Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Arto

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Sorry for misspelling your name Arto.

 

Namaste and love

Harsha

 

, " harshaimtm " wrote:

>

> Wonderful conversation. Welcome to the sangha orto. The force of the

> guru works through the collective wisdom of the sangha. Sri Ramana

> used to say that if one has found the right company of good souls that

> helps to ripen the mind. Thanks Alan, orto, Jeff, Ram, Mouna, Joyce,

> Jill, Tony, Peter, James, for sharing your wonderful insights.

>

> Also, thank you Era, Tony, Joyce, Jill, Jerry, and so many others for

> the good wishes sent for the 10th anniversary of HS.

>

> We have all been together a long time. The warmth of your friendship

> and love is comforting.

>

> Namaste and love to all

> Harsha

>

> easy-and-natural-is-the-way-by-dr-harsh-k-luthar

>

>

>

> , Alan Jacobs

> <alanadamsjacobs@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Arto,

> >  

> > I like your analogy- it is quite original and effective. I feel you

> have come to the correct conclusion. Your destiny will not be impeded.

> Iswara preordains each life for each individual for his spiritual

> development until Realisation when destiny in this sense ends. This

> answer was given to Brunton by the Maharshi and is recorded in their

> dialogues in a book called Conscious Immortality. If you are meant to

> have an external Guru you will be given one, meanwhile you have an

> inner Guru deep in your Heart who will guide you.

> >  

> > All best wishes, blessings and warm regards,

> >  

> > Alan

> >

> > --- On Mon, 5/1/09, arto <iamarto@> wrote:

> >

> > arto <iamarto@>

> > Re: Is a Living Guru

> necessary? from Barry

> >

> > Monday, 5 January, 2009, 4:10 PM

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Alan,

> >

> > Please correspond as much as you can :)

> >

> > Well, what I mean of " free will " there is the relative one. I know

> > that free will is only *apparent* and not real. I only meant that if

> > before asking for the Master I had imagined several possibilities of

> > how to spend my life, there would remain only one possibility

> > afterwards (to my own relative perspective/ will) and I had to stick

> > to that possibility because it's the best.

> >

> > However, yes from the absolute Consciousness perspective there is no

> > free will and the Maharshi's quote for it is as follows:

> >

> > There is neither creation nor destruction, Neither destiny nor free

> > will, Neither path nor achievement. -- Maharshi

> >

> > Recently this free-will issue has been an issue of contemplation, and

> > I've imagined it in the form of a billiard/snooker (pool) game. Let's

> > say that there's a peace of plastic made in the form of " C " that

> > contains a bunch of balls on the billiard table, and every bunch of

> > balls in " C " represents the thoughts/beliefs of an individual. The

> > free-will thought is represented as the white ball outside of the

> > plastic " C " , and although the inner thoughts and beliefs could be

> > bombarded with the free will thought (white ball) from outside

> > the " C " , no balls could escape the " C " shaped plastic. And this is a

> > rule that we set at will, assuming that individual

> > intelligence/ knowledge is constantly limited as far as it is Ego-

> > attached.

> >

> > This free-will thought (white ball) is a very dangerous ball, because

> > the individual might fall into the trap that he could escape his

> > predetermined destiny by bombarding his own thoughts (balls in " C "

> > shape) with the free-will thought and the outcome is suicide as an

> > attempt to " outsmart God " .

> >

> > So why is this thought-trap ignorance? Because no matter how (in

> > which way/direction/ power) the white ball bombards the other

balls in

> > the " C " shape, all the probabilities of how the balls will interact

> > to resolve an outcome will be limited by the boundaries physical

> > dimensions and qualities of the " C " shape (limited by Ego's Capacity)

> > and all the probabilities are pre-calculated by the Self which is

> > aware of all possibilities, and aware of the final possibility that

> > the individual will conclude.

> >

> > :) Final conclusion? No free-will, and any attachment to thought

> > processes, beliefs or concepts is a prison so vast to be easily

> > recognized. Then you can easily compare an unenlightened/ unRealised

> > human being to the Chessmaster software engine running on a computer.

