Weight Loss Hype: Why Counting Calories Never Works - try vegetarianism instead for an easy and effective way

[Guest guest]

The Weight Loss Hype: Why Counting Calories Never Works -

try vegetarianism instead for an easy and effective way

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kathy-freston/the-weight-loss-hype-why_b_178873.html

 

Kathy Freston

 

 

We've known for more than a decade that the key to weight-loss is

to

consume fewer calories than you're burning--in other words, eat

less,

exercise more, or both. That dietary adage was confirmed last week

by

researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health, with a

widely

reported study in the /New England Journal of Medicine/.

 

In the study, researchers put 811 overweight adults on one of four

weight loss plans, which were supposed to vary widely in fat,

protein,

and carbohydrate content. Most of the reporting discussed

Atkins-style

high protein diets as similar to the diet's high protein plan and

Ornish-style low fat vegetarian diets as similar to the study's low

fat

plan. Since everyone who cut out 750 calories per day from their

diets

lost basically the same amount of weight, the take home message

seemed

to be that none of the popular diets are any better than any of the

others.

 

But upon closer analysis, a very different conclusion emerges.

 

First, all the tested diets strived to be " heart healthy, "

which means

that they limited saturated fat, limited cholesterol, and contained

at

least 20 daily grams of fiber (in the form of whole grains, fruits,

and

vegetables). Anyone with even a passing familiarity with

Atkins-style

diets knows that all three of these requirements are virtually

impossible on such diets--so this study should not be read, in any

way,

as endorsing an Atkins (or similar high-meat) diet for weight

loss.

 

Second, although the caloric restriction worked for everyone who

stuck

with it--so it certainly is confirmation that caloric restriction is

the

way to lose weight--participants at two years were already

consuming

more than the allowed calories and gaining back weight. In fact,

all

four groups were on track to be right where they started by year

three.

In other words, for long term weight loss, all of the diets

failed.

 

The reason for the high failure rate seems obvious to me: All four

diets

used similar foods and required precise caloric accounting, so all

four

diets were confusing and very hard to follow. Basically, adherents

were

asked to be absurdly careful with caloric counts (dropping precisely

750

calories per day) and proportions, but were told to eat identical

foods--just in different amounts. So far, diets that require

rigorous

participant logs and calorie counting have always failed in peer

reviewed studies, so this shouldn't have come as a big surprise.

 

In fact, there is a diet that works--consistently--at helping

adherents

to lose weight and keep it off, and which has a very high

compliance

rate: a very low fat, vegetarian diet, as recommended by Dr. Dean

Ornish, Dr. John McDougall, Dr. Neal Barnard, and many others.

 

The very-low-fat vegetarian diets work long-term because they focus

on

the consumption of fiber and complex carbohydrates, which make you

feel

full without a lot of empty fat calories, so adherents needn't keep

food

logs, restrict food intake, or count calories--in other words, they

take

advantage of the nature of food.

 

The Harvard study got off to a good start by requiring (in all

four

groups) 20 grams of fiber per day and by limiting fat and

cholesterol,

but the reason all four groups failed in the end is that all four

diets

included meat, which has no fiber at all, and which is packed with

fat,

relative to whole grains, beans, fruits and vegetables.

 

As explained by Dr. Ornish in the 2001 foreword to Eat More, Weigh

Less,

which is the Bible of this way of eating: " When you go from a

high fat

to a low fat diet, even if you eat the same amount of food, you

consume

fewer calories without feeling hungry and deprived. Also, because

the

food is high in fiber, you get full before you consume too

many

calories. You can eat whenever you're hungry and still lose

weight. "

 

Interestingly, in their review of all the past studies that have

been

done on diet and weight loss, the researchers note that " a

very-high-carbohydrate, very-low-fat vegetarian diet was superior

[for

weight loss] to a conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat

[non-vegetarian] diet. " But for some reason, they don't include

this

diet, which has been proven to work, in their study.

 

In addition to the fact that Ornish-style vegetarian diets are easy

to

follow and work naturally for weight loss without calorie counting

and

food logs, adherence to the diet is high because results come fast

and

furious, and they include so much more than weight loss, from

improved

sexual function and greater energy to unclogged arteries and less

need

for sleep.

 

And while it might seem challenging at first, it's actually quite

basic--you eat all the grains, beans, fruits, and vegetables you

want--from black bean burritos to three bean salads to pasta with

(faux)

meatballs to spaghetti squash and collard greens to apples and

blueberries (basically, if it's a whole grain, bean, fruit or

vegetable,

you can eat as much of it as you want).

 

And we've known about this miracle diet for more than a decade.

 

***

 

/Freston is a health and wellness expert and a New York Times

best-selling author. Her books include Quantum Wellness: A Practical

and

Spiritual Guide to Health and Happiness, The One: Discovering the

Secrets of Soul Mate Love and Expect a Miracle: 7 Spiritual Steps

to

Finding the Right Relationship. Her new book, The Quantum Wellness

Cleanse: A 21 Day Essential Guide to Healing Your Body, Mind and

Spirit,

will be published by Weinstein Books in May 2009.

 

/The Weight Loss Hype: Why Counting Calories Never Works