Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 Dear Ron - I was struck by the number of anomalies regarding the points in the tables. I know that it has been mentioned before, but what prompted this mail is that the 2nd table has a number of differences supposedly due to deleting points for the 12th Lord. These I find hard to understand. I'm sorry Ron. You lost me here somewhere. What tables are you referring to specifically? On the worksheet? In the Lessons? In the archives? Where? >Would it be possible for you to do corrected tables so that current members and future researchers looking at the archives can have the correct tables? Donna, this appears to be an important part of the learning process; and as far as I can see it is not formally part of the Lessons. Shouldn't we have this incorporated as part of the teachings? You need to be more specific as I have no idea of what you're referring to here, sorry. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 Respected Krushna, Checking the 'Complete study of a chart' as revision for the current CA I was struck by the number of anomalies regarding the points in the tables. I know that it has been mentioned before, but what prompted this mail is that the 2nd table has a number of differences supposedly due to deleting points for the 12th Lord. These I find hard to understand. I realize that you may have been rushed when you did these tables, and there may be mistakes. Would it be possible for you to do corrected tables so that current members and future researchers looking at the archives can have the correct tables? Donna, this appears to be an important part of the learning process; and as far as I can see it is not formally part of the Lessons. Shouldn't we have this incorporated as part of the teachings? Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:23:47 EST, you wrote: Donna, This was a mail from Krushna to the List dated 18th December 2000, called 'Complete Study of a chart'. This showed two tables one showing the points for each planet for each house, and the other showing the same, less the points deducted for 12th house Lords. This was on my own chart and went on to give examples of how to use the charts for the specific event; in this case the death of my father. Ron >Dear Ron - > > >> I was struck by the number of anomalies regarding the >> points in the tables. I know that it has been mentioned before, >> but what prompted this mail is that the 2nd table has a number of >> differences supposedly due to deleting points for the 12th Lord. >> These I find hard to understand. >> > >I'm sorry Ron. You lost me here somewhere. What tables are you referring to >specifically? On the worksheet? In the Lessons? In the archives? Where? > >>Would it be possible for you >to do corrected tables so that current members and future >researchers looking at the archives can have the correct tables? >Donna, this appears to be an important part of the learning >process; and as far as I can see it is not formally part of the >Lessons. Shouldn't we have this incorporated as part of the >teachings? > >You need to be more specific as I have no idea of what you're referring to >here, sorry. > >Donna > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 Dear Ron - This was a mail from Krushna to the List dated 18th December 2000, called 'Complete Study of a chart'. This showed two tables one showing the points for each planet for each house, and the other showing the same, less the points deducted for 12th house Lords. This was on my own chart and went on to give examples of how to use the charts for the specific event; in this case the death of my father. If it's all right with Krushna, it's fine with me. I will re-write the whole article into a lesson and submit it to Krushna for verification. But please give me some time. I'm jammed packed with trying to get everything caught up on and I'm drowning in things that need to be done yesterday! I will try to get to it as soon as possible however. Please be patient. Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 Respected Ron, I am not geting which chart you are reffering. It will be very much kind of you if you give some reference, or mail no and date. krushna , Ron Gaunt <arjee@G...> wrote: > > Respected Krushna, > > Checking the 'Complete study of a chart' as revision for the > current CA I was struck by the number of anomalies regarding the > points in the tables. I know that it has been mentioned before, > but what prompted this mail is that the 2nd table has a number of > differences supposedly due to deleting points for the 12th Lord. > These I find hard to understand. > I realize that you may have been rushed when you did these > tables, and there may be mistakes. Would it be possible for you > to do corrected tables so that current members and future > researchers looking at the archives can have the correct tables? > > Donna, this appears to be an important part of the learning > process; and as far as I can see it is not formally part of the > Lessons. Shouldn't we have this incorporated as part of the > teachings? > > > Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 Dear Ron - This was a mail from Krushna to the List dated 18th December 2000, called 'Complete Study of a chart'. This showed two tables one showing the points for each planet for each house, and the other showing the same, less the points deducted for 12th house Lords. This was on my own chart and went on to give examples of how to use the charts for the specific event; in this case the death of my father. I have an even better idea! Since you know your own chart so well and what needs to be done, why not put the whole analysis together in the corrected fashion and I will use it as a case study for one of the upcoming lessons? This way, it would help take some of the pressure off of me and I know you'd do the lesson justice because you're so meticulous with the little details. This is just a suggestion and a way to speed things up a bit at your end. Otherwise, I can't promise you anything soon. Thanks for your help- Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:31:56 EST, you wrote: Donna, Aw shuks! Like you I'm already burning the midnight oil. OK I will try in the next couple of days or so. BUT I don't have your capacity to do beaut (Australian colloquialism) diagrams. I will see if I can find a way to copy the tables and post them to you with an Australian/English translation. Ron >Dear Ron - > > >> This was a mail from Krushna to the List dated 18th December >> 2000, called 'Complete Study of a chart'. This showed two >> tables one showing the points for each planet for each house, and >> the other showing the same, less the points deducted for 12th >> house Lords. This was on my own chart and went on to give >> examples of how to use the charts for the specific event; in this >> case the death of my father. >> > >I have an even better idea! Since you know your own chart so well and what >needs to be done, why not put the whole analysis together in the corrected >fashion and I will use it as a case study for one of the upcoming lessons? >This way, it would help take some of the pressure off of me and I know you'd >do the lesson justice because you're so meticulous with the little details. >This is just a suggestion and a way to speed things up a bit at your end. >Otherwise, I can't promise you anything soon. > >Thanks for your help- >Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2001 Report Share Posted March 23, 2001 Dear Ron - Aw shuks! Like you I'm already burning the midnight oil. OK I will try in the next couple of days or so. BUT I don't have your capacity to do beaut (Australian colloquialism) diagrams. I will see if I can find a way to copy the tables and post them to you with an Australian/English translation. Just give me the meat and guts of it, using as much of Krushna's original analysis that still applies according to the new point spread (also include your birth data here as well) and I'll pretty it up the tables for you, don't worry. ) Thanks, Ron! Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Dear Ron - Sorry I haven't been able to do the work on this, or participate in the exercises. I have been time deprived due to business commitments - working up to 10:30 in the evening. I still have it in mind and when time permits I will get round to doing it. No problem. We'll still be here . . . ) Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:07:10 EST, you wrote: Donna & members, Sorry I haven't been able to do the work on this, or participate in the exercises. I have been time deprived due to business commitments - working up to 10:30 in the evening. I still have it in mind and when time permits I will get round to doing it. Ron >Dear Ron - > > >> Aw shuks! Like you I'm already burning the midnight oil. OK I >> will try in the next couple of days or so. BUT I don't have your >> capacity to do beaut (Australian colloquialism) diagrams. I will >> see if I can find a way to copy the tables and post them to you >> with an Australian/English translation. >> > >Just give me the meat and guts of it, using as much of Krushna's original >analysis that still applies according to the new point spread (also include >your birth data here as well) and I'll pretty it up the tables for you, don't >worry. ) > >Thanks, Ron! > >Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.