Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

To Soul / james & all

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

, " James Traverse "

<nisarga111 wrote:

>

> Hi Sundar,

>

> Re your question: 'Does 'returning attention to the Self' mean

having

> a 'no thought' state?'

>

> First I'd like to point out that in an earlier message (Message

> #47225) Soul wrote to Mourad about the use of the words 'return' and

> 'remain' and quoted Ramana from 'Conscious Immortality' where he

used

> these words while speaking to particular devotees.

>

> In this light 'returning attention to the self' is a direction

Ramana

> gave to particular devotees at a certain time - at that time these

> words were appropriate and in a similar situation these words may or

> may not be appropriate.

>

> I feel that the fact that Ramana spoke these words gives them an

> energy that comes from the way of being that he represented in such

a

> way that the 'you' who is being directed to 'return attention to the

> Self' falls away.

>

> In the absence of the 'you' just mentioned there is Presence as your

> true nature.

>

> ~ ~ ~

>

> Know Thyself.

>

> This is the direction that every sage in some form or another has

given.

>

> A response to this might be, 'Who is this 'Thy' that is being

directed

> to 'Know Thyself'?

>

> Another response is, 'To Know Thyself is to be Aware'.

>

> And still another response is to actually 'live' the direction by

> asking 'Who am I?' such that there is the realization that this

> question cannot be answered intellectually and that there is

a 'living

> answer' that is not of the measure of the mind... A way that that

> living answer may be expressed is:

>

> 'I am formless Awareness functioning in form.'

 

 

 

 

 

hehehehe i am not...

 

 

 

>

> In this light the answer to your question, 'Does 'returning

attention

> to the Self' mean having a 'no thought' state?' is that what these

> words are pointing to is not a 'state', rather they point to your

true

> nature where thinking as functioning can arise yet this 'form' of

> thinking is the action of your true nature called 'insight'.

>

> Love,

> James

>

>

 

 

" the true always is, the untrue never has existence "

(the bhagwadgita)

 

 

 

 

 

Mind may crawl

Mind may aspire

Mind may renounce

And mind may desire.

 

Mind may be seeing

And mind may be blind

Mind can be seeking,

And mind can find. . .

 

Mind plays it's games.

 

But

I

Don't

Mind!

 

 

 

 

 

 

ahamkara, " ego " is an illusory self/mind

superimposition on the inexplicable, boundless,

timeless and all-perviding god/self/love/truth/void/etc,

the one impersonal reality which alone is/is not.

 

 

BOOM!

 

yosy

 

 

 

, " Sundararajan " <sundar22ca@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Vanakkam Anbudan (or more correctly Vanakkam Anbu. Since anbudan

would

> > mean WITH anbu),

> >

> > I agree with 'no thought -> no mind'.

> > But, how does this relate to 'returning attention to the Self'?

> >

> > Does 'returning attention to the Self' mean having a 'no thought'

state?

> > sundar

> >

> > , mango tree <oldmangotree@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > vanakkam sundar-ji,

> > >  

> > > when there is a thought, the mind exists....

> > >  

> > > no thought, no mind...

> > >

> > > Shambo Arunachaleshwara

> > >  

> > > anbudan

> > >  

> > >

 

 

 

indeed

 

 

 

> > > TAT TVAM ASI ...

> > >

> > > --- On Thu, 11/27/08, Sundararajan <sundar22ca@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sundararajan <sundar22ca@>

> > > Re: To Soul

> > >

> > > Thursday, November 27, 2008, 10:01 AM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Soul,

> > > " Return the attention to the Self, our true nature and identify

with

> > > this,rather than identifying with thought,emotions, body, mind

as who

> > > we are. "

> > >

> > > It appears that the suggestion (returning the attention to the

Self)

> > > is made to the 'mind'. At the same time, it is also asked not to

> > > identify with the 'mind'. Can the mind avoid identifying with

itself?

> > >

> > > Looks like the only way is to enquire who the 'i' is and

arriving at a

> > > check mate.

> > >

> > > Would you agree?

> > > sundar

> > >

> > > , " souleternalbeing "

> > > <souleternalbeing@ ...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Mourad,

> > > >

> > > > On using the word " remain " or " return " .....

> > > >

> > > > I think we can pick on words or not.... One could pick apart

the

> > > > words of Sri Ramana, or any sage or not.

> > > >

> > > > I thought, from memory, Sri Ramana had used the

word " return " ..so

> > > > looked and found, from 'Conscious Immortality' p.66...to a

> > > > devoteee, " We all have to return to our source " ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ramana also uses the word " remain " , from the same book p.168,

to a

> > > > devotee, " You are now advised to give up all these false

ideas, and

> > > > to trace your source and remain as the Self. In that state

there

> are

> > > > no differences and no questions will arise " .

> > > >

> > > > I have also have read and heard .. " point your attention

> > > > towards " , " turn your attention towards " , and " focus on the

Self " ....

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > It is understood here that our true nature, Self, does not

come or

> > > > go, our true nature is always here, always was...so in this

sense

> > > > there is no 'return'as such, but there's no problem here with

this

> > > > word ,as it is understood what it is pointing to. Return the

> > > > attention to the Self, our true nature and identify with

> this,rather

> > > > than identifying with thought,emotions, body, mind as who we

are.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Blessings,

> > > >

> > > > Soul

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " mourad "

<mourad_shamel@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hello Soul

> > > > >

> > > > > I was following your conversation with Michael.

> > > > >

> > > > > What you said is totally true, the mind stops following the

old

> > > > > patterns of thinking that it was used to follow before,

whenever

> > > > > facing the objective world. You do not reurn to the Self,

you

> remain

> > > > > immersed in the Self; whether you are facing the objective

> world or

> > > > not.

> > > > >

> > > > > In otherwords, any contact with objective world does not

> re-create

> > > > you

> > > > > as an ego with its own world.

> > > > >

> > > > > mourad

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...