Guest guest Posted March 16, 2001 Report Share Posted March 16, 2001 Dear Krushna - It is all right, Go ahead. Thanks, Krushna. I would also like to add in the further clarification that you made to Peter earlier in reagrd to the length of the bhuktis before I add it to the FILE section so that it will be made a little clearer, but before I do that could y ou plaease explain the second pargraph again to me? I find it very confusing to understand for some reason. Once I get it straight in my head, I can make it alot clearer in the lesson too. My questions below will be in caps. In the case when Saturn the delay causing planet is not aspecting, or the significating planet is not having relation with Saturn, ( not in the navamansha of Saturn or Sign or constellation ruled by Saturn. Then the event will be earlier in the sub period. THIS PART I UNDERSTAND AND CAN MAKE A LITTLE CLEARER IN THE LESSON AS WELL. Now the case is of Venus, and assumed that it is not in the constellation of Saturn or Jupiter. OK, GOT THAT. It means it should be in first eight signs. WHY? IN ORDER FOR IT TO BRING ABOUT AN EARLY EVENT YOU MEAN? WHAT IF VENUS HAPPENS TO FALL IN THE CONSTELLATION OF REVATI AND/OR ANY OTHER CONSTELLATION BESIDES THE FIRST 8? PLEASE EXPLAIN AGAIN. and in that also not in the constellation of Jupiter and Saturn. OK. So if it is in Aswini, Bharani, Rohini, Ashlesha, Magha, Purva, Uttara, Hasta, Chitra, Swati constellation, the period should be as per the lord of constellation. Rohini,Uttara, Ashlesha, Hasta, THIS IS CONFUSING TO ME. WHAT ABOUT MRIGISHIRA, PURNAVASU AND PUSHYAMI? YOU SEEMED TO HAVE LEFT THESE OUT AS PART OF THE FIRST 8 SIGNS. COULD YOU RE-EXPLAIN THIS PART BY USING AN EXAMPLE FOR INSTANCE AS TO WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY HERE? Gives in first part, Remaing in 2nd part. GIVES WHAT IN THE FIRST PART? WHAT'S REMAINING IN THE 2ND PART? PLEASE CLARIFY. ( I MUST BE HAVING A DUMB DAY. . . ) The constellations I omited in the first 8 signs are bad for Venus. Venus in Krittika, Aradra, Jestha, ( and Mul) spoils the nature of Venus. So result will not be favourable. IS THERE ANY SPECIFIC EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THESE PARTICULAR NAKSHATRA POSITIONS ARE WEAK FOR VENUS? Thanks, Krushna! ) Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2001 Report Share Posted March 16, 2001 Dear Donna, More clearification against your question >DQuinn12 > > > Re: Lesson 16 questions >Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:54:09 EST > > Dear Krushna - > > > > It is all right, Go ahead. > > > Thanks, Krushna. > I would also like to add in the further clarification that you made to >Peter earlier in >reagrd to the length of the bhuktis before I add it to the FILE section so >that it will be >made a little clearer, but before I do that could y ou plaease explain the >second >pargraph again to me? I find it very confusing to understand for some >reason. >Once >I get it straight in my head, I can make it alot clearer in the lesson too. >My questions below will be in caps. > > > >In the case when Saturn the delay causing planet is not aspecting, or >the significating planet is not having relation with Saturn, ( not in >the navamansha of Saturn or Sign or constellation ruled by Saturn. >Then the event will be earlier in the sub period. > >THIS PART I UNDERSTAND AND CAN MAKE A LITTLE CLEARER IN THE LESSON AS WELL. > >Now the case is of Venus, and assumed that it is not in the >constellation of Saturn or Jupiter. > >OK, GOT THAT. > >It means it should be in first eight signs. >Last eight signs are related to Jupiter and Saturn. >WHY? IN ORDER FOR IT TO BRING ABOUT AN EARLY EVENT YOU MEAN? WHAT IF VENUS >HAPPENS TO FALL IN THE CONSTELLATION OF REVATI AND/OR ANY OTHER >CONSTELLATION >BESIDES THE FIRST 8? PLEASE EXPLAIN AGAIN. 9th sign is ruled by Jupiter, >10th and 11th by Saturn and 12th sign is ruled by Jupiter. It should be >seen from sign or constellation. When it is said that Venus is not having >any connection with Saturn and or Jupiter, it means it is not in last four >signs. > >and in that also not in the constellation of Jupiter and Saturn. > >OK. > >So if it is in Aswini, Bharani, Rohini, Ashlesha, Magha, >Purva, Uttara, Hasta, Chitra, Swati constellation, the period should >be as per the lord of constellation. Rohini,Uttara, Ashlesha, Hasta, > > >THIS IS CONFUSING TO ME. WHAT ABOUT MRIGISHIRA, PURNAVASU AND PUSHYAMI? YOU >SEEMED TO HAVE LEFT THESE OUT AS PART OF THE FIRST 8 SIGNS. COULD YOU >RE-EXPLAIN THIS PART BY USING AN EXAMPLE FOR INSTANCE AS TO WHAT YOU'RE >TRYING TO SAY HERE?If you have read that Sun, Moon, Mercury gives the >result in early part of the sub period. Mrug is ruled by Mars, so it will >be in second part. Punarvasu and Pushya are ruled by Jupiter and Saturn >respectively. So avoided. > >Gives in first part, Remaing in 2nd part. > >GIVES WHAT IN THE FIRST PART? WHAT'S REMAINING IN THE 2ND PART? >PLEASE CLARIFY. ( I MUST BE HAVING A DUMB DAY. . . ) If Venus is the >significator, and if it is in the sign and Constellation of Sun, Moon, >Mercury then the results may be axcepted in the first part of the sub >period. ( We have divided the sub period in 3 equal