Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 4/10/01 3:29:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, krushanain writes:

 

 

Subj: Re: Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

4/10/01 3:29:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time

krushanain

Reply-to:

 

 

 

 

Dear List members,

It is appreciable that more and more members are participating. I must personally thank to Margarita, Cristine, Donna, Ron, Sach, Swee,and Sandy for their participation.

Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the time of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some thing wrong in feeding the computer.

First date was of her marriage.

first child Male child age 19 year running and P.Shada )

Second child Female ( 21 yr running age and P bhadra.)

Third child again female ( age 24 yrs and Vishakha ) Of course it changes to Annuradha. ( Sorry, I should have given the birth time also)

Ron used the transit of Jupiter, and given correct answer. I checked up the transit of Jupiter in the chart it gives same answer. This may be new way to use the chart. But We must check it with more charts. It should satisfy atleast 80% cases.

Last date is the death of the person. Margarita, Ron, Sach, and Sandy given correct answer. Sach have gone one step ahead, Yes she died due to Blood cancer. The period he told is probably correct. Yes She was Rich.

Ron, Cristine, and Swee have used other systems, Cristines answer, for 2nd and 3rd delivery 'Difficult delivery' is correct. it was scissoring.

It was a good attempt.

Thanks

krushna 10th April 2001

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna -

 

 

Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the time of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some thing wrong in feeding the computer.

 

Could you please display the worksheet for this person and how you made the calculations so we can use it as a template for future exercises?

Thanks -

Donna

[Guest guest]

Dear List members,

It is appreciable that more and more members are

participating. I must personally thank to Margarita, Cristine, Donna,

Ron, Sach, Swee,and Sandy for their participation.

 

Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical

calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the time

of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might

have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some

thing wrong in feeding the computer.

 

First date was of her marriage.

first child Male child age 19 year running and P.Shada )

Second child Female ( 21 yr running age and P bhadra.)

Third child again female ( age 24 yrs and Vishakha ) Of course it

changes to Annuradha. ( Sorry, I should have given the birth time

also)

Ron used the transit of Jupiter, and given correct answer. I

checked up the transit of Jupiter in the chart it gives same answer.

This may be new way to use the chart. But We must check it with more

charts. It should satisfy atleast 80% cases.

Last date is the death of the person. Margarita, Ron, Sach,

and Sandy given correct answer.

Sach have gone one step ahead, Yes she died due to Blood

cancer. The period he told is probably correct. Yes She was Rich.

Ron, Cristine, and Swee have used other systems, Cristines

answer, for 2nd and 3rd delivery 'Difficult delivery' is correct. it

was scissoring.

It was a good attempt.

Thanks

krushna 10th April 2001

 

 

, krushanain@h... wrote:

> Dear members,

> Here is a chart of a female.

> D.O.Birth 16th Dec 1954 B.Time 10:15 PM IST (GMT+5.5) at

Ahamadnagar

> 19N05, 74E44 Ayanansha 22:12:21.

> Asc 01:Leo:05,

> Sun 02:Sag:00

> Moon 27:Leo:25

> Mars 16:Aq:37

> Mer. 27: Sc:06

> Jup. 06:Can:19®

> Ven 24:Lib:40

> Sat 24:Lib:39

> Mean Rahu 14:Sag:01

> Ketu 14:Gem.:01

>

> Following are three important dates of her life.

> 1)28th Dec 1972

> 2) 17th March 1974

> 3) 2nd March 1976

> 4) 19th March 1979

> 5) 27th May 1992

> These are the dates for marriage, birth of the 3 children,

> and last one is a special event. Now it is to be find out the sex

of

> the children, and about the last event.

> Members are free to follow any system for finding the

> results.

> Hint : Members following AV can use male/female child table

> answer will be given on 10th April.

> Best of Luck

> krushna 5th April 2001 08:20 Pm

[Guest guest]

Dear Ron -

 

 

What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception

chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts about

this as how many births go to the exact number of days??

However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using

the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth

chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and will

give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given.

 

This isn't Krushna's fault. It's mine. I used the term "Conception Chart" as that's what I assumed it to be. Again, a basic problem in the terminologies used here.