> >

> > arto

> >

> > , Alan Jacobs

> > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Arto,

> > >  

> > > Forgive me in intervening in your correspondence with Barry. You

> > say 'there's no more free will'. But the so called free will weÂ

> >  imagine we have is only apparant, and is part of the structureÂ

> >  inbuilt in the predetermination .There are quotes from

> Bhagavan to

> > back this up. Free Will is a vexatious question,.We are advised to

> > look for the source of he who thinks he has or has not free will.

> > That is Self Enquiry.

> > >  

> > > All best wishes and regards,

> > >  

> > > Alan

> > >

> > > --- On Mon, 5/1/09, arto <iamarto@ > wrote:

> > >

> > > arto <iamarto@ >

> > > Re: Is a Living Guru

> > necessary? from Barry

> > >

> > > Monday, 5 January, 2009, 10:50 AM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Barry,

> > >

> > > I believe this is a very common question, and I am personally

> > asking

> > > the same one to myself always up-till now.

> > >

> > > Yet, I have some thoughts and beliefs that could help in

> > > determination.

> > >

> > > One of the thoughts that had an impact on me was an answer to this

> > > question from a corresponding friend. He told me that I can

> > sincerely

> > > ask the universe for a living Master, and if the request is

> > earnest,

> > > the time is ripe enough, and you are persistent, the desire will be

> > > granted and a Master will appear in your life.

> > >

> > > But then there is something to ponder.. once the living Master

> > > appears in your life, there's no more free-will. The grace of the

> > > Master as a gift from heaven has to be accepted by the requestor

> > > along with the pre-determined path of perfection. When you meet the

> > > Master you cannot escape the perfect destiny afterwards, such that

> > > you cannot say " well I don't like this Master, I do not accept this

> > > way of life " . You have to go through the Path set before you and

> > > endure the difficulties untill the end, for otherwise the

> > consequence

> > > will not be fruitful at all. However :) if the time is not ripe

> > > enough most probably the Master will not appear. Life cannot put

> > you

> > > in a temptation of denial higher than your spiritual maturity.

> > >

> > > The same friend told me something else that was from his own

> > > experience. He said that after years of thorough searching for a

> > > Master he found it in himself. Although such words *might* seem

> > > spiritually poetic and appealing but " not realistic " but it touched

> > > me to some extent, and made me think that maybe there is a voice

> > > inside me that I ignore that is guiding me and I'm unable to

> > listen.

> > > It reminds me of the beautiful message of the movie " I am Legend "

> > > when Will Smith remembered what his daughter was telling him one

> > day

> > > when he was too busy " Look at the Butterfly~ " , and he ignored the

> > low

> > > voice of innocense in the background, but when he rememberd at the

> > > end of the movie, he knew what to do!

> > >

> > > :)

> > > arto

> > >

> > > , Alan Jacobs

> > > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear friends,

> > > >

> > > > Barry and I have agreed to forward our off line correspondence to

> > > the Group as it may be useful to some members.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Alan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- On Fri, 2/1/09, Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs@ ...>

> > > > > Re: Is a Living Guru necessary? from Barry

> > > > > " barry domegan " <bazzadom@ .>

> > > > > Friday, 2 January, 2009, 5:28 AM

> > > > > Dear Barry,

> > > > >

> > > > > There are two points of view on this, for and against.

> > > > > Bhagavan said that he never claimed a living Guru was

> > > > > unnecessary and the Guru may appear when the time is ripe-

> > > > > or words to that effect. Murugana's school with which I

> > > > > broadly agree, says that a living Guru is not strictly

> > > > > necessary as Bhagavan is alive in the Heart as pure

> > > > > consciousness awareness, his formless form, as it were. I

> > > > > have found this to be the case.

> > > > >

> > > > > Paradoxically, however, Muruganar, Sadhu Om, and Michael

> > > > > James all have had living Gurus. My own view is that one can

> > > > > manage without a living Guru for this reason that he is in

> > > > > the Heart, BUT if one is presented to you who fills the

> > > > > criteria of love and peace in their presence then it is a

> > > > > help and is grace.. They will answer questioins re.

