Guest guest Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 44 Except in consiousness of truth, it is impossible for a life possesing beauty,the manifestation of true love,to exist. 45 Padam,declaring the majesty of jnana,states: " It is only through jnana that the bliss that derives from true love will arise. " 46 It is only in the field of jnana experience that the joy of the Self,which is love, can take root and grow. 47 In everyone true love towards oneself exists as one's own nature.Therefore,one's true nature is bliss. 49 Conciousness alone is the experience of true love.Sencory experiences,which are not consiousness,are only a spurious semblance of that love. 50 Only true love that has taken the form of pure consiousness is the Siva bhakti that has attained fullness,true jnana. Sri Ramana Gita,chapter 16,verse 4: Love flowing like a stream of oil towards the Supreme Lord, even without his desire, takes the mind of a person surely to his true form. 51 Until one knows consiousness,it is not possible for anyone to know the nature of devotion,the relationship with true love. 52 Only the abandonment of the sense of separation can be termed as rejoicing in the true love that rises in pure Sivam. 53 Because the Self has bliss as its nature,love towards the Self exists in the jiva as its true nature. 54 Unless one loves the Self as one's ow swarupa,it is impossible to abide as one really is in the Heart. Bhagavan: Love itself is the actual form of God. If by saying, " I do not love this;I do not love that " ,you reject all things,that which remains is swarupa,innate Self. That is pure bliss. Call it pure bliss, God, Atma or what you will. That is devotion; that is realisation and that is everything. All from Padamalai. In my opinion there can not be two kinds of love, so what is the point of making distinctions between Love and love? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 Der Andreas,Thanks for this. Padamalai is a great book! In my view it is the advanced teaching of Bhagavan given to Muragana. All love and best wishes from Arunachala! OmLove,Alan--- On Wed, 7/10/09, Andreas <pandaena wrote:Andreas <pandaena Love Date: Wednesday, 7 October, 2009, 12:49 PM 44 Except in consiousness of truth, it is impossible for a life possesing beauty,the manifestation of true love,to exist. 45 Padam,declaring the majesty of jnana,states: "It is only through jnana that the bliss that derives from true love will arise." 46 It is only in the field of jnana experience that the joy of the Self,which is love, can take root and grow. 47 In everyone true love towards oneself exists as one's own nature.Therefore, one's true nature is bliss. 49 Conciousness alone is the experience of true love.Sencory experiences, which are not consiousness, are only a spurious semblance of that love. 50 Only true love that has taken the form of pure consiousness is the Siva bhakti that has attained fullness,true jnana. Sri Ramana Gita,chapter 16,verse 4: Love flowing like a stream of oil towards the Supreme Lord, even without his desire, takes the mind of a person surely to his true form. 51 Until one knows consiousness, it is not possible for anyone to know the nature of devotion,the relationship with true love. 52 Only the abandonment of the sense of separation can be termed as rejoicing in the true love that rises in pure Sivam. 53 Because the Self has bliss as its nature,love towards the Self exists in the jiva as its true nature. 54 Unless one loves the Self as one's ow swarupa,it is impossible to abide as one really is in the Heart. Bhagavan: Love itself is the actual form of God. If by saying,"I do not love this;I do not love that",you reject all things,that which remains is swarupa,innate Self. That is pure bliss. Call it pure bliss, God, Atma or what you will. That is devotion; that is realisation and that is everything. All from Padamalai. In my opinion there can not be two kinds of love, so what is the point of making distinctions between Love and love? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 > Namaste dear Alan, > >I am really happy that you see it that way,that is also my >experience with it. >I dont know when exactly you started posting >from Padamalai, but I remember that I was in Tiru at that time and >so i followed your recommendation to get at its truth. >Remarkably it was only after i was properly prepared by the Maja Yoga >that Pandamalai came in to action. >Indeed dear Alan, Padamalai is a great book! >In His love, af , Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs wrote: > > Der Andreas, > > Thanks for this. Padamalai is a great book! In my view it is the advanced teaching of Bhagavan given to Muragana. All love and best wishes from Arunachala! Om > > Love, > > Alan > > --- On Wed, 7/10/09, Andreas <pandaena wrote: > > Andreas <pandaena > Love > > Wednesday, 7 October, 2009, 12:49 PM > > > > > > 44 Except in consiousness of truth, it is impossible > > for a life possesing beauty,the manifestation > > of true love,to exist. > > > > 45 Padam,declaring