corralled in the first place. Let the horses go, and let them be. Allow them the dignity of freedom.

Then find your representative in Congress, ring them up at 202.224.3121, and explain that real environmental awareness means questioning the influence of corporate profit-seekers over laws and agencies. Say “no†to horse-killing. And tell them you oppose roundups too.

Support Friends of Animals’ new radio and television announcements. We’re buying 30-second and one-minute announcement spots, asking the public to call the BLM and oppose the horse-killing proposal. You can sustain our public announcement throughout the audit period leading up to the BLM’s decision. Let’s make the most of the window of time these horses have. Invest in our public education effort; donate here.

Thank you for teaching respect for the autonomous animals of our Earth. Thank you for telling our government no to killing horses.

NOTES

[1] We have previously called for a repeal of the (2005) Burns Amendment, which reversed a 34-year prohibition on the slaughter of wild horses by enabling the BLM to sell off horses over 10 years of age.

[2] Felicity Barringer, “On Mustang Range, a Battle on Thinning the Herd†- New York Times (20 Jul. 2008).

[3] Deanne Stillman, “Wild Horses Aren’t Free†- Los Angeles Times (2 Jun. 2008).Friends of Animals, founded in 1957, advocates for the right of animals to live free according to their own terms.

-->

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOME

PROGRAMS

NEWS

ACT'IONLINE

STORE

ABOUT

SPAY/NEUTER

CERTIFICATES

SUPPORT

 

NEW ECO Tote Bag

 

 

Made from 100% recycled cotton scraps-manufactured fair-trade and fair-labor.

 

 

 

Friends of Animals’ goal is to free animals from cruelty and institutionalized exploitation around the world.

 

 

 

Friends of Animals 777 Post Road Darien CT 06820 203-656-1522

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This message was sent from Friends of Animals to EBbrewpunx. It was sent from: Friends of Animals, 777 Post Road Ste 205, Darien, CT 06820. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below.

 

 

 

 

Manage your subscription

 

View this message in the iContact Community: View message Comment on this message Receive as RSS

 

Share this message with others: del.icio.us Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon

 

With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.

[Guest guest]

I just had a disturbing conversation in my class about a similar

topic. Some of my classmates were trying to tell me a story involving

squirrels and pellet guns. I asked them politely to save any stories

involving hunting for when I was not in the room because I just do not

need to hear this type of thing over and over in school. One of the

girls (a vegetarian because she wants to be thin) insisted that

hunting was natural and helped with population health of animals.

Statements like that are wrong on so many levels, my head nearly

explodes with contradiction. " Yes, " I told her, " it's a good thing

humans came along with their guns! What on earth did nature do before

there were naked beach apes with metal weapons to control all the

animal populations? " If we were truly trying to help restore some

sort of balance, couldn't we return predators to the ecosystem, and

wouldn't we be picking off only the weak and unhealthy members of the

herd, as a natural predator would? Humans are overpopulated, should

we go around hunting people? Gah!

Deep breathing. Sigh.

[Guest guest]

be vewwy vewwy quiet..i'm hunting people

huhuhuhuhuhuhuh

i'll catch that wascally CEO yet...

Faith Jul 25, 2008 10:00 AM Re: CALL to Action: Reject U.S. Government Proposal to Shoot Horses

 

 

 

I just had a disturbing conversation in my class about a similartopic. Some of my classmates were trying to tell me a story involvingsquirrels and pellet guns. I asked them politely to save any storiesinvolving hunting for when I was not in the room because I just do notneed to hear this type of thing over and over in school. One of thegirls (a vegetarian because she wants to be thin) insisted thathunting was natural and helped with population health of animals. Statements like that are wrong on so many levels, my head nearlyexplodes with contradiction. "Yes," I told her, "it's a good thinghumans came along with their guns! What on earth did nature do beforethere were naked beach apes with metal weapons to control all theanimal populations?" If we were truly trying to help restore somesort of balance, couldn't we return predators to the ecosystem, andwouldn't we be picking off only the weak and unhealthy members of theherd, as a natural predator would? Humans are overpopulated, shouldwe go around hunting people? Gah! Deep breathing. Sigh.

 

 

 

 

With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.