> > > > > difficulties in sadhana which you personally find. Also when

> > > > > they tell you something it strikes the mind with greater

> > > > > authority than all you read in books. Either way - it is in

> > > > > the karma, that you may or may not have one, but progress

> > > > > can be made with sincere effort either way.

> > > > >

> > > > > All love,

> > > > >

> > > > > Alan

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Thu, 1/1/09, barry domegan

> > > > > <bazzadom@ .> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > barry domegan <bazzadom@ .>

> > > > > > Is a Living Guru necessary? from Barry

> > > > > > " Alan Jacobs "

> > > > > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...>

> > > > > > Thursday, 1 January, 2009, 7:04 PM

> > > > > > Alan,

> > > > > > I've just come across an interesting quote on

> > > > > the

> > > > > > subject of a living Guru, a question thats often vexed

> > > > > me

> > > > > > since I read that robert Adams said that a living Guru

> > > > > was

> > > > > > necessary.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sri Sadhu Om often said that no true disciple of Sri

> > > > > > Ramana can be a guru, because Sri Ramana alone is the

> > > > > guru

> > > > > > of all who are attracted to his teachings. Whenever

> > > > > anyone

> > > > > > asked him whether it is not necessary for us to have a

> > > > > > 'living guru', Sri Sadhu Om used to laugh and

> > > > > say,

> > > > > > " guru alone is living, and we are all dead " ,

> > > > > and

> > > > > > he explained the real guru is not a physical body but

> > > > > is the

> > > > > > ever-living spirit, the infinite consciousness of

> > > > > being that

> > > > > > exists within each one of us as our own true self.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ~ Michael James

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Interesting is it not?

> > > > > > Barry

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please misspell it.. it kicks my Ego :)

arto

 

, " harshaimtm " wrote:

>

> Sorry for misspelling your name Arto.

>

> Namaste and love

> Harsha

>

> , " harshaimtm " <harsha@> wrote:

> >

> > Wonderful conversation. Welcome to the sangha orto. The force of the

> > guru works through the collective wisdom of the sangha. Sri Ramana

> > used to say that if one has found the right company of good souls that

> > helps to ripen the mind. Thanks Alan, orto, Jeff, Ram, Mouna, Joyce,

> > Jill, Tony, Peter, James, for sharing your wonderful insights.

> >

> > Also, thank you Era, Tony, Joyce, Jill, Jerry, and so many others for

> > the good wishes sent for the 10th anniversary of HS.

> >

> > We have all been together a long time. The warmth of your friendship

> > and love is comforting.

> >

> > Namaste and love to all

> > Harsha

> >

> > easy-and-natural-is-the-way-by-dr-harsh-k-luthar

> >

> >

> >

> > , Alan Jacobs

> > <alanadamsjacobs@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Arto,

> > >  

> > > I like your analogy- it is quite original and effective. I feel you

> > have come to the correct conclusion. Your destiny will not be impeded.

> > Iswara preordains each life for each individual for his spiritual

> > development until Realisation when destiny in this sense ends. This

> > answer was given to Brunton by the Maharshi and is recorded in their

> > dialogues in a book called Conscious Immortality. If you are meant to

> > have an external Guru you will be given one, meanwhile you have an

> > inner Guru deep in your Heart who will guide you.

> > >  

> > > All best wishes, blessings and warm regards,

> > >  

> > > Alan

> > >

> > > --- On Mon, 5/1/09, arto <iamarto@> wrote:

> > >

> > > arto <iamarto@>

> > > Re: Is a Living Guru

> > necessary? from Barry

> > >

> > > Monday, 5 January, 2009, 4:10 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Alan,

> > >

> > > Please correspond as much as you can :)

> > >

> > > Well, what I mean of " free will " there is the relative one. I know

> > > that free will is only *apparent* and not real. I only meant

that if

> > > before asking for the Master I had imagined several

possibilities of

> > > how to spend my life, there would remain only one possibility

> > > afterwards (to my own relative perspective/ will) and I had to

stick

> > > to that possibility because it's the best.

