Guest guest Posted April 11, 2001 Report Share Posted April 11, 2001 Respected Ron, Pranam, I have tried with few more charts, considering Jupiters transit. Most of the cases it comes correct. It can also be used as contra check. Thanks, krushna , Ron Gaunt <arjee@G...> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:22:37 -0000, you wrote: > > Respected Krushna and members, > > > The reason I used the transit of Jupiter was because I could not > see how to differentiate between two nakshastras on the > 'conception' date. It is interesting to see that it comes out > with the correct answer; and suggests the possibilities of a > method of rectification together with the following system that > Krushna uses. > What threw me, and possibly other members is the term 'conception > chart'. I like others subtracted 272 days. I had doubts about > this as how many births go to the exact number of days?? > However, I note in Krushna's answer that he is NOT in fact using > the table in Lesson 20 as a 'conception chart' but as a 'birth > chart' for the child. This is much more to the point and will > give the appropriate nakshastra provided birth time is given. > > > Ron Gaunt > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.