Once Krushna gives us the worksheet so we can compare numbers to make sure all is the same and then show us exactly how he came by these answers for each child, I'm sure we'll all understand it. This is the first time after all and we need some sort of template structure to go by for best results. Then I can put this is Lesson 20 after he approves it and we'll be able to use it as a permanent reference.

 

Donna

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushnaji,

 

Thank you for the answer, Now to learn method of analysing the last event.

 

Respects,

 

Swee

 

krushanain [krushanain]10 April 2001 21:23 Subject: Re: Excercise B.A . 10 AnswerDear List members, It is appreciable that more and more members are participating. I must personally thank to Margarita, Cristine, Donna, Ron, Sach, Swee,and Sandy for their participation. Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the time of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some thing wrong in feeding the computer. First date was of her marriage.first child Male child age 19 year running and P.Shada )Second child Female ( 21 yr running age and P bhadra.)Third child again female ( age 24 yrs and Vishakha ) Of course it changes to Annuradha. ( Sorry, I should have given the birth time also) Ron used the transit of Jupiter, and given correct answer. I checked up the transit of Jupiter in the chart it gives same answer. This may be new way to use the chart. But We must check it with more charts. It should satisfy atleast 80% cases. Last date is the death of the person. Margarita, Ron, Sach, and Sandy given correct answer. Sach have gone one step ahead, Yes she died due to Blood cancer. The period he told is probably correct. Yes She was Rich. Ron, Cristine, and Swee have used other systems, Cristines answer, for 2nd and 3rd delivery 'Difficult delivery' is correct. it was scissoring. It was a good attempt. Thankskrushna 10th April 2001 , krushanain@h... wrote:> Dear members,> Here is a chart of a female.> D.O.Birth 16th Dec 1954 B.Time 10:15 PM IST (GMT+5.5) at Ahamadnagar > 19N05, 74E44 Ayanansha 22:12:21.> Asc 01:Leo:05, > Sun 02:Sag:00> Moon 27:Leo:25> Mars 16:Aq:37> Mer. 27: Sc:06> Jup. 06:Can:19®> Ven 24:Lib:40> Sat 24:Lib:39> Mean Rahu 14:Sag:01> Ketu 14:Gem.:01> > Following are three important dates of her life.> 1)28th Dec 1972> 2) 17th March 1974> 3) 2nd March 1976> 4) 19th March 1979> 5) 27th May 1992> These are the dates for marriage, birth of the 3 children,> and last one is a special event. Now it is to be find out the sex of > the children, and about the last event.> Members are free to follow any system for finding the > results.> Hint : Members following AV can use male/female child table> answer will be given on 10th April.> Best of Luck> krushna 5th April 2001 08:20 Pm

[Guest guest]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:22:37 -0000, you wrote:

 

Respected Krushna and members,

 

 

The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could not

see how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the

'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes out

with the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of a

method of rectification together with the following system that

Krushna uses.

What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception

chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts about

this as how many births go to the exact number of days??

However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using

the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth

chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and will

give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given.

 

 

Ron Gaunt

 

 

 

>Dear List members,

> It is appreciable that more and more members are

>participating. I must personally thank to Margarita, Cristine, Donna,

>Ron, Sach, Swee,and Sandy for their participation.

>

> Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical

>calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the time

>of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might

>have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some

>thing wrong in feeding the computer.

>

> First date was of her marriage.

>first child Male child age 19 year running and P.Shada )

>Second child Female ( 21 yr running age and P bhadra.)

>Third child again female ( age 24 yrs and Vishakha ) Of course it

>changes to Annuradha. ( Sorry, I should have given the birth time

>also)

> Ron used the transit of Jupiter, and given correct answer. I

>checked up the transit of Jupiter in the chart it gives same answer.

>This may be new way to use the chart. But We must check it with more

>charts. It should satisfy atleast 80% cases.

> Last date is the death of the person. Margarita, Ron, Sach,

>and Sandy given correct answer.

> Sach have gone one step ahead, Yes she died due to Blood

>cancer. The period he told is probably correct. Yes She was Rich.