> > >

> > > However, yes from the absolute Consciousness perspective there

is no

> > > free will and the Maharshi's quote for it is as follows:

> > >

> > > There is neither creation nor destruction, Neither destiny nor free

> > > will, Neither path nor achievement. -- Maharshi

> > >

> > > Recently this free-will issue has been an issue of

contemplation, and

> > > I've imagined it in the form of a billiard/snooker (pool) game.

Let's

> > > say that there's a peace of plastic made in the form of " C " that

> > > contains a bunch of balls on the billiard table, and every bunch of

> > > balls in " C " represents the thoughts/beliefs of an individual. The

> > > free-will thought is represented as the white ball outside of the

> > > plastic " C " , and although the inner thoughts and beliefs could be

> > > bombarded with the free will thought (white ball) from outside

> > > the " C " , no balls could escape the " C " shaped plastic. And this

is a

> > > rule that we set at will, assuming that individual

> > > intelligence/ knowledge is constantly limited as far as it is Ego-

> > > attached.

> > >

> > > This free-will thought (white ball) is a very dangerous ball,

because

> > > the individual might fall into the trap that he could escape his

> > > predetermined destiny by bombarding his own thoughts (balls in " C "

> > > shape) with the free-will thought and the outcome is suicide as an

> > > attempt to " outsmart God " .

> > >

> > > So why is this thought-trap ignorance? Because no matter how (in

> > > which way/direction/ power) the white ball bombards the other

> balls in

> > > the " C " shape, all the probabilities of how the balls will interact

> > > to resolve an outcome will be limited by the boundaries physical

> > > dimensions and qualities of the " C " shape (limited by Ego's

Capacity)

> > > and all the probabilities are pre-calculated by the Self which is

> > > aware of all possibilities, and aware of the final possibility that

> > > the individual will conclude.

> > >

> > > :) Final conclusion? No free-will, and any attachment to thought

> > > processes, beliefs or concepts is a prison so vast to be easily

> > > recognized. Then you can easily compare an unenlightened/

unRealised

> > > human being to the Chessmaster software engine running on a

computer.

> > >

> > > arto

> > >

> > > , Alan Jacobs

> > > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Arto,

> > > >  

> > > > Forgive me in intervening in your correspondence with Barry. You

> > > say 'there's no more free will'. But the so called free will weÂ

> > >  imagine we have is only apparant, and is part of the structureÂ

> > >  inbuilt in the predetermination .There are quotes from

> > Bhagavan to

> > > back this up. Free Will is a vexatious question,.We are advised to

> > > look for the source of he who thinks he has or has not free will.

> > > That is Self Enquiry.

> > > >  

> > > > All best wishes and regards,

> > > >  

> > > > Alan

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 5/1/09, arto <iamarto@ > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > arto <iamarto@ >

> > > > Re: Is a Living Guru

> > > necessary? from Barry

> > > >

> > > > Monday, 5 January, 2009, 10:50 AM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Barry,

> > > >

> > > > I believe this is a very common question, and I am personally

> > > asking

> > > > the same one to myself always up-till now.

> > > >

> > > > Yet, I have some thoughts and beliefs that could help in

> > > > determination.

> > > >

> > > > One of the thoughts that had an impact on me was an answer to

this

> > > > question from a corresponding friend. He told me that I can

> > > sincerely

> > > > ask the universe for a living Master, and if the request is

> > > earnest,

> > > > the time is ripe enough, and you are persistent, the desire

will be

> > > > granted and a Master will appear in your life.

> > > >

> > > > But then there is something to ponder.. once the living Master

> > > > appears in your life, there's no more free-will. The grace of the

> > > > Master as a gift from heaven has to be accepted by the requestor

> > > > along with the pre-determined path of perfection. When you

meet the

> > > > Master you cannot escape the perfect destiny afterwards, such

that

> > > > you cannot say " well I don't like this Master, I do not accept

this

> > > > way of life " . You have to go through the Path set before you and

> > > > endure the difficulties untill the end, for otherwise the

> > > consequence

> > > > will not be fruitful at all. However :) if the time is not ripe

> > > > enough most probably the Master will not appear. Life cannot put

> > > you

> > > > in a temptation of denial higher than your spiritual maturity.