the majesty of jnana,states: > > " It is only through jnana that the bliss that > > derives from true love will arise. " > > > > 46 It is only in the field of jnana experience > > that the joy of the Self,which is love, > > can take root and grow. > > > > 47 In everyone true love towards oneself exists > > as one's own nature.Therefore, one's true nature is bliss. > > > > 49 Conciousness alone is the experience of true love.Sencory > > experiences, which are not consiousness, are only a spurious > > semblance of that love. > > > > 50 Only true love that has taken the form of pure consiousness > > is the Siva bhakti that has attained fullness,true jnana. > > > > Sri Ramana Gita,chapter 16,verse 4: > > > > Love flowing like a stream of oil towards the Supreme > > Lord, even without his desire, takes the mind of a person > > surely to his true form. > > > > 51 Until one knows consiousness, it is not possible for anyone > > to know the nature of devotion,the relationship with true love. > > > > 52 Only the abandonment of the sense of separation can be termed > > as rejoicing in the true love that rises in pure Sivam. > > > > 53 Because the Self has bliss as its nature,love towards the Self > > exists in the jiva as its true nature. > > > > 54 Unless one loves the Self as one's ow swarupa,it is impossible > > to abide as one really is in the Heart. > > > > Bhagavan: Love itself is the actual form of God. If by > > saying, " I do not love this;I do not love that " ,you reject all > > things,that which remains is swarupa,innate Self. > > That is pure bliss. Call it pure bliss, God, Atma or what > > you will. That is devotion; that is realisation and that is everything. > > > > All from Padamalai. > > > > In my opinion there can not be two kinds of love, > > so what is the point of making distinctions between > > Love and love? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 My dear Andreas,I fully agree! I hope more members read it. All love and greetings from Arunachala!--- On Fri, 9/10/09, Andreas <pandaena wrote:Andreas <pandaena Re: Love Date: Friday, 9 October, 2009, 12:51 AM > Namaste dear Alan, > >I am really happy that you see it that way,that is also my >experience with it. >I dont know when exactly you started posting >from Padamalai, but I remember that I was in Tiru at that time and >so i followed your recommendation to get at its truth. >Remarkably it was only after i was properly prepared by the Maja Yoga >that Pandamalai came in to action. >Indeed dear Alan, Padamalai is a great book! >In His love, af , Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs@ ...> wrote: > > Der Andreas, > > Thanks for this. Padamalai is a great book! In my view it is the advanced teaching of Bhagavan given to Muragana. All love and best wishes from Arunachala! Om > > Love, > > Alan > > --- On Wed, 7/10/09, Andreas <pandaena@.. .> wrote: > > Andreas <pandaena@.. .> > Love > > Wednesday, 7 October, 2009, 12:49 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > 44 Except in consiousness of truth, it is impossible > > for a life possesing beauty,the manifestation > > of true love,to exist. > > > > 45 Padam,declaring the majesty of jnana,states: > > "It is only through jnana that the bliss that > > derives from true love will arise." > > > > 46 It is only in the field of jnana experience > > that the joy of the Self,which is love, > > can take root and grow. > > > > 47 In everyone true love towards oneself exists > > as one's own nature.Therefore, one's true nature is bliss. > > > > 49 Conciousness alone is the experience of true love.Sencory > > experiences, which are not consiousness, are only a spurious > > semblance of that love. > > > > 50 Only true love that has taken the form of pure consiousness > > is the Siva bhakti that has attained fullness,true jnana. > > > > Sri Ramana Gita,chapter 16,verse 4: > > > > Love flowing like a stream of oil towards the Supreme > > Lord, even without his desire, takes the mind of a person > > surely to his true form. > > > > 51 Until one knows consiousness, it is not possible for anyone > > to know the nature of devotion,the relationship with true love. > > > > 52 Only the abandonment of the sense of separation can be termed > > as rejoicing in the true love that rises in pure Sivam. > > > > 53 Because the Self has bliss as its nature,love towards the Self > > exists in the jiva as its true nature. > > > > 54 Unless one loves the Self as one's ow swarupa,it is impossible > > to abide as one really is in the Heart. > > > > Bhagavan: Love itself is the actual form of God. If by > > saying,"I do not love this;I do not love that",you reject all > > things,that which remains is swarupa,innate Self. > > That is pure bliss. Call it pure bliss, God, Atma or what > > you will. That is devotion; that is realisation and that is everything. > > > > All from Padamalai. > > > > In my opinion there can not be two kinds of love, > > so what is the point of making distinctions between > > Love and love? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.