parts) > > The constellations I omited >in the first 8 signs are bad for Venus. Venus in Krittika, Aradra, >Jestha, ( and Mul) spoils the nature of Venus. So result will not be >favourable. > >IS THERE ANY SPECIFIC EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THESE PARTICULAR NAKSHATRA >POSITIONS ARE WEAK FOR VENUS? I think this have been explained in the last >lessons, regarding delayed marriage, or diverce, or loss of spouse. If you see keenly for all the examples of unhappy marriage, you will find Venus in these constelations. You can also study the BA 60 chart of satva group,( if I remember correctly) the Venus is in the constellation of Krittika, and Jupiter in Libra. So women is facing the problem in her marriage life. I think this will clear. Peter asked only for Venus, So I gave explaination related to Venus Only.......krushna >Thanks, Krushna! ) > >Donna > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2001 Report Share Posted March 17, 2001 Dear Krushna - I have answered for it, it may be in delayed posting. If it not reaches I will answer again. I've received all your other mail so far, but not the one answering the questions I had from the Lesson 16 paragraph reply to Ron. Could you please re-send? Thanks - Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2001 Report Share Posted March 17, 2001 Dear Donna, I have answered for it, it may be in delayed posting. If it not reaches I will answer again. krushna , DQuinn12@A... wrote: > Dear Krushna - > > > > It is all right, Go ahead. > > > Thanks, Krushna. > I would also like to add in the further clarification that you made to > Peter earlier in > reagrd to the length of the bhuktis before I add it to the FILE section so > that it will be > made a little clearer, but before I do that could y ou plaease explain the > second > pargraph again to me? I find it very confusing to understand for some reason. > Once > I get it straight in my head, I can make it alot clearer in the lesson too. > My questions below will be in caps. > > > > In the case when Saturn the delay causing planet is not aspecting, or > the significating planet is not having relation with Saturn, ( not in > the navamansha of Saturn or Sign or constellation ruled by Saturn. > Then the event will be earlier in the sub period. > > THIS PART I UNDERSTAND AND CAN MAKE A LITTLE CLEARER IN THE LESSON AS WELL. > > Now the case is of Venus, and assumed that it is not in the > constellation of Saturn or Jupiter. > > OK, GOT THAT. > > It means it should be in first eight signs. > > WHY? IN ORDER FOR IT TO BRING ABOUT AN EARLY EVENT YOU MEAN? WHAT IF VENUS > HAPPENS TO FALL IN THE CONSTELLATION OF REVATI AND/OR ANY OTHER CONSTELLATION > BESIDES THE FIRST 8? PLEASE EXPLAIN AGAIN. > > and in that also not in the constellation of Jupiter and Saturn. > > OK. > > So if it is in Aswini, Bharani, Rohini, Ashlesha, Magha, > Purva, Uttara, Hasta, Chitra, Swati constellation, the period should > be as per the lord of constellation. Rohini,Uttara, Ashlesha, Hasta, > > > THIS IS CONFUSING TO ME. WHAT ABOUT MRIGISHIRA, PURNAVASU AND PUSHYAMI? YOU > SEEMED TO HAVE LEFT THESE OUT AS PART OF THE FIRST 8 SIGNS. COULD YOU > RE-EXPLAIN THIS PART BY USING AN EXAMPLE FOR INSTANCE AS TO WHAT YOU'RE > TRYING TO SAY HERE? > > Gives in first part, Remaing in 2nd part. > > GIVES WHAT IN THE FIRST PART? WHAT'S REMAINING IN THE 2ND PART? > PLEASE CLARIFY. ( I MUST BE HAVING A DUMB DAY. . . ) > > The constellations I omited > in the first 8 signs are bad for Venus. Venus in Krittika, Aradra, > Jestha, ( and Mul) spoils the nature of Venus. So result will not be > favourable. > > IS THERE ANY SPECIFIC EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THESE PARTICULAR NAKSHATRA > POSITIONS ARE WEAK FOR VENUS? > > Thanks, Krushna! ) > > Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2001 Report Share Posted March 17, 2001 Dear Krushna - Missing my mail is not new to me. So many times it happened. Some mail have been received after 48 hours. By that time I have resend another. This problem I face when I send from my out going. If I send it from web, there is no proble. Any how I will send it again tomorrow. Thanks, Krushna - Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2001 Report Share Posted March 17, 2001 Dear Krushna - I received the answers to your questions and will go over them and made the necessary adjustments to lesson 16 before posting it to the FILES section. Thanks - Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2001 Report Share Posted March 17, 2001 Dear Donna, Missing my mail is not new to me. So many times it happened. Some mail have been received after 48 hours. By that time I have resend another. This problem I face when I send from my out going. If I send it from web, there is no proble. Any how I will send it again tomorrow. krushna , DQuinn12@A... wrote: > Dear Krushna - > > > > I have answered for it, it may be in delayed posting. > > If it not reaches I will answer again. > > > > I've received all your other mail so far, but not the one answering the > questions I had from the Lesson 16 paragraph reply to Ron. Could you please > re-send? > > Thanks - > Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.