Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Krushna - My moon is 07:13:35,means In Scorpio 13 degree 35 mins On Parashara's Light, the Moon comes out to 13:34:50. Do you suggest that we always round off to the nearest minute when the seconds reach a certain point, like 50 or above, for example? If so then the longitude matches exactly, 13:35. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Krushna - At least degrees of moon should be taken to seconds. A difference of one sec.in the degree of moon,If it is in the constellation of Venus, gives difference of 3 hours and 39 mins, and minimum in the constellation of Sun is one hour 6 min. So it should be taken up to seconds. That's good to know, thanks. As far as the other planets however, just leave the degrees to the nearest minute and forget about the seconds if the program shows the seconds as well? > My program of astrology gives reading only upto minits. That is the problem. While calculating the dasha it takes correct value. Which programs specifically do you use for this? Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Peter - In my PL the moon comes out at exactly 13Sc35. In mine too, except I have to round it off from 13:34:50 first. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Krushna - If it is available with the program it is well and good. At present accuracy up to navamansha chart is sufficient. OK, thanks. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Donna, At least degrees of moon should be taken to seconds. A difference of one sec.in the degree of moon,If it is in the constellation of Venus, gives difference of 3 hours and 39 mins, and minimum in the constellation of Sun is one hour 6 min. So it should be taken up to seconds. My program of astrology gives reading only upto minits. That is the problem. While calculating the dasha it takes correct value. krushna >DQuinn12 > > > Re: Rounding off? >Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:19:32 EST > >Dear Krushna - > > > > > >On Parashara's Light, the Moon comes out to 13:34:50. Do you suggest that >we >always round off to the nearest minute when the seconds reach a certain >point, like 50 or above, for example? If so then the longitude matches >exactly, 13:35. > >Donna _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Donna, In my PL the moon comes out at exactly 13Sc35. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Donna, If the programm you are using gives value up to secs. it is good. If we go to the detailed section of this system, where we need accurate calculations up to secs. That is based on the nadi of each planets. If it is available with the program it is well and good. At present accuracy up to navamansha chart is sufficient. krushna >DQuinn12 > > > Re: Rounding off? >Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:05:18 EST > >Dear Krushna - > > > > At least degrees of moon should be taken to seconds. A difference of > > one sec.in the degree of moon,If it is in the constellation of Venus, >gives > > difference of 3 hours and 39 mins, and minimum in the constellation of >Sun > > is one hour 6 min. So it should be taken up to seconds. > > >That's good to know, thanks. As far as the other planets however, just >leave >the degrees to the nearest minute and forget about the seconds if the >program >shows the seconds as well? > > > My program of astrology gives reading only upto minits. That is the >problem. While calculating the dasha it takes correct value. > >Which programs specifically do you use for this? > >Donna > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Peter - But mine gave me 13:35:00 right from the start. Did you check under the ayanamsha to find out what it says? (This can be found under the Astronomy option). Mine matched Krushna's ayanamsha exactly, because I set the option to 01:01:35. What about you? Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Peter - No my Ayanamsa is usually about 9 or 10 seconds different from Krushna but as it gives the same lagna and Moon I accept it. In any case Krushna's ayanamsa is very inconsistent and does not agree with the actual figures he gave us in the first place. The annual increase of 50.33 secs does not show up as that even on the 100year table which he gave us. Lets not get into the ayanamsa problems again. I know with the Parashara's Light, as long as he gives us the ayanamsha he uses, we can usually fudge the seconds around to get it exact with his and then re-check it on the Astronomy option to see if it matches exactly. That's why I asked you. I think it would be a good idea if Krushna also gave the Lagna as well as the ayanamsha when he gives out the blind chart exercises in the future, like we do in SA. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Donna, In mine too, except I have to round it off from 13:34:50 first. But mine gave me 13:35:00 right from the start. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2001 Report Share Posted March 11, 2001 Dear Donna, No my Ayanamsa is usually about 9 or 10 seconds different from Krushna but as it gives the same lagna and Moon I accept it. In any case Krushna's ayanamsa is very inconsistent and does not agree with the actual figures he gave us in the first place. The annual increase of 50.33 secs does not show up as that even on the 100year table which he gave us. Lets not get into the ayanamsa problems again. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2001 Report Share Posted March 12, 2001 Dear Sylvia - I have been using Jagannatha Hora Lite and when I subtract 1deg 1 min. 40 sec I get for the Libra chart asc. 6 Libra 26 and for the event in 1991 I get venus subperiod april 13, 1991 but when I adjust the seconds to 1deg 1 min. 36 sec, I still get asc.6 Libra 26, the only thing that changes is the Vimsottari Dasa with 1 deg 1 min 36 seconds I get Venus subperiod april 14, 1991. The moon is 2 Sc 51 in both examples. As long as you can get the ayanamsha to match Krushna's for each blind chart, then that's fine. You may have to adjust it each time but at least it'll match. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2001 Report Share Posted March 12, 2001 Dear Donna, Yes it probably would be a good idea for him to give us his lagna. I simply use Ramans ayanamsa with an offset of -00:25:00 and it seems to work very well. Peter Namaste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2001 Report Share Posted March 12, 2001 Dear Donna and Peter, I have been using Jagannatha Hora Lite and when I subtract 1deg 1 min. 40 sec I get for the Libra chart asc. 6 Libra 26 and for the event in 1991 I get venus subperiod april 13, 1991 but when I adjust the seconds to 1deg 1 min. 36 sec, I still get asc.6 Libra 26, the only thing that changes is the Vimsottari Dasa with 1 deg 1 min 36 seconds I get Venus subperiod april 14, 1991. The moon is 2 Sc 51 in both examples. Sylvia On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:17:42 EST DQuinn12 writes: > Dear Peter - > > > > No my Ayanamsa is usually about 9 or 10 seconds different from > Krushna but > > as it gives the same lagna and Moon I accept it. In any case > Krushna's > > ayanamsa is very inconsistent and does not agree with the actual > figures he > > gave us in the first place. The annual increase of 50.33 secs does > not show > > up as that even on the 100year table which he gave us. Lets not > get into > > the ayanamsa problems again. > > > > I know with the Parashara's Light, as long as he gives us the > ayanamsha he > uses, we can usually fudge the seconds around to get it exact with > his and > then re-check it on the Astronomy option to see if it matches > exactly. That's > why I asked you. I think it would be a good idea if Krushna also > gave the > Lagna as well as the ayanamsha when he gives out the blind chart > exercises in > the future, like we do in SA. > > Donna ______________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.