> Ron, Cristine, and Swee have used other systems, Cristines

>answer, for 2nd and 3rd delivery 'Difficult delivery' is correct. it

>was scissoring.

> It was a good attempt.

> Thanks

>krushna 10th April 2001

>

>

>, krushanain@h... wrote:

>> Dear members,

>> Here is a chart of a female.

>> D.O.Birth 16th Dec 1954 B.Time 10:15 PM IST (GMT+5.5) at

>Ahamadnagar

>> 19N05, 74E44 Ayanansha 22:12:21.

>> Asc 01:Leo:05,

>> Sun 02:Sag:00

>> Moon 27:Leo:25

>> Mars 16:Aq:37

>> Mer. 27: Sc:06

>> Jup. 06:Can:19®

>> Ven 24:Lib:40

>> Sat 24:Lib:39

>> Mean Rahu 14:Sag:01

>> Ketu 14:Gem.:01

>>

>> Following are three important dates of her life.

>> 1)28th Dec 1972

>> 2) 17th March 1974

>> 3) 2nd March 1976

>> 4) 19th March 1979

>> 5) 27th May 1992

>> These are the dates for marriage, birth of the 3 children,

>> and last one is a special event. Now it is to be find out the sex

>of

>> the children, and about the last event.

>> Members are free to follow any system for finding the

>> results.

>> Hint : Members following AV can use male/female child table

>> answer will be given on 10th April.

>> Best of Luck

>> krushna 5th April 2001 08:20 Pm

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna,

Ron, and List Members,

 

Ron…Could

you please elaborate on what you wrote below? You are correct in saying that

the methodology for finding the correct nakshatra is unclear, and I’m totally misunderstanding

how we should actually work this calculation..

 

For

example, I was under the impression that in order to find the conception date, we were to subtract 272.25 from the day the child was born. I

now think this is incorrect, based on Krushna’s answer…

 

For example, for the 1st child,

I subtracted 272.25 days from March 17, 1974, the child’s date of birth, and

came up with a conception date of June 18, 1973. Now on June 18, 1973, the

mother was only 18 years of age, as her birthday doesn’t fall until December of

that year, and the birth took place in March. However

that would be considered in her 19th year of life, regardless of

when the birthday fell, so perhaps that was the first mistake? So I

then proceeded to use the age of 18 in the table given by Krushna, following

the sex for the nakshatra, Uttarashadha, which gives a female child.

 

Now, it

appears that Krushna has taken the birthdate

of the child, looked at the Moon’s nakshatra for

that date, and then the mother’s age on that year in question…(regardless of whether the

date falls before or after her

birthday) Is this correct?

 

I’m

unclear on the correct methodology to follow – as I’m sure others are also…Thanks.

 

 

~Namaste~

Sandy

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

 

Respected Krushna and members,

 

 

The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could not

see how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the

'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes out

with the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of a

method of rectification together with the following system that

Krushna uses.

What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception

chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts

about

this as how many births go to the exact number of days??

However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using

the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth

chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and

will

give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given.

 

 

Ron Gaunt

 

 

..

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna,

 

I also wanted to thank you very much for all you are teaching us about

ashtakavarga delineation, and to add that this method of predicting the child’s

sex is such an extremely valuable tool for prediction if we can get a firm

handle on how to operate it correctly.

 

So THANK YOU for all your patience with us…I find your teachings quite astute,

articulate, and certainly above the ordinary - especially when it comes to

focusing in on a specific area of analysis.

 

~Namaste~

Sandy

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

 

-----Original

Message-----

Sandy Crowther

[sandy]

Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:14

PM

To:

 

RE:

Re: Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

 

Dear Krushna, Ron, and List Members,

 

Ron…Could you please elaborate on what you wrote

below? You are correct in saying that the methodology for finding the correct

nakshatra is unclear, and I’m totally misunderstanding how we should actually

work this calculation..

 

For example, I was under the impression that in order

to find the conception date, we

were to subtract 272.25 from the day the

child was born. I now think this is incorrect, based on Krushna’s

answer…

 

For

example, for the 1st child, I subtracted 272.25 days from March 17,

1974, the child’s date of birth, and came up with a conception date of June 18,

1973. Now on June 18, 1973, the mother was only 18 years of age, as her

birthday doesn’t fall until December of that year, and the birth took place in

March. However that would be considered in

her 19th year of life, regardless of when the birthday fell, so

perhaps that was the first mistake? So I then proceeded to use the

age of 18 in the table given by Krushna, following the sex for the nakshatra,

Uttarashadha, which gives a female child.

