Audrey- More...how about veg friendly make up

[Guest guest]

As far as I know, " cruelty-free " isn't a trademarked phrase. If Leaping

Bunny has any association with PETA, this is the first I'm hearing of

it. I can't look into it more right now, but this sound like they're

not: http://www.leapingbunny.org/about.php. So does this:

http://www.livingcrueltyfree.com/2009/04/07/dear-emily-difference-leaping-bunny-\

petas-caring-consumer/

, but I'm not sure whose blog it is. If you find out differently, I'd be

curious to learn.

 

Peace,

Mo

Audrey Snyder wrote:

> Isn't the phrase " cruelty free " a PETA-owned name? " Not tested on animals "

> or " No animal testing " is usually what is on the product itself. For

> example, some Clairol products (Herbal Essences) say " Not tested on animals "

> -- which actually means that that particular product is not, but Clairol's

> parent company DOES engage in animal testing. The " cruelty free " phrase with

> PETA's little bunny is a trademark, I believe, and can only be used if the

> company (not just the individual product) is approved by PETA.

>

> Audrey

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Very interesting. Thanks, Mo.

 

Audrey

 

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Maureen <ailanthus wrote:

 

>

>

> As far as I know, " cruelty-free " isn't a trademarked phrase. If Leaping

> Bunny has any association with PETA, this is the first I'm hearing of

> it. I can't look into it more right now, but this sound like they're

> not: http://www.leapingbunny.org/about.php. So does this:

>

>

http://www.livingcrueltyfree.com/2009/04/07/dear-emily-difference-leaping-bunny-\

petas-caring-consumer/

> , but I'm not sure whose blog it is. If you find out differently, I'd be

> curious to learn.

>

> Peace,

> Mo

>

>

>