Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RAMANA MAHARSHI'S SONG CELESTIAL / 24 / upadesa

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

, " upadesa " <maunna wrote:

>

> " yosyx " <yosyflug@> wrote:

> >

> > :) dear mouna, allow to correct your " incomplete

> > understanding " . see, the apparent transformation

> > of " our " actions etc is akin to cutting off and

> > withering of the illusory tree of ahamkara, the 'ego';

> > the sense of doership. but jnana cuts directly at the

> > very root of the tree, which never exists in the first

> > place... " the true always is, the untrue never has

> > existence " (ch.2). like sun dispersing the morning

> > mists, the knowledge exposes the reality of non-existence

> > of 'my'self (ego) and thus obviously of any activity

> > whatsoever... in spite of apprent activities and engagements

> > of the senses and their objects etc, the all-containing, ever

> > whole and unaffected boundless truth/self/god is all that is,

> > was, and ever will be. regardless of appearances, all is

> > perfect always, and just as it should be.

> >

> > there is no doer,

> > no " you " nor " me " .

> > in truth - all is " s/he " !

> >

>

> Dear Yosy, greetings!!

>

> First of all, don't take personally the words " incomplete

> understanding " . They were pointing to something else than Yosy's

whole

> understanding that proved to be quite deep in your poems.

 

 

 

 

:) thank you, my dear friend. and of course i do not

take it personally. (and neither do you. as we know,

" personal " understanding is always incomplete...)

 

 

 

 

 

>

> That being said, I can't but agree 100% (or even 200% if that

existed)

> with what you have said.

> My only commentary would be that your statement is coming from the

> Absolute perspective. At that level, there is not even an " all " that

> could be either a " he " , a " she " or even an " it " ...

 

 

 

 

well, i can spend only what i have in my pourse,

as the sufis say....

 

 

 

 

 

> Actions are perceived and performed at the Transactional/Relative

> level, and from that level they are judged into Dharmic or Adharmic.

> That is relative Teaching of the Gita, that's why Krishna wakes up

> Arjuna and tells him: Take up your bow and fight!

 

 

 

:) a man has to do what a man has to do!

 

 

 

 

> The transactional/relative level is apparent, but nonetheless is the

> one " we " are " in " communicating by email, " you " Yosy and " me " Mouna.

> Within this level, adharmic actions are the ones that are performed

> from the Ego standpoint (sense of doership + desires based on

> unfulfillment), dharmic ones are the ones performed from the Natural

> State, meaning in accordance with the Substance of the Absolute.

>

 

 

 

right 100%, my friend. (hehehe of course. " we " are the some

'one' anyway, theire is no " other " ...)

 

 

 

> I think we are saying the same thing, only that I include the

relative

> level to study actions in general.

>

 

 

yes. and i honor it greatly.

 

 

 

> Yours in Bhagavan,

> Mouna

>

 

 

thank you, dear friend. and i really enjoy and

appreciate your presence.

 

yosy (friend of friends)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" yosyx " <yosyflug wrote:

>

 

> yosy (friend of friends)

>

 

Good interaction, thank you!

By the way, is there a meaning to your name, Yosy?

I had/ve a friend, japanese lady called Yoshy.

(I'll be grateful if you answer about your name with a poem!!)

 

Anyhow, all the best,

 

Yours in Bhagavan,

Mouna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " upadesa " <maunna wrote:

>

> " yosyx " <yosyflug@> wrote:

> >

>

> > yosy (friend of friends)

> >

>

> Good interaction, thank you!

> By the way, is there a meaning to your name, Yosy?

> I had/ve a friend, japanese lady called Yoshy.

> (I'll be grateful if you answer about your name with a poem!!)

>

> Anyhow, all the best,

>

> Yours in Bhagavan,

> Mouna

>

 

 

 

:) " yosy " is a diminutive form of " yosef " , the

hebrew name known as " joseph " . 'yosef' means

" he who shall add/increase " . the diminutive

'yosy' has no meaning. even though my given

birth name is yosef, i appear as yosy in all

oficial and formal documents (passport, id,

driving licence etc).

 

my apology, but as yet no poem on 'yosy' decided

to came through...

 

regards to your lady friend. tell her it is a

good name, very popular and common here.

 

best regards,

 

_()_

yosy

 

 

ps. :) some upadesa we are getting, huh? jai bhagavan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...