On Self Enquiry

[Guest guest]

on the Quest

 

Question 1: Should I go an asking 'Who am I?' without answering?

Who asks whom? Which bhavana (attitude) should be in the mind at the time of

enquiry? What is 'I' the self or the ego?

 

Answer: In the enquiry 'Who am I?', 'I' is the ego. The question really means,

what is the source or origin of this ego? You need not have any bhavana in the

mind. All that is required is, you must give up the bhavana that you are the

body, of such and such a description, with such and such a name, etc. There is

no need to have a bhavana about your real nature. It exists as it always does;

it is real and no bhavana.

 

************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *********

Day by Day, 3.1.46 Afternoon

[Guest guest]

Very clear. (As Ramana alwaysis).

 

, Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs wrote:

>

> on the Quest

>

> Question 1: Should I go an asking 'Who am I?' without answering?

> Who asks whom? Which bhavana (attitude) should be in the mind at the time of

enquiry? What is 'I' the self or the ego?

>

> Answer: In the enquiry 'Who am I?', 'I' is the ego. The question really means,

what is the source or origin of this ego? You need not have any bhavana in the

mind. All that is required is, you must give up the bhavana that you are the

body, of such and such a description, with such and such a name, etc. There is

no need to have a bhavana about your real nature. It exists as it always does;

it is real and no bhavana.

>

> ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *********

> Day by Day, 3.1.46 Afternoon

>

[Guest guest]

Dear friends

 

agree completely with what Dear Richard wrote

just one comment out of practical experiences with soooo many "people on the path"

and be assured am leaving them like they want to be

b u t

in the moment when they try to convince those who really put EVERYTHING in their search than and only than "enough is enough"

 

 

ramanas statements are very clear indeed for those who are 100percent on their way back home

and like our dear SadGuru Sri Ramana Maharshi stated "somewhere" and "often"

 

the readines to walk the walk in this manner is only existing with around max one in millions.....

and this is the "same" like what scienticts discovered too

around 3percent of human population are ready for the "most"

 

but as our friend Rupert Sheldrake discovered with the "morphogenetic field" a certain percentage of animal or human population is necessary to reach another stage of "evolution"

 

 

b u t

 

dear friends

 

 

is this in the "plan" of SELF?

 

is it not like this

 

mother earth is the planet for teaching us what we need to learn in order to come HOME again

to be ONE again fully with SELFGDLOVE however we call it?????

 

 

your response is more than welcome

 

 

yours in bhagavan

 

michael

 

-

Richard

Monday, February 08, 2010 2:59 PM

Re: On Self Enquiry

Very clear. (As Ramana alwaysis). , Alan Jacobs <alanadamsjacobs wrote:>> on the Quest > > Question 1: Should I go an asking 'Who am I?' without answering?> Who asks whom? Which bhavana (attitude) should be in the mind at the time of enquiry? What is 'I' the self or the ego?> > Answer: In the enquiry 'Who am I?', 'I' is the ego. The question really means, what is the source or origin of this ego? You need not have any bhavana in the mind. All that is required is, you must give up the bhavana that you are the body, of such and such a description, with such and such a name, etc. There is no need to have a bhavana about your real nature. It exists as it always does; it is real and no bhavana.> > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* > Day by Day, 3.1.46 Afternoon>