 

Now, it appears that Krushna has taken the birthdate of the child, looked at the

Moon’s nakshatra for that date,

and then the mother’s age on that year

in question…(regardless of whether the date falls before or after her birthday) Is this correct?

 

I’m unclear on the correct methodology to follow – as

I’m sure others are also…Thanks.

 

 

~Namaste~

Sandy

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

 

Respected Krushna and members,

 

 

The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could not

see how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the

'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes out

with the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of a

method of rectification together with the following system that

Krushna uses.

What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception

chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts

about

this as how many births go to the exact number of days??

However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using

the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth

chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and

will

give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given.

 

 

Ron Gaunt

 

 

..

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Hello Sandy,

Yes, I suppose so, that was also my confusion. Normally at conception she was 18 years old, but in het 19th year. Probably that's how it works

Margarita

 

-

Sandy Crowther

Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:13 AM

RE: Re: Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

 

 

Dear Krushna, Ron, and List Members,

 

Ron…Could you please elaborate on what you wrote below? You are correct in saying that the methodology for finding the correct nakshatra is unclear, and I’m totally misunderstanding how we should actually work this calculation..

 

For example, I was under the impression that in order to find the conception date, we were to subtract 272.25 from the day the child was born. I now think this is incorrect, based on Krushna’s answer…

 

For example, for the 1st child, I subtracted 272.25 days from March 17, 1974, the child’s date of birth, and came up with a conception date of June 18, 1973. Now on June 18, 1973, the mother was only 18 years of age, as her birthday doesn’t fall until December of that year, and the birth took place in March. However that would be considered in her 19th year of life, regardless of when the birthday fell, so perhaps that was the first mistake? So I then proceeded to use the age of 18 in the table given by Krushna, following the sex for the nakshatra, Uttarashadha, which gives a female child.

 

Now, it appears that Krushna has taken the birthdate of the child, looked at the Moon’s nakshatra for that date, and then the mother’s age on that year in question…(regardless of whether the date falls before or after her birthday) Is this correct?

 

I’m unclear on the correct methodology to follow – as I’m sure others are also…Thanks.

 

 

~Namaste~

Sandy

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

 

Respected Krushna and members,The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could notsee how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes outwith the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of amethod of rectification together with the following system thatKrushna uses.What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conceptionchart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts aboutthis as how many births go to the exact number of days??However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact usingthe table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birthchart' for the child. This is much more to the point and willgive the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given. Ron Gaunt.

[Guest guest]

Dear Prakash,

Sorry I have forgotten your name in my last message.

Congratulations for correct answer. Very nice attempt.

thanks

krushna

 

, krushanain@h... wrote:

> Dear List members,

> It is appreciable that more and more members are

> participating. I must personally thank to Margarita, Cristine,

Donna,

> Ron, Sach, Swee,and Sandy for their participation.

>

> Finding the sex of the here was a pure mathamatical

> calculations. The age of the mother should be running age at the

time

> of conception. Some have taken completed age. so their answer might

> have differed. Some have got different Constellation may be some

> thing wrong in feeding the computer.

>

> First date was of her marriage.

> first child Male child age 19 year running and P.Shada )

> Second child Female ( 21 yr running age and P bhadra.)

> Third child again female ( age 24 yrs and Vishakha ) Of course it

> changes to Annuradha. ( Sorry, I should have given the birth time

> also)

> Ron used the transit of Jupiter, and given correct answer.

I

> checked up the transit of Jupiter in the chart it gives same

answer.

> This may be new way to use the chart. But We must check it with

more

> charts. It should satisfy atleast 80% cases.

> Last date is the death of the person. Margarita, Ron,

Sach,

> and Sandy given correct answer.

> Sach have gone one step ahead, Yes she died due to Blood

> cancer. The period he told is probably correct. Yes She was Rich.