> > > >

> > > > The same friend told me something else that was from his own

> > > > experience. He said that after years of thorough searching for a

> > > > Master he found it in himself. Although such words *might* seem

> > > > spiritually poetic and appealing but " not realistic " but it

touched

> > > > me to some extent, and made me think that maybe there is a voice

> > > > inside me that I ignore that is guiding me and I'm unable to

> > > listen.

> > > > It reminds me of the beautiful message of the movie " I am Legend "

> > > > when Will Smith remembered what his daughter was telling him one

> > > day

> > > > when he was too busy " Look at the Butterfly~ " , and he ignored the

> > > low

> > > > voice of innocense in the background, but when he rememberd at

the

> > > > end of the movie, he knew what to do!

> > > >

> > > > :)

> > > > arto

> > > >

> > > > , Alan Jacobs

> > > > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear friends,

> > > > >

> > > > > Barry and I have agreed to forward our off line

correspondence to

> > > > the Group as it may be useful to some members.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Alan

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Fri, 2/1/09, Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs@ ...>

> > > > > > Re: Is a Living Guru necessary? from Barry

> > > > > > " barry domegan " <bazzadom@ .>

> > > > > > Friday, 2 January, 2009, 5:28 AM

> > > > > > Dear Barry,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are two points of view on this, for and against.

> > > > > > Bhagavan said that he never claimed a living Guru was

> > > > > > unnecessary and the Guru may appear when the time is ripe-

> > > > > > or words to that effect. Murugana's school with which I

> > > > > > broadly agree, says that a living Guru is not strictly

> > > > > > necessary as Bhagavan is alive in the Heart as pure

> > > > > > consciousness awareness, his formless form, as it were. I

> > > > > > have found this to be the case.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Paradoxically, however, Muruganar, Sadhu Om, and Michael

> > > > > > James all have had living Gurus. My own view is that one can

> > > > > > manage without a living Guru for this reason that he is in

> > > > > > the Heart, BUT if one is presented to you who fills the

> > > > > > criteria of love and peace in their presence then it is a

> > > > > > help and is grace.. They will answer questioins re.

> > > > > > difficulties in sadhana which you personally find. Also when

> > > > > > they tell you something it strikes the mind with greater

> > > > > > authority than all you read in books. Either way - it is in

> > > > > > the karma, that you may or may not have one, but progress

> > > > > > can be made with sincere effort either way.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > All love,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Alan

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- On Thu, 1/1/09, barry domegan

> > > > > > <bazzadom@ .> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > barry domegan <bazzadom@ .>

> > > > > > > Is a Living Guru necessary? from Barry

> > > > > > > " Alan Jacobs "

> > > > > > <alanadamsjacobs@ ...>

> > > > > > > Thursday, 1 January, 2009, 7:04 PM

> > > > > > > Alan,

> > > > > > > I've just come across an interesting quote on

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > subject of a living Guru, a question thats often vexed

> > > > > > me

> > > > > > > since I read that robert Adams said that a living Guru

> > > > > > was

> > > > > > > necessary.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sri Sadhu Om often said that no true disciple of Sri

> > > > > > > Ramana can be a guru, because Sri Ramana alone is the

> > > > > > guru

> > > > > > > of all who are attracted to his teachings. Whenever

> > > > > > anyone

> > > > > > > asked him whether it is not necessary for us to have a

> > > > > > > 'living guru', Sri Sadhu Om used to laugh and

> > > > > > say,

> > > > > > > " guru alone is living, and we are all dead " ,

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > he explained the real guru is not a physical body but

> > > > > > is the

> > > > > > > ever-living spirit, the infinite consciousness of

> > > > > > being that

> > > > > > > exists within each one of us as our own true self.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ~ Michael James

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Interesting is it not?

> > > > > > > Barry

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...