how did our oil get under your pine trees?

[Guest guest]

The trouble with tar sands

 

If you enjoy Science Matters, please consider making a donation.

 

If you want to be scared, you don’t need to watch a horror movie or

read the latest Stephen King bestseller.

 

Real terror can be found by simply firing up Google Earth, the

computer program that allows users to look at satellite pictures of

any place on the planet. By mousing over and zooming in, you can see

what Alberta’s tar sands look like from space.

 

It is not a pretty sight. In fact, it’s scary – and for good reason.

 

A recent book by celebrated journalist Andrew Nikiforuk, Tar Sands:

Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent (published by Greystone Books

and the David Suzuki Foundation), explores what these grey spots on

Google Earth mean to Canada’s environment and economy. It’s an

important book, one that every Canadian should read to find out how

the world’s largest energy project will affect us.

 

The scale of the Alberta tar sands project is unprecedented in

Canadian history. Alberta’s " blue-eyed sheiks " , as the oil-industry

elite are known, stand to make billions of dollars from carving up

northern Alberta in order to meet U.S. demand for oil. But these

dollars pale in comparison to the environmental value that is being

squandered at the expense of petrodollars.

 

The main tar sands deposits are at three sites in Alberta: Peace

River, Cold Lake, and Athabasca. The Athabasca region contains the

largest deposit of crude bitumen in the world.

 

All of this bitumen, a complex mixture of molecules from prehistoric

life, is a geological miracle with which Canada has been blessed. This

bitumen could turn out to be a substance that will help our children

and grandchildren in ways that we can’t even imagine today, much the

same way our ancestors couldn’t have imagined us using silicon in our

computer chips. But instead of safeguarding this resource, we are

using it up. And we are creating an environmental catastrophe that

will take centuries to recover from…if we recover at all.

 

The tar sands consist of a mixture of silica sand, minerals, clay,

water, and most importantly, crude bitumen. The process of converting

bitumen so that we can use it to power our cars, heat our homes, and

transport our food is not easy.

 

It’s estimated that two tonnes of earth must be excavated to produce

one barrel of thick tar-like bitumen. And it requires as much as three

barrels of fresh water from the Athabasca River to make one barrel of

bitumen. It also takes a huge amount of energy to extract the oil from

the sands.

 

Now think about this: each day Canada exports one million barrels of

bitumen to the United States.

 

In the media, we hear that tar sands will provide oil companies with

tremendous profits in the future, but there’s been very little

discussion about what happens next. Even hardened energy experts agree

that relying on oil-soaked sand to meet North America’s energy needs

means that we’re nearing the end of the cheap-oil era.

 

We know that our lifestyles must change. We know that burning fossil

fuels such as oil and gas creates smog that harms our health and

creates global warming. We know that global warming poses an

incredible threat to humanity.

 

We also know that there are solutions, such as creating a future based

on renewable sources, increasing conservation efforts, and rethinking

society so that we protect our quality of life without destroying the

planet in the process.

 

With all the money being made from the tar sands, very little of it

seems to be reinvested in renewable energy that comes from wind,

solar, biomass, and geothermal sources. If anything, we could be

investing this money in low-carbon projects so that we won’t have to

pull every bit of bitumen from the ground.

 

When my children were younger, they’d often ask me about the bogeyman

– a mythical evil spirit who’d lie in wait under their beds when the

lights went out. But maybe the bogeyman isn’t some scary creature.

Maybe the bogeyman is simply a man in a suit trying to satisfy his

shareholders, make a profit, and cosy up to federal politicians so he

can continue doing his work without having to answer to his

environmental crimes.

 

Or maybe there’s something more frightening to consider. Perhaps the

bogeyman is us – the public that places the short-term economic value

of the tar sands above the priceless value of our environment and our

health.

 

 

Take David Suzuki's Nature Challenge and learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

 

 

 

 

 

“We now know that a neo-conservative is an arsonist who sets the house on fire

and six years later boasts that no one can put it out.†- Bill Moyers