> Ron, Cristine, and Swee have used other systems, Cristines

> answer, for 2nd and 3rd delivery 'Difficult delivery' is correct.

it

> was scissoring.

> It was a good attempt.

> Thanks

> krushna 10th April 2001

>

>

> , krushanain@h... wrote:

> > Dear members,

> > Here is a chart of a female.

> > D.O.Birth 16th Dec 1954 B.Time 10:15 PM IST (GMT+5.5) at

> Ahamadnagar

> > 19N05, 74E44 Ayanansha 22:12:21.

> > Asc 01:Leo:05,

> > Sun 02:Sag:00

> > Moon 27:Leo:25

> > Mars 16:Aq:37

> > Mer. 27: Sc:06

> > Jup. 06:Can:19®

> > Ven 24:Lib:40

> > Sat 24:Lib:39

> > Mean Rahu 14:Sag:01

> > Ketu 14:Gem.:01

> >

> > Following are three important dates of her life.

> > 1)28th Dec 1972

> > 2) 17th March 1974

> > 3) 2nd March 1976

> > 4) 19th March 1979

> > 5) 27th May 1992

> > These are the dates for marriage, birth of the 3

children,

> > and last one is a special event. Now it is to be find out the

sex

> of

> > the children, and about the last event.

> > Members are free to follow any system for finding the

> > results.

> > Hint : Members following AV can use male/female child

table

> > answer will be given on 10th April.

> > Best of Luck

> > krushna 5th April 2001 08:20 Pm

[Guest guest]

Dear Margarita and Sandy, and other list members,

The age should be taken as running age. Similar to we write for planets

: Sun 4::20:30:15 means SUN have crossed 4 sign and it is in 5th sign.

Similarly if the age at last birth day is 18 years then it means person have

completed 18 years and 19th year is running. So we must see the age below 19

year.

I think this is clear.

krushna 15th April 2001 11:30 Pm

Let us hope this reaches early.

 

 

 

> " Lettens " <dmlettens

>

>

>Re: Re: Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:31:51 +0200

>

>Hello Sandy,

>Yes, I suppose so, that was also my confusion. Normally at conception she

>was 18 years old, but in het 19th year. Probably that's how it works

>Margarita

> -

> Sandy Crowther

>

> Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:13 AM

> RE: Re: Excercise B.A . 10 Answer

>

>

> Dear Krushna, Ron, and List Members,

>

>

>

> Ron.Could you please elaborate on what you wrote below? You are correct

>in saying that the methodology for finding the correct nakshatra is

>unclear, and I'm totally misunderstanding how we should actually work this

>calculation..

>

>

>

> For example, I was under the impression that in order to find the

>conception date, we were to subtract 272.25 from the day the child was

>born. I now think this is incorrect, based on Krushna's answer.

>

>

>

> For example, for the 1st child, I subtracted 272.25 days from March 17,

>1974, the child's date of birth, and came up with a conception date of June

>18, 1973. Now on June 18, 1973, the mother was only 18 years of age, as her

>birthday doesn't fall until December of that year, and the birth took place

>in March. However that would be considered in her 19th year of life,

>regardless of when the birthday fell, so perhaps that was the first

>mistake? So I then proceeded to use the age of 18 in the table given by

>Krushna, following the sex for the nakshatra, Uttarashadha, which gives a

>female child.

>

>

>

> Now, it appears that Krushna has taken the birthdate of the child,

>looked at the Moon's nakshatra for that date, and then the mother's age on

>that year in question.(regardless of whether the date falls before or after

>her birthday) Is this correct?

>

>

>

> I'm unclear on the correct methodology to follow - as I'm sure others

>are also.Thanks.

>

>

>

>

>

> ~Namaste~

>

> Sandy

>

> http://www.jupitersweb.com/

>

>

>

> Respected Krushna and members,

>

>

> The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could not

> see how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the

> 'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes out

> with the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of a

> method of rectification together with the following system that

> Krushna uses.

> What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception

> chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts about

> this as how many births go to the exact number of days??

> However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using

> the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth

> chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and will

> give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given.

>

>

> Ron Gaunt

>

>

> .

>

>

>

>

>