Deducing the Occupation: Query

[Guest guest]

Respected Krushna and list members,

 

Namaste.

 

In lesson 21, you have taught us how to deduce a person's occupation.

The first step of the procedure was to investigate the lords of the

10th from the lagna, sun & moon, and any tenants in these houses. The

planets involved are to be located in the navamsa and their lords

considered as indicators.

 

Next, using the tables of strength, we were to look for the strongest

planets, i.e. planets with more than 12 points in all houses, and

these would serve as further, if not better, indicators. In the

example given, Jupiter, which was deduced from the first step, was

abandoned in favour of Saturn; and Mercury, which was strong, unlike

Jupiter, was also used.

 

My query is, if the first step produces planets which are ALL weak in

the worksheet, do we use the strongest planets and, therefore, not

consider those we found in step 1?

 

Specifically, this method was applied to one chart to obtain Jupiter

ONLY in the first step. However, Jupiter is weak, as seen from the

worksheet (<12 in 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th, 10th & 12th), and the worksheet

gives Moon, Mercury & Saturn as the strongest planets overall. Shall

Jupiter thus be discarded, and Moon, Mercury and Saturn considered

instead?

 

Thank you for your kind attention.

 

Best wishes,

Lauren

[Guest guest]

Dear Lauren,

My comments in block letters,

 

, suirattigas@z... wrote:

> Respected Krushna and list members,

>

> Namaste.

>

> In lesson 21, you have taught us how to deduce a person's

occupation.

> The first step of the procedure was to investigate the lords of the

> 10th from the lagna, sun & moon, and any tenants in these houses.

The planets involved are to be located in the navamsa and their lords

considered as indicators. CORRECT

Next, using the tables of strength, we were to look for the strongest

planets, i.e. planets with more than 12 points in all houses, and

these would serve as further, if not better, indicators. In the

example given, Jupiter, which was deduced from the first step, was

abandoned in favour of Saturn; and Mercury, which was strong, unlike

Jupiter, was also used. My query is, if the first step produces

planets which are ALL weak in the worksheet, do we use the strongest

planets and, therefore, not consider those we found in step 1? WE

SHOULD CONSIDER FIRST THE PLANETS FROM NAVAMANSHA CHART. THIS WILL

GIVE THE LINE OF WORK CONNECTED TO THE PLANETS, OR ITS SAMDHARMI.

>

Specifically, this method was applied to one chart to

obtain Jupiter ONLY in the first step. However, Jupiter is weak, as

seen from the worksheet (<12 in 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th, 10th & 12th), and

the worksheet gives Moon, Mercury & Saturn as the strongest planets

overall. Shall Jupiter thus be discarded, and Moon, Mercury and

Saturn considered instead? THE PERSON CAN HAVE LINE OF WORK

CONNECTED TO JUPITER. THE POINTS IN THE WORKSHEET GIVE THE RESULT FOR

THE HOUSE IN THE SUB PERIOD OF THE PLANET. IF JUPITER IS WEAK, IT

WILL NOT GIVE GOOD RESULTS FOR THE HOUSES IT IS WEAK. THIS IS LIMITED

TO THE SUB PERIOD OF THE PLANET. YOU SAID JUPITER IS HAVING LESS

PIOINTS FOR 1ST,5TH,7TH,8TH,10TH, AND 12, SO THE RESULTS INDICATED

FOR THESE HOUSES WILL BE NOT SO GOOD IN THE SUB PERIOD OF JUPITER.

MOON, MERCURY, SATURN ARE STRONGER THEN THE OVERALL RESULT FOR ALL

THE HOUSES WILL BE GOOD IN THE SUB PERIOD OF THESE PLANETS. IF THE

SUB PERIOD OF WEAK PLANET COMES IN THE START OF THE WORK, IT WILL

DISTURB THE PERSON. SO AT THE AGE WHEN PERSON FINISHES HIS STUDIES,

AND STARTS SOME WORK, HE SHOULD NOT HAVE PERIODS OF WEAK PLANETS IN

SERIES. THIS WILL DISTURB HIS MENTAL CAPECITY. SUPPOSE IF THE HOUSES

WHICH ARE WEAK ARE NOT CONNECTED TO FINANCE OR HIS BUSINESS, HE CAN

HAVE THE HELP OF THOSE PLANETS.

KRUSHNA

> Thank you for your kind attention.

>

> Best wishes,